Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Dualism of Competences in The Settlement of Child Abusement Cases in Aceh: Case Number 231/Pid.Sus/2018/ PN Bna and 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs [Dualisme Kewenangan Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak di Aceh: 231/Pid.Sus/2018/ PN Bna dan 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs]

Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021) · pp. 109–128

DOI
10.22373/legitimasi.v10i1.10520
ISSN
2579-5104, 2088-8813
Published
2021-06-30
Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Language
eng

Abstract

Abstract: There is a dualism of competencies in the settlement of cases of sexual abuse of children in Aceh. The practice of dualism of competencies occurs in the settlement of cases of criminal acts of sexual abuse against children in Aceh where case Number 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna was resolved in the Banda Aceh District Court and case Number 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs was resolved in the Mahkamah Syar'iyah Langsa. The research questions are why there is the dualism of authority in resolving cases of child molestation in Aceh and what is the juridical basis for the Banda Aceh District Court and the Langsa Mahkamah Syar'iyah Court in adjudicating cases of child abuse. This research uses normative juridical research. Dualism occurs because the Qanun Jinayat and the Child Protection Law (UUPA) regulate the sexual abuse of children. The juridical basis of the District Court in the settlement of cases of criminal acts of sexual abuse against children in case Number 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna uses Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection (UUPA), and the juridical basis of the Syar'iyah Court in the settlement cases of criminal acts of sexual abuse against children in case Number 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs using Article 47 of Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law. The judicial process against Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law was carried out at the Syar'iyah Court. The norm that has the authority to adjudicate is the Syar'iyah Court by implementing the Qanun Jinayat. Abstrak: Terdapat dualisme kewenangan dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak di Aceh. Praktiknya dualisme kewenangan terjadi dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak di Aceh dimana pada perkara Nomor 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna diselesaikan di Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh dan perkara Nomor 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs di selesaikan di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Langsa. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian skripsi ini adalah mengapa terjadi dualisme kewenangan dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak di Aceh dan apa dasar yuridis Pengadilan negeri Banda Aceh dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Langsa dalam mengadili perkara pencabulan terhadap anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Dualisme terjadi dikarenakan Qanun Jinayat dan Undang-undang Perlindungan Anak (UUPA) mengatur pencabulan terhadap anak. Adapun landasan yuridis Pengadilan Negeri dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak pada perkara Nomor 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna menggunakan Undang-undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak (UUPA), dan landasan yuridis Mahkamah Syar’iyah dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak pada perkara Nomor 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs menggunakan Pasal 47 Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Proses peradilan terhadap Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat dilaksanakan di Mahkamah Syar’iyah. Secara norma yang berwenang mengadili ialah Mahkamah Syar’iyah dengan menerapkan Qanun Jinayat.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 65 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Khairani KhairaniAffiliation unknown3
Jamhuri UngelAffiliation unknown2
Mumtazinur MumtazinurAffiliation unknown2
Sitti MawarAffiliation unknown2
Edi YuhermansyahAffiliation unknown2
Nila ShintiaAffiliation unknown1
Iklima RitaAffiliation unknown1
Mukhlizar MukhlizarAffiliation unknown1
Aulia RahmaAffiliation unknown1
MarzatillahAffiliation unknown1
Kamaruzzaman Bustamam AhmadAffiliation unknown1
M. Firdaus AnnurAffiliation unknown1
Syamsul RijalAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad HabibiUniversitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta1
Dara MasyittahAffiliation unknown1
Jamhir JamhirAffiliation unknown1
Harry Fajar RizkiAffiliation unknown1
Samsul BahriAffiliation unknown1
Nada Balkis SuciAffiliation unknown1
Ida MeutiawatiAffiliation unknown1
Leny OktaviyantiAffiliation unknown1
Edi DarmawijayaAffiliation unknown1
Ayu DarisahAffiliation unknown1
Safira MaulinaAffiliation unknown1
Arifin AbdullahAffiliation unknown1
Saiful Aris MunandarAffiliation unknown1
Afrizal AfrizalAffiliation unknown1
A. Hamid SarongAffiliation unknown1
Karimuddin KarimuddinAffiliation unknown1
Ida FriatnaAffiliation unknown1
Nazaruddin Abdul WahidAffiliation unknown1
Datul MutiaAffiliation unknown1
Iman IslamiAffiliation unknown1
Harnides HarnidesAffiliation unknown1
Khairuddin HasballahAffiliation unknown1
Nasaiy AzizAffiliation unknown1
Tika AnggrainiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/legitimasi/oai, first harvested 7 Nov 2026, last seen 7 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Dualism of Competences in The Settlement of Child Abusement Cases in Aceh: Case Number 231/Pid.Sus/2018/ PN Bna and 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs [Dualisme Kewenangan Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak di Aceh: 231/Pid.Sus/2018/ PN Bna dan 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs]</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rispalman, Rispalman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Abbas, Syahrizal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ariani, Desi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Dualism of Competences</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Child Abusement Cases</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Jinayat Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Abstract: There is a dualism of competencies in the settlement of cases of sexual abuse of children in Aceh. The practice of dualism of competencies occurs in the settlement of cases of criminal acts of sexual abuse against children in Aceh where case Number 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna was resolved in the Banda Aceh District Court and case Number 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs was resolved in the Mahkamah Syar'iyah Langsa. The research questions are why there is the dualism of authority in resolving cases of child molestation in Aceh and what is the juridical basis for the Banda Aceh District Court and the Langsa Mahkamah Syar'iyah Court in adjudicating cases of child abuse. This research uses normative juridical research. Dualism occurs because the Qanun Jinayat and the Child Protection Law (UUPA) regulate the sexual abuse of children. The juridical basis of the District Court in the settlement of cases of criminal acts of sexual abuse against children in case Number 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna uses Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection (UUPA), and the juridical basis of the Syar'iyah Court in the settlement cases of criminal acts of sexual abuse against children in case Number 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs using Article 47 of Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law. The judicial process against Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law was carried out at the Syar'iyah Court. The norm that has the authority to adjudicate is the Syar'iyah Court by implementing the Qanun Jinayat. Abstrak: Terdapat dualisme kewenangan dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak di Aceh. Praktiknya dualisme kewenangan terjadi dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak di Aceh dimana pada perkara Nomor 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna diselesaikan di Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh dan perkara Nomor 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs di selesaikan di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Langsa. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian skripsi ini adalah mengapa terjadi dualisme kewenangan dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak di Aceh dan apa dasar yuridis Pengadilan negeri Banda Aceh dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Langsa dalam mengadili perkara pencabulan terhadap anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Dualisme terjadi dikarenakan Qanun Jinayat dan Undang-undang Perlindungan Anak (UUPA) mengatur pencabulan terhadap anak. Adapun landasan yuridis Pengadilan Negeri dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak pada perkara Nomor 231/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Bna menggunakan Undang-undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak (UUPA), dan landasan yuridis Mahkamah Syar’iyah dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak pada perkara Nomor 005/JN/2017/Ms-Lgs menggunakan Pasal 47 Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Proses peradilan terhadap Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat dilaksanakan di Mahkamah Syar’iyah. Secara norma yang berwenang mengadili ialah Mahkamah Syar’iyah dengan menerapkan Qanun Jinayat.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/legitimasi/article/view/10520</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/legitimasi.v10i1.10520</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021); 109-128</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2579-5104</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-8813</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/legitimasi/article/view/10520/6396</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Rispalman Rispalman, Syahrizal Abbas, Desi Ariani</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>