Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Framing of the Board of Peace in Kompas.com and Tempo.co Media from a Gramscian Hegemony Perspective

Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu komunikasi · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 190–213

DOI
10.15575/cjik.v10i1.55756
ISSN
2549-8452
Published
2026-06-28
Publisher
Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Indonesia’s involvement in the Board of Peace (BoP) has generated public controversy regarding the consistency of its foreign policy in supporting Palestine. The debate intensified following pressure from the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), urging the government to reconsider its participation. Despite growing public attention, limited studies have explored how this issue is constructed within Indonesian media discourse. This study aims to analyze how Kompas.com and Tempo.co frame the BoP issue and how such framing reflects power relations and ideological processes. The research employs a qualitative approach using Robert N. Entman’s framing analysis, including problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. To enrich the analysis, this study integrates Gramscian hegemony and the propaganda model by Herman and Chomsky as interpretive frameworks. The data consist of news articles published by Kompas.com and Tempo.co between January - March 2026. The findings show that Kompas.com frames the BoP as a pragmatic diplomatic strategy open to evaluation, while Tempo.co emphasizes accountability and policy consistency toward Palestine. These differences indicate that media actively shape public understanding through selective narratives. Both media rely on elite sources, suggesting that public discourse remains structurally constrained. The study has implications for strengthening critical media literacy and understanding the role of the press in constructing Indonesia's foreign policy

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

36 authors · 69 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Gunadarma University
  • Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Encep DulwahabAffiliation unknown3
Zaenal MukaromAffiliation unknown2
Bella AmaliaGunadarma University1
Acep MuslimAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Rezaldy PuteraAffiliation unknown1
Dono DarsonoSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Zalfa ViastianaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad SalmanAffiliation unknown1
Rif'at Fatkhurrohman JaelaniAffiliation unknown1
Ikbalul AnwarAffiliation unknown1
Ikhsan HambaliAffiliation unknown1
muhamad muksin ahmadAffiliation unknown1
Angela Gaya NovikoAffiliation unknown1
Dyah Rahmi AstutiAffiliation unknown1
Aldi FadillahAffiliation unknown1
Prita Priantini Nur ChidayahAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad Faqih FauzieAffiliation unknown1
Syahda Adi RatnaAffiliation unknown1
Asep Saeful MuhtadiAffiliation unknown1
Putri Meilani CahyantiAffiliation unknown1
Betty TresnawatyAffiliation unknown1
Siti Alviatul AzizaAffiliation unknown1
Siska AyunitaAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad FuadAffiliation unknown1
Sheila NurhalisaAffiliation unknown1
Puput Aprilia HermawatiAffiliation unknown1
Salma SalmaAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad RajafiAffiliation unknown1
Naili AdilahAffiliation unknown1
Hamhij HamhijAffiliation unknown1
Hari PurnomoAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad HoesainAffiliation unknown1
Nanang Tri HaryadiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/cjik/oai, first harvested 7 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Framing of the Board of Peace in Kompas.com and Tempo.co Media from a Gramscian Hegemony Perspective</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Pitoyo, Pitoyo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ladiqi, Suyatno</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rosyidi , Imron</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Media Framing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Board of Peace</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Gramscian Hegemony</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Propaganda Model</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Indonesia’s involvement in the Board of Peace (BoP) has generated public controversy regarding the consistency of its foreign policy in supporting Palestine. The debate intensified following pressure from the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), urging the government to reconsider its participation. Despite growing public attention, limited studies have explored how this issue is constructed within Indonesian media discourse. This study aims to analyze how Kompas.com and Tempo.co frame the BoP issue and how such framing reflects power relations and ideological processes. The research employs a qualitative approach using Robert N. Entman’s framing analysis, including problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. To enrich the analysis, this study integrates Gramscian hegemony and the propaganda model by Herman and Chomsky as interpretive frameworks. The data consist of news articles published by Kompas.com and Tempo.co between January - March  2026. The findings show that Kompas.com frames the BoP as a pragmatic diplomatic strategy open to evaluation, while Tempo.co emphasizes accountability and policy consistency toward Palestine. These differences indicate that media actively shape public understanding through selective narratives. Both media rely on elite sources, suggesting that public discourse remains structurally constrained. The study has implications for strengthening critical media literacy and understanding the role of the press in constructing Indonesia's foreign policy</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/cjik/article/view/55756</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15575/cjik.v10i1.55756</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu komunikasi; Vol. 10 No. 1. June (2026): Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi; 190 - 213</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-8452</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15575/cjik.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/cjik/article/view/55756/17083</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Pitoyo Pitoyo</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>