Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Tinjauan Hukum Islam tentang Pembebanan Mut’ah dan Nafkah Iddah terhadap Suami yang Murtad (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Nganjuk No: 1830/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Ngj) [Review of Islamic Law on The Imposition of Mut'ah and Living Iddah against Apostate Husbands (Case Study of Nganjuk Religious Court Decision No: 1830/Pdt.G/2016/PA. Ngj)]

Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam · Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019) · pp. 365–377

DOI
10.22373/sjhk.v3i2.5242
ISSN
2549-3167, 2549-3132
Published
2019-11-20
Publisher
Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
Language
eng

Abstract

When obligations do not work in a balanced manner in fostering a household, disputes and arguments often occurs which will result in the termination of a marriage. Divorce can occur by various factors in a marriage. One of the factors that divorce causesare one among apostate husbands or wives, which if the marriage continues to be maintained will cause loss. As a result of the divorce because the husband has lapsed into marriage, the marriage is immediately finished, and if the marriage is fulfilled, a wife will not get mut'ah and a living from her husband, but it is different from being practiced in a religious court whose husband is burdened with giving mut ' ah and livelihood iddah. So with the existence of these problems the author will review the judges' considerations in considering their decisions and reviewing Islamic law. This study aims to find out about the definition of Mut'ah, the livelihood of iddah and apostasy, to find out the legal basis used by the judge in deciding cases and what according to the views viewed from Islamic law.To answer these three problems, the researcher used a qualitative approach with field research that collected data directly from the source. In qualitative research, the researcher is faced directly with the respondent, namely a direct interview by the Judge in the Nganjuk Religious Court.Based on the research, even though the husband apostatized and married the husband was still obliged to give mut'ah and livelihood because even though the apostate's husband would not obstruct the husband's obligation to his wife, and the divorce divorce case was equated with ordinary divorce divorce. Judges use the basis of article 149, 117, with reasons for divorce article 116 letter (f) and (h) KHI (Compilation of Islamic Law) and the results of RAKERNAS MARI in 2005. and viewed from a review of Islamic law judges use volcanic jurisprudence II if the termination of marriage because of apostasy does not require a court decision or judge's decision and is immediately canceled and does not see the consequences of the apostasy.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 91 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universitas Jember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Kususanto Ditto PrihadiAffiliation unknown6
Lenny MarlindaAffiliation unknown3
Muhammad Al MuttaqiiAffiliation unknown3
Yan NurcahyaAffiliation unknown2
Sudibyo SudibyoAffiliation unknown2
Peri OktiarmiAffiliation unknown2
Sugeng PriyantoAffiliation unknown2
Indri YatiAffiliation unknown2
Zahari IshakAffiliation unknown2
Mujtahid MujtahidAffiliation unknown2
Mohammad PadilAffiliation unknown2
Astrid Noviana ParadhitaSebelas Maret University1
Mutiara Auliya KhadijaSebelas Maret University1
Agus PurbayuSebelas Maret University1
Sahirul Alim Tri BawonoSebelas Maret University1
Sri HaryatiSebelas Maret University1
Daaniis Raditya Pramoda WardaniSebelas Maret University1
Rafael Kurniawan Albyseptra PratamaSebelas Maret University1
Diana ZuhrohAffiliation unknown1
Wahyu LestariYogyakarta State University1
Sunarto SunartoAffiliation unknown1
Eko SugiartoAffiliation unknown1
Muh Fakhrihun NaamAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Ardi Wicaksana PutraAffiliation unknown1
Depi RusdaAffiliation unknown1
Khairul AnamUniversitas Jember1
Novriadi NovriadiAffiliation unknown1
Saliha SebgagAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Mujtaba Mitra ZuanaAffiliation unknown1
Ira SuryaniAffiliation unknown1
Kustiyono KustiyonoAffiliation unknown1
William Eric ManonggaAffiliation unknown1
Firda Nurul KhoiriyatulAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad KhumaediAffiliation unknown1
Eko SupraptonoAffiliation unknown1
Samsudin AnisAffiliation unknown1
Sendi AyuAffiliation unknown1
Gilang Arista PrastomoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/oai, first harvested 7 Nov 2026, last seen 7 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Tinjauan Hukum Islam tentang Pembebanan Mut’ah dan Nafkah Iddah terhadap Suami yang Murtad (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Nganjuk No: 1830/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Ngj) [Review of Islamic Law on The Imposition of Mut'ah and Living Iddah against Apostate Husbands (Case Study of Nganjuk Religious Court Decision No: 1830/Pdt.G/2016/PA. Ngj)]</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fitriani, Rika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Aziz, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Islamic Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Mut'ah</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Nafd Iddah</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Apostasy</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">When obligations do not work in a balanced manner in fostering a household, disputes and arguments often occurs which will result in the termination of a marriage.  Divorce can occur by various factors in a marriage.  One of the factors that divorce causesare one among apostate husbands or wives, which if the marriage continues to be maintained will cause loss. As a result of the divorce because the husband has lapsed into marriage, the marriage is immediately finished, and if the marriage is fulfilled, a wife will not get mut'ah and a living from her husband, but it is different from being practiced in a religious court whose husband is burdened with giving mut '  ah and livelihood iddah.  So with the existence of these problems the author will review the judges' considerations in considering their decisions and reviewing Islamic law. This study aims to find out about the definition of Mut'ah, the livelihood of iddah and apostasy, to find out the legal basis used by the judge in deciding cases and what according to the views viewed from Islamic law.To answer these three problems, the researcher used a qualitative approach with field research that collected data directly from the source.  In qualitative research, the researcher is faced directly with the respondent, namely a direct interview by the Judge in the Nganjuk Religious Court.Based on the research, even though the husband apostatized and married the husband was still obliged to give mut'ah and livelihood because even though the apostate's husband would not obstruct the husband's obligation to his wife, and the divorce divorce case was equated with ordinary divorce divorce.  Judges use the basis of article 149, 117, with reasons for divorce article 116 letter (f) and (h) KHI (Compilation of Islamic Law) and the results of RAKERNAS MARI in 2005. and viewed from a review of Islamic law judges use volcanic jurisprudence II if  the termination of marriage because of apostasy does not require a court decision or judge's decision and is immediately canceled and does not see the consequences of the apostasy. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-11-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/5242</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/sjhk.v3i2.5242</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; 365-377</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3167</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3132</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/5242/3555</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2019 Rika Fitriani, Abdul Aziz</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>