Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Sexual Violence in an Islamic Higher Education Institution of Indonesian: A Maqasid Al-Shariah and Foucauldian Perspective

Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021) · pp. 127–152

DOI
10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9144
ISSN
2549-3167, 2549-3132
Published
2021-06-30
Publisher
Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
Language
eng

Abstract

Sexual violence was prevalent in many settings, including in religious educational institutions. This article analyzed cases of sexual violence at an Islamic higher education institution in West Java, Indonesia, using the maqasid al-shariah and Foucault's theory of sexuality as the theoretical frameworks. This mixed-method research used Google form's surveys, in-depth interviews, and observations as the data collection methods. The data were analyzed using a flow model, which comprised selection, display, analysis or discussion, and conclusion. This study showed that verbal and non-verbal sexual violence was rampant. It occurred between student and student, lecturer and staff, staff and staff, and lecturer and student. Four models of sexual violence were found based on the typology designed by Dzeich and Weiner, who categorized thirteen forms of sexual violence. The maqasid al-shariah analysis outlined that sexual violence was against the fundamental values and objectives of sharia and human rights. Additionally, Foucault's theory identified patriarchal and cultural hegemony aspects in sexual violence. This study's intriguing part was the findings that combined in-depth interviews, observations, and surveys, intended to understand the intensity of existing cases. On the other hand, the power of analysis was centered on normative fiqh and sociological aspects. According to the literature reviews, these two approaches had not been administered by previous researchers.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

30 authors · 60 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Bani Syarif MaulaAffiliation unknown2
Adang KuswayaAffiliation unknown2
Siti ZumrotunAffiliation unknown2
Achmad MaimunAffiliation unknown2
Mahmuddin MahmuddinUniversitas Muslim Indonesia1
Delfi SugandaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Chairul HudaAffiliation unknown1
Abdul Qodir ShalehAffiliation unknown1
Saifudin ZuhriAffiliation unknown1
Endang SrianiAffiliation unknown1
Farid HasanAffiliation unknown1
Anggi PrasetyoAffiliation unknown1
Siti Malaiha DewiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Hasan SyamsudinAffiliation unknown1
Alwi AlatasAffiliation unknown1
Putra Halomoan HasibuanUniversitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan1
Puji KurniawanAffiliation unknown1
Budi Sastra PanjaitanAffiliation unknown1
Adi Syahputra SiraitAffiliation unknown1
Abdul WahidHasanuddin University1
Mohammad Azka Al AzkiyaAffiliation unknown1
Fatimah Lubabiyah Labib ShodiqAffiliation unknown1
Moh RosyidAffiliation unknown1
Lina KushidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Chairul HudaAffiliation unknown1
Nastangin NastanginAffiliation unknown1
Desi Norma SiamtinaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/oai, first harvested 7 Nov 2026, last seen 7 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Sexual Violence in an Islamic Higher Education Institution of Indonesian: A Maqasid Al-Shariah and Foucauldian Perspective</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Muhsin, Ilyya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ma’mun, Sukron</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nuroniyah, Wardah</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">sexual violence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">maqasid al-shariah</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">human rights</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">&amp; patriarchy.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Sexual violence was prevalent in many settings, including in religious educational institutions. This article analyzed cases of sexual violence at an Islamic higher education institution in West Java, Indonesia, using the maqasid al-shariah and Foucault's theory of sexuality as the theoretical frameworks. This mixed-method research used Google form's surveys, in-depth interviews, and observations as the data collection methods. The data were analyzed using a flow model, which comprised selection, display, analysis or discussion, and conclusion. This study showed that verbal and non-verbal sexual violence was rampant. It occurred between student and student, lecturer and staff, staff and staff, and lecturer and student. Four models of sexual violence were found based on the typology designed by Dzeich and Weiner, who categorized thirteen forms of sexual violence. The maqasid al-shariah analysis outlined that sexual violence was against the fundamental values and objectives of sharia and human rights. Additionally, Foucault's theory identified patriarchal and cultural hegemony aspects in sexual violence. This study's intriguing part was the findings that combined in-depth interviews, observations, and surveys, intended to understand the intensity of existing cases. On the other hand, the power of analysis was centered on normative fiqh and sociological aspects. According to the literature reviews, these two approaches had not been administered by previous researchers. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/9144</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9144</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; 127-152</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3167</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3132</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/9144/5735</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Ilyya Muhsin, Sukron Ma’mun, Wardah Nuroniyah</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>