Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Cryptocurrency as a Means of Gratification: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Digital Gratification in Islamic Criminal Law

Al-'Adalah · Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 363–406

DOI
10.24042/adalah.v231.28296
ISSN
2614-171X, 0854-1272
Published
2026-06-25
Publisher
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This study investigates whether cryptocurrency-based gratification can be legally classified as risywah under Islamic criminal law and analyzes how its characteristics differ from those of conventional gratification. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study utilizes statutory, conceptual, comparative, and prescriptive approaches. The statutory approach involves examining anti-corruption norms, Islamic criminal law principles, contemporary fatwas, and legal doctrines related to bribery and digital assets. The conceptual approach assesses cryptocurrency as māl and as an object of unlawful benefit, while the comparative approach evaluates conventional and digital gratification in terms of object, transfer mechanism, concealment pattern, evidentiary challenges, and legal consequences. Legal content analysis is conducted by interpreting classical fiqh doctrines, qawā‘id fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in the context of contemporary crypto-based transactions. The findings indicate that cryptocurrency gratification meets the substantive elements of risywah when it possesses economic value, is provided to influence public authority or judicial decision-making, and results in unfair advantage, even if transferred through intangible and decentralized digital mechanisms. The primary distinction between conventional and digital gratification lies in technological form, anonymity, cross-border nature, and evidentiary complexity, rather than legal nature. Consequently, crypto-based gratification should be treated as equivalent to conventional bribery under Islamic criminal law, based on the principle that legal consideration is determined by substance rather than form. The study contributes by proposing a functional-equivalence model of risywah that extends classical Islamic criminal law to digital gratification, thereby enhancing the relevance of fiqh jināyah in addressing corruption in the blockchain era.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 89 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ihsanul MaarifAffiliation unknown9
Lego KarjokoAffiliation unknown8
Kiki KristantoAffiliation unknown5
Anastasia Wahyu MurbaniAffiliation unknown5
Fatma Ulfatun NajichaAffiliation unknown4
Cece SuryanaAffiliation unknown4
Hartiwiningsih HartiwiningsihAffiliation unknown4
Zainal ArifinAffiliation unknown3
Aris HardinantoAffiliation unknown3
Bambang SantosoAffiliation unknown3
Ariesta Wibisono AndityaAffiliation unknown3
Anis WidyawatiAffiliation unknown3
Robi Assadul BahriAffiliation unknown3
Mikhael FekaAffiliation unknown2
Emi Puasa HandayaniAffiliation unknown2
Nahdiya SabrinaAffiliation unknown2
Panca Sarjana PutraAffiliation unknown2
Achmad CholidinAffiliation unknown2
Papontee TeeraphanAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al FikriAffiliation unknown2
Ravi DanendraAffiliation unknown2
Bunyamin BunyaminState University of Semarang2
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown2
Willy Naresta HanumAffiliation unknown2
Jaco BarkhuizenAffiliation unknown2
Abdul Kadir JaelaniAffiliation unknown2
Joice SorayaAffiliation unknown1
PujiyonoAffiliation unknown1
R.B SulartoAffiliation unknown1
Ana Tasia PaseAffiliation unknown1
Hendri DwiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Agus ManfaluthiAffiliation unknown1
Timotius Febry Cristian Wahyu SutrisnoAffiliation unknown1
Trinas Dewi HariyanaAffiliation unknown1
Ali Huristak Hartawan HasibuanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/adalah/oai, first harvested 8 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Cryptocurrency as a Means of Gratification: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Digital Gratification in Islamic Criminal Law</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Priyono, Erwan Adi </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rustamaji, Muhammad </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fernando, Zico Junius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en"> Arifin, Firdaus</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Cryptocurrency</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Gratification</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en"> fiqh jināyah</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">risywah</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study investigates whether cryptocurrency-based gratification can be legally classified as risywah under Islamic criminal law and analyzes how its characteristics differ from those of conventional gratification. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study utilizes statutory, conceptual, comparative, and prescriptive approaches. The statutory approach involves examining anti-corruption norms, Islamic criminal law principles, contemporary fatwas, and legal doctrines related to bribery and digital assets. The conceptual approach assesses cryptocurrency as māl and as an object of unlawful benefit, while the comparative approach evaluates conventional and digital gratification in terms of object, transfer mechanism, concealment pattern, evidentiary challenges, and legal consequences. Legal content analysis is conducted by interpreting classical fiqh doctrines, qawā‘id fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in the context of contemporary crypto-based transactions. The findings indicate that cryptocurrency gratification meets the substantive elements of risywah when it possesses economic value, is provided to influence public authority or judicial decision-making, and results in unfair advantage, even if transferred through intangible and decentralized digital mechanisms. The primary distinction between conventional and digital gratification lies in technological form, anonymity, cross-border nature, and evidentiary complexity, rather than legal nature. Consequently, crypto-based gratification should be treated as equivalent to conventional bribery under Islamic criminal law, based on the principle that legal consideration is determined by substance rather than form. The study contributes by proposing a functional-equivalence model of risywah that extends classical Islamic criminal law to digital gratification, thereby enhancing the relevance of fiqh jināyah in addressing corruption in the blockchain era.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/adalah/article/view/28296</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24042/adalah.v231.28296</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Al-'Adalah; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): Al-'Adalah; 363-406</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">al-'adalah; Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Al-'Adalah; 363-406</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2614-171X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0854-1272</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24042/adalah.v23.i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/adalah/article/view/28296/11347</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Erwan Adi  Priyono, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi  Handayani, Muhammad  Rustamaji, Zico Junius Fernando, Firdaus  Arifin</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>