Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Revolutionizing malaria diagnosis: deep learning-powered detection of parasite-infected red blood cells

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4518-4530
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2024-08-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Malaria is a significant global health issue, responsible for the highest rates of morbidity and mortality globally. This paper introduces a very effective and precise convolutional neural network (CNN) method that employs advanced deep learning techniques to automate the detection of malaria in images of red blood cells (RBC). Furthermore, we present an emerging and efficient deep learning method for differentiating between cells infected with malaria and those that are not infected. To thoroughly evaluate the efficiency of our approach, we do a meticulous assessment that involves comparing different deep learning models, such as ResNet-50, MobileNet-v2, and Inception-v3, within the domain of malaria detection. Additionally, we conduct a thorough comparison of our proposed approach with current automated methods for malaria identification. An examination of the most current techniques reveals differences in performance metrics, such as accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score, for diagnosing malaria. Moreover, compared to existing models for malaria detection, our method is the most successful, achieving an accurate score of 1.00 in all statistical matrices, confirming its promise as a highly efficient tool for automating malaria detection.

Collaboration network of the authors

5 authors · 10 co-authorship links · 6 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology
  • International Islamic University Chittagong
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Revolutionizing malaria diagnosis: deep learning-powered detection of parasite-infected red blood cells</dc:title><dc:creator>Hoque, Md. Jiabul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Islam, Md. Saiful</dc:creator><dc:creator>Khaliluzzaman, Md.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Muntasir, Abdullah Al</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mohsin, Mohammad Abdullah Bin</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Malaria is a significant global health issue, responsible for the highest rates of morbidity and mortality globally. This paper introduces a very effective and precise convolutional neural network (CNN) method that employs advanced deep learning techniques to automate the detection of malaria in images of red blood cells (RBC). Furthermore, we present an emerging and efficient deep learning method for differentiating between cells infected with malaria and those that are not infected. To thoroughly evaluate the efficiency of our approach, we do a meticulous assessment that involves comparing different deep learning models, such as ResNet-50, MobileNet-v2, and Inception-v3, within the domain of malaria detection. Additionally, we conduct a thorough comparison of our proposed approach with current automated methods for malaria identification. An examination of the most current techniques reveals differences in performance metrics, such as accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score, for diagnosing malaria. Moreover, compared to existing models for malaria detection, our method is the most successful, achieving an accurate score of 1.00 in all statistical matrices, confirming its promise as a highly efficient tool for automating malaria detection.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-08-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4518-4530</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4518-4530</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 14 No 4 (2024); 4518</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/34827/17566</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>