Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Milk Al-Yamin Concept as a Validity of Sexual Relationship in a Modern Context: an Analysis of Muhammad Syahrur's Thoughts

Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020) · pp. 337–359

DOI
10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.7068
ISSN
2549-3167, 2549-3132
Published
2020-12-28
Publisher
Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
Language
eng

Abstract

In the understanding of fiqh turats, the concept of milk al-yamin is affecting the legal protection for oppressed slaves during the Jahiliyah period. According to Syahrur, the concept of milk al-yamin had similarities and differences with the marriage contract. The similarity lies in the ability to have sexual relations, while the difference is that a marriage contract is not merely a sexual relationship, but it has a legal effect on the production of the rights and obligations of a husband and wife to build a family, and other social activities related to mushaharah. Milk al-yamin does not arrive at the emergence of rights and obligations as husband and wife as a result of a marriage contract. The concept of milk al-yamin that Syahrur understands for the present context is how the legal proposition (the Quran) remains suitable with the current era, not to be eradicated historically because it is no longer relevant. He built a new logic for the concept of milk al-yamin in the present context, which is called ‘aqd ihsan. The concept of milk al-yamin understood by Syahrur enables the authorization of contractual marriages or mut'ah which were abolished according to the Sunni school of fiqh. The concept of contract marriage or mut'ah does not have general marriage conditions, because the purpose is not to build a family, but purely sexual relations, and does not belong to the category of formal marriage, although at the same time it is not haram. In consequence, the concept of milk al-yamin is not becoming a basis for legitimizing nonmarital sexual relations.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

28 authors · 71 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Poltekkes Kemenkes Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Gamal AchyarAffiliation unknown2
Rahmadani RahmadaniAffiliation unknown1
Faisal FauzanAffiliation unknown1
Hajarul AkbarAffiliation unknown1
Ihdi Karim MakinaraAffiliation unknown1
Andi DarnaAffiliation unknown1
Wardana SaidAffiliation unknown1
Syahrizal AbbasAffiliation unknown1
Harnides HarnidesAffiliation unknown1
Saddam RassanjaniAffiliation unknown1
Dhaiful MubarrakAffiliation unknown1
Lukman HakimInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Khairani KhairaniAffiliation unknown1
Sayuthi M. AminAffiliation unknown1
Riza Afrian MustaqiemAffiliation unknown1
Aulil AmriAffiliation unknown1
Aisyah IdrisAffiliation unknown1
Mulia RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Soraya devyAffiliation unknown1
Mursyid DjawasAffiliation unknown1
Muntasir A KadirAffiliation unknown1
Yusfriadi AbdaAffiliation unknown1
Ridwan NurdinAffiliation unknown1
Mutiara FahmiAffiliation unknown1
Muslim ZainuddinAffiliation unknown1
Imanuddin ImanuddinPoltekkes Kemenkes Kendari1
Agustin HanapiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/oai, first harvested 7 Nov 2026, last seen 7 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Milk Al-Yamin Concept as a Validity of  Sexual Relationship in a Modern Context: an Analysis of Muhammad Syahrur's Thoughts</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hasballah, Khairuddin</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Milk Al-Yamin</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sexual Relations</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Modern Context</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">fiqh</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In the understanding of fiqh turats, the concept of milk al-yamin is affecting the legal protection for oppressed slaves during the Jahiliyah period. According to Syahrur, the concept of milk al-yamin had similarities and differences with the marriage contract. The similarity lies in the ability to have sexual relations, while the difference is that a marriage contract is not merely a sexual relationship, but it has a legal effect on the production of the rights and obligations of a husband and wife to build a family, and other social activities related to mushaharah. Milk al-yamin does not arrive at the emergence of rights and obligations as husband and wife as a result of a marriage contract. The concept of milk al-yamin that Syahrur understands for the present context is how the legal proposition (the Quran) remains suitable with the current era, not to be eradicated historically because it is no longer relevant. He built a new logic for the concept of milk al-yamin in the present context, which is called ‘aqd ihsan. The concept of milk al-yamin understood by Syahrur enables the authorization of contractual marriages or mut'ah which were abolished according to the Sunni school of fiqh. The concept of contract marriage or mut'ah does not have general marriage conditions, because the purpose is not to build a family, but purely sexual relations, and does not belong to the category of formal marriage, although at the same time it is not haram. In consequence, the concept of milk al-yamin is not becoming a basis for legitimizing nonmarital sexual relations.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-12-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/7068</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.7068</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; 337-359</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3167</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3132</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/7068/4928</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2020 Khairuddin Hasballah</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>