Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Polarization of Judge Considerations in Waqf Disputes at Aceh's Syar'iyah Cour

Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial · Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 148–169

DOI
10.22373/jms.v25i1.16999
ISSN
2579-5090, 1411-2353
Published
2023-07-01
Publisher
Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Language
eng

Abstract

To protect waqf property, the Waqaf Law and KHI demand that waqf conflicts be settled peacefully to reach a win-win solution. However, Sharia Court judges still frequently decide waqf disputes in Aceh with a win-lose outcome; as a result, they do not protect waqf assets. This study evaluates Indonesian normative law using a qualitative method and court rulings. Field and library research yielded primary, secondary, and tertiary data. The study discovered three models of waqf conflicts in the Syar'iyah Court: waqf disputes that look at the parties' positions, which influences court evidence; waqf disputes that look at movable and immovable waqf assets; and models that look at both. Waqf property is either productive or unproductive. Second, the parties' reasons for settling the Waqf Dispute at Syar'iyah Court were: 1) Peace and 2) Interest factors to achieve legal certainty. Third, Syar'iyah Court judges only assess events, legal facts, and evidence in dispute settlement, not waqf asset protection. This research hopes to give Syar'iyah Court judges a legal umbrella to actively resolve waqf conflicts.Untuk melindungi harta benda wakaf, UU Waqaf dan KHI menuntut agar konflik wakaf diselesaikan secara damai untuk mencapai win-win solution. Namun, hakim Mahkamah Syariah masih sering memutuskan sengketa wakaf di Aceh dengan hasil menang-kalah; akibatnya, mereka tidak melindungi aset wakaf. Studi ini mengevaluasi hukum normatif Indonesia dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif dan putusan pengadilan. Penelitian lapangan dan kepustakaan menghasilkan data primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Studi ini menemukan tiga model konflik wakaf di Mahkamah Syar'iyah: sengketa wakaf yang melihat posisi para pihak, yang mempengaruhi pembuktian di pengadilan; sengketa wakaf yang menyangkut harta benda wakaf bergerak dan tidak bergerak; dan model yang melihat keduanya. Harta wakaf bisa produktif atau tidak produktif. Kedua, alasan para pihak menyelesaikan Sengketa Wakaf di Mahkamah Syar'iyah adalah: 1) Perdamaian dan 2) Faktor kepentingan untuk mencapai kepastian hukum. Ketiga, hakim Mahkamah Syar'iyah hanya menilai peristiwa, fakta hukum, dan bukti dalam penyelesaian sengketa, bukan perlindungan harta benda wakaf. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan payung hukum kepada hakim Mahkamah Syar'iyah untuk secara aktif menyelesaikan konflik wakaf.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 67 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Lampung University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Puji Winar CahyoAffiliation unknown3
Adri PriadanaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Muhammad Rifqi Ma'arifAffiliation unknown1
Rizki Andre HandikaAffiliation unknown1
TyasAffiliation unknown1
Bambang IrawanLampung University1
Andang FazriAffiliation unknown1
Suswita RozaAffiliation unknown1
Multazam MultazamAffiliation unknown1
Fauzan FauzanAffiliation unknown1
Muslem MuslemAffiliation unknown1
Sitti MawarAffiliation unknown1
Syahrizal AbbasAffiliation unknown1
Kamaruzzaman KamaruzzamanAffiliation unknown1
Munanda MunandaAffiliation unknown1
Oktavi MaulizarAffiliation unknown1
Faisal FauzanAffiliation unknown1
Luqman NurhisamAffiliation unknown1
Nurdianti NurdiantiAffiliation unknown1
Khairani MukdinAffiliation unknown1
Khaliza AdzkiaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad MaulanaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Alfi SyahriAffiliation unknown1
Armiyadi ArmiyadiAffiliation unknown1
Rispalman RispalmanAffiliation unknown1
Saiful Aris MunandarAffiliation unknown1
Muhadi KhalidiAffiliation unknown1
Nurul HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Wahyu MaulanaAffiliation unknown1
Ishma RaihanAffiliation unknown1
Irwansyah IrwansyahAffiliation unknown1
Jabbar SabilAffiliation unknown1
Rizkaul HasanahAffiliation unknown1
Delia UlfaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Ridwan HarahapAffiliation unknown1
Abidin NurdinAffiliation unknown1
Ali AbubakarAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/medsyar/oai, first harvested 7 Nov 2026, last seen 7 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Polarization of Judge Considerations in Waqf Disputes at Aceh's Syar'iyah Cour</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Abdullah, Arifin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sholihin, Riadhus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Habibi, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judge's Consideration</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Alternative Dispute Resolution</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Endowment</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">To protect waqf property, the Waqaf Law and KHI demand that waqf conflicts be settled peacefully to reach a win-win solution. However, Sharia Court judges still frequently decide waqf disputes in Aceh with a win-lose outcome; as a result, they do not protect waqf assets. This study evaluates Indonesian normative law using a qualitative method and court rulings. Field and library research yielded primary, secondary, and tertiary data. The study discovered three models of waqf conflicts in the Syar'iyah Court: waqf disputes that look at the parties' positions, which influences court evidence; waqf disputes that look at movable and immovable waqf assets; and models that look at both. Waqf property is either productive or unproductive. Second, the parties' reasons for settling the Waqf Dispute at Syar'iyah Court were: 1) Peace and 2) Interest factors to achieve legal certainty. Third, Syar'iyah Court judges only assess events, legal facts, and evidence in dispute settlement, not waqf asset protection. This research hopes to give Syar'iyah Court judges a legal umbrella to actively resolve waqf conflicts.Untuk melindungi harta benda wakaf, UU Waqaf dan KHI menuntut agar konflik wakaf diselesaikan secara damai untuk mencapai win-win solution. Namun, hakim Mahkamah Syariah masih sering memutuskan sengketa wakaf di Aceh dengan hasil menang-kalah; akibatnya, mereka tidak melindungi aset wakaf. Studi ini mengevaluasi hukum normatif Indonesia dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif dan putusan pengadilan. Penelitian lapangan dan kepustakaan menghasilkan data primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Studi ini menemukan tiga model konflik wakaf di Mahkamah Syar'iyah: sengketa wakaf yang melihat posisi para pihak, yang mempengaruhi pembuktian di pengadilan; sengketa wakaf yang menyangkut harta benda wakaf bergerak dan tidak bergerak; dan model yang melihat keduanya. Harta wakaf bisa produktif atau tidak produktif. Kedua, alasan para pihak menyelesaikan Sengketa Wakaf di Mahkamah Syar'iyah adalah: 1) Perdamaian dan 2) Faktor kepentingan untuk mencapai kepastian hukum. Ketiga, hakim Mahkamah Syar'iyah hanya menilai peristiwa, fakta hukum, dan bukti dalam penyelesaian sengketa, bukan perlindungan harta benda wakaf. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan payung hukum kepada hakim Mahkamah Syar'iyah untuk secara aktif menyelesaikan konflik wakaf.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-07-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/medsyar/article/view/16999</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/jms.v25i1.16999</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023); 148-169</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Media Syari'ah; Vol 25 No 1 (2023); 148-169</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2579-5090</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1411-2353</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/medsyar/article/view/16999/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/medsyar/article/view/16999/11327</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2023 Arifin Abdullah, Riadhus Sholihin, Muhammad Habibi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>