Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN YANG DIBUAT SELAMA DALAM IKATAN PERKAWINAN TERHADAP UTANG BERSAMA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015

Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum · Vol. 26 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 95–117

ISSN
2549-4600, 0854-6509
Published
2018-08-15
Publisher
Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Under the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, a marriage agreement may only be made before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, marriage agreements may also be made during the period of marriage ties. The making of this marriage agreement certainly affects the joint property of husband and wife obtained in the marriage period before the marriage agreement is made. Including if the couple also has a debt together. This then raises problems related to debt settlement. The purpose of this study is to determine the juridical implications of marriage agreements made during the marriage bonds to the joint debt post-Decision of the Constitutional Court. This research is classified as normative juridical research using the concept of law and conceptual. The results of the study show that after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, which stipulates that a marriage agreement may be made during the period of marriage bonds related to the responsibility of the joint debt repayment arising prior to the marriage agreement, the settlement may be contracted as per the second agreement the husband and wife. This is because there are no rules that prohibit the existence of such clauses to be set forth in the marriage agreement. However, if a marriage agreement in which the settlement of the joint debt will result in harm to a third party then the marriage agreement is not allowed, as regulated in Article 29 paragraph (4) Act 1/1974.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 103 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Indonesia
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Setyo WidagdoAffiliation unknown3
Milda IstiqomahAffiliation unknown3
Moh. FadliAffiliation unknown2
Abdul MadjidAffiliation unknown2
Wahbi RahmanAffiliation unknown2
I Nyoman NurjayaAffiliation unknown2
Mustafa LutfiAffiliation unknown1
Syahriza Alkhoir AnggoroAffiliation unknown1
Mohd Hazmi Mohd RusliAffiliation unknown1
Sudarsono SudarsonoAffiliation unknown1
Ramalinggam RajamanickamAffiliation unknown1
Nandu DyanataAffiliation unknown1
Abdul Rachmad BudionoAffiliation unknown1
Tunggul AnshariAffiliation unknown1
M Nur SyafiuddinAffiliation unknown1
Rachmad Safa’atAffiliation unknown1
Istislam IstislamAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Edi WibowoAffiliation unknown1
Robert Lengkong WekuAffiliation unknown1
Noor Dzuhaidah OsmanAffiliation unknown1
Ariesta Wibisono AndityaAffiliation unknown1
Natalia MaharaniAffiliation unknown1
Sukardi SukardiUniversity of Indonesia1
Diah Pawestri MaharaniAffiliation unknown1
Mustafa LuthfiAffiliation unknown1
Adi KusumaningrumAffiliation unknown1
Lukman Yudho PrakosoAffiliation unknown1
Nuddin HarahabAffiliation unknown1
Fransiska Ayulistya SusantoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nurini ApriliandaAffiliation unknown1
Alfons ZakariaAffiliation unknown1
Julisa Aprilia KalukuAffiliation unknown1
Fatiha GourariAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad Fattah RiphatAffiliation unknown1
Alief RisyawanAffiliation unknown1
Fransiska A. SusantoAffiliation unknown1
Mohd Hazmi Mohd RusliAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/oai, first harvested 7 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN YANG DIBUAT SELAMA DALAM IKATAN PERKAWINAN TERHADAP UTANG BERSAMA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Putri, Priesty Yustika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Djatmika, Prija</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Puspitawati, Dhiana</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Marriage Agreement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Joint Debt</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Constitutional Court Decision</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Under the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, a marriage agreement may only be made before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, marriage agreements may also be made during the period of marriage ties. The making of this marriage agreement certainly affects the joint property of husband and wife obtained in the marriage period before the marriage agreement is made. Including if the couple also has a debt together. This then raises problems related to debt settlement. The purpose of this study is to determine the juridical implications of marriage agreements made during the marriage bonds to the joint debt post-Decision of the Constitutional Court. This research is classified as normative juridical research using the concept of law and conceptual. The results of the study show that after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, which stipulates that a marriage agreement may be made during the period of marriage bonds related to the responsibility of the joint debt repayment arising prior to the marriage agreement, the settlement may be contracted as per the second agreement the husband and wife. This is because there are no rules that prohibit the existence of such clauses to be set forth in the marriage agreement. However, if a marriage agreement in which the settlement of the joint debt will result in harm to a third party then the marriage agreement is not allowed, as regulated in Article 29 paragraph (4) Act 1/1974.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-08-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/6621</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2018): Maret; 95-117</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4600</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0854-6509</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/6621/5779</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Priesty Yustika Putri, Prija Djatmika, Dhiana Puspitawati</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>