Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Analyzing schools admission performance achievement using hierarchical clustering

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 14 No. 5 (2024)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v14i5.pp5566-5584
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2024-10-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

In this study, an implementation of hierarchical clustering methods was conducted in schools’ admission data. We aim to demonstrate that the hierarchical clustering method can be used to help analyze the membership changes of each cluster based on its achievement number of new students from different months period observations. This method can be used by decision-makers to make a strategy for each school which has decreasing achievement from the previous period. In this paper, we employ the hierarchical clustering method to cluster admission performance achievement from fifty Telkom Schools. Instead of clustering admission in one period directly, this paper tried to analyze the movement of clustering membership from one period to another. We observed the movement membership of the group from three categories period, such as monthly, quarterly, and semesterly. The experimental results demonstrate that the monthly scenario was the best clustering result. The monthly scenario achieves the best score for all metrics such as the Dunn index, Silhouette score, Davies-Bouldin index, and Calinski-Harabasz compared to the quarter and semester scenario. There are four schools which are consistent in the first cluster and seven schools which are consistent in the second cluster in all scenarios and all periods.

Collaboration network of the authors

11 authors · 24 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Telkom University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Siska Komala SariTelkom University1
KastamanTelkom University1
Heru Pudyo NugrohoTelkom University1
Kastaman KastamanTelkom University1
Sherin Nadya MeideniTelkom University1
Padma Edhitya Chairunnisafa PriyonoTelkom University1
Muhammad Galang FathirkinaTelkom University1
Samira SamiraTelkom University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Analyzing schools admission performance achievement using hierarchical clustering</dc:title><dc:creator>Fahrudin, Tora</dc:creator><dc:creator>Asror, Ibnu</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wibowo, Yanuar Firdaus Arie</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;In this study, an implementation of hierarchical clustering methods was conducted in schools’ admission data. We aim to demonstrate that the hierarchical clustering method can be used to help analyze the membership changes of each cluster based on its achievement number of new students from different months period observations. This method can be used by decision-makers to make a strategy for each school which has decreasing achievement from the previous period. In this paper, we employ the hierarchical clustering method to cluster admission performance achievement from fifty Telkom Schools. Instead of clustering admission in one period directly, this paper tried to analyze the movement of clustering membership from one period to another. We observed the movement membership of the group from three categories period, such as monthly, quarterly, and semesterly. The experimental results demonstrate that the monthly scenario was the best clustering result. The monthly scenario achieves the best score for all metrics such as the Dunn index, Silhouette score, Davies-Bouldin index, and Calinski-Harabasz compared to the quarter and semester scenario. There are four schools which are consistent in the first cluster and seven schools which are consistent in the second cluster in all scenarios and all periods.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-10-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i5.pp5566-5584</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v14i5.pp5566-5584</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 14 No 5 (2024); 5566</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/35634/17695</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>