Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Student performance classification: a comparison of feature selection methods based on online learning activities

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4675-4685
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2024-08-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The classification of student performance involves categorizing students' performance using input data such as demographic information and examination results. However, our study introduces a novel approach by emphasizing students' online learning activities as a rich data source. To avoid misinterpretation during the classification, we therefore presented a study comparing several feature selection (FS) methods combined with artificial neural network (ANN), for classifying students’ performance based on their online learning activities. At first, we focused on tackling the issue of missing values by implementing data cleaning using variance threshold. Feature selection techniques were implemented which encompass both filter-based (information gain, chi-square, Pearson correlation) and wrapper-based, sequential selection (forward and backward) techniques. In the classification stage, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) was used with the default hyperparameters and 5-fold cross-validation along with synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) were also applied to each method. We evaluated each feature selection method's performance using key metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The outcomes highlighted information gain and sequential selection (forward and backward) as the top-performing methods, all achieving 100% accuracy. This research underscores the potential of leveraging online learning activities for robust student performance classification within the specified constraints.

Collaboration network of the authors

36 authors · 125 co-authorship links · 10 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • International University of Sarajevo
  • Sultan Zainal Abidin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nurlaila IsmailUniversiti Teknologi MARA5
Zakiah Mohd YusoffUniversiti Teknologi MARA4
Rozita JailaniUniversiti Teknologi MARA4
Hasnain AbdullahUniversiti Teknologi MARA3
Azizah Hanom AhmadUniversiti Teknologi MARA3
Linda Mohd KasimUniversiti Teknologi MARA3
Megat Syahirul Amin Megat AliUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Aisyah Hartini JahidinUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Nooritawati Md TahirUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Noratikah Zawani MahabobUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Aqib Fawwaz Mohd AmidonUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Saiful Nizam TajuddinAffiliation unknown2
Ali Abd AlmisrebInternational University of Sarajevo2
Norhayati Mohamad NoorUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Nor Syahira Jak JailaniUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Zuraida MuhammadUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Mohd Hezri Fazalul RahimanUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Siti Mariatul Hazwa Mohd HuzirUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Norsuzila Ya’acobUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Azita Laily YusofUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Nik Nur Shaadah Nik DzulkefliUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Roslan UmarSultan Zainal Abidin University1
Noor Aida Syakira Ahmad SabriUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Nik Fasha Edora Nik KamaruzamanUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Ahmad Ihsan Mohd YassinUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Nur Shafikah RosliUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Samihah AbdullahUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Shafaq Mardhiyana Mohamat KasimUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Norhayati Mohd NoorAffiliation unknown1
Nazirah Mohamat KasimUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Noor Azila IsmailUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Nur Qaisarah AnuarUniversiti Teknologi MARA1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Student performance classification: a comparison of feature selection methods based on online learning activities</dc:title><dc:creator>Alias, Muhamad Aqif Hadi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abdul Aziz, Mohd Azri</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hambali, Najidah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Taib, Mohd Nasir</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The classification of student performance involves categorizing students' performance using input data such as demographic information and examination results. However, our study introduces a novel approach by emphasizing students' online learning activities as a rich data source. To avoid misinterpretation during the classification, we therefore presented a study comparing several feature selection (FS) methods combined with artificial neural network (ANN), for classifying students’ performance based on their online learning activities. At first, we focused on tackling the issue of missing values by implementing data cleaning using variance threshold. Feature selection techniques were implemented which encompass both filter-based (information gain, chi-square, Pearson correlation) and wrapper-based, sequential selection (forward and backward) techniques. In the classification stage, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) was used with the default hyperparameters and 5-fold cross-validation along with synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) were also applied to each method. We evaluated each feature selection method's performance using key metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The outcomes highlighted information gain and sequential selection (forward and backward) as the top-performing methods, all achieving 100% accuracy. This research underscores the potential of leveraging online learning activities for robust student performance classification within the specified constraints.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-08-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4675-4685</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4675-4685</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 14 No 4 (2024); 4675</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/34619/17582</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>