Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

ONTOLOGICAL MISCONCEPTION IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Infinity Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020)

DOI
10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p15-30
ISSN
2460-9285, 2089-6867
Published
2020-01-30
Publisher
IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Elementary school teachers in Indonesia are required to master many subjects to be taught to their students. It is undeniable that the teachers’ mastery of knowledge (material) in some subjects inadequate. Therefore, it is worth to argue that there was a misconception in mathematics teaching in elementary schools. This research was designed using a qualitative approach. The participants of this study were 30 elementary school teachers in Semarang city area, Central Java province, Indonesia. The research data were obtained through questionnaires, and interviews. The purpose of the study was to discuss the types and causes of the misconception of mathematics teaching in elementary schools. Alternative solutions were also presented to problem-solving so that misconceptions do not occur anymore in mathematics teaching. The findings show that, teachers evenly experience types of misconceptions: (1) pre-conception, (2) under-generalization, (3) over-generalization, (4) modelling error, (5) prototyping error; and (6) process-object error in teaching mathematics in elementary schools. Some misconceptions have taken root and are difficult to remove, called "ontological misconceptions" because of teachers' years of belief that the knowledge they received was true when in fact it was not quite right.

Collaboration network of the authors

12 authors · 21 co-authorship links · 9 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nila UbaidahSultan Agung Islamic University3
Muhammad Win AfganiUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang2
Jero Budi DarmayasaIndonesia University of Education2
Mohamad AminudinSultan Agung Islamic University2
Nurkaromah DwidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Hardi SuyitnoState University of Semarang1
Dwijanto DwijantoState University of Semarang1
Kartinah KartinahUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Evi ChamalahSultan Agung Islamic University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2460-9285/works, first harvested 28 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>ONTOLOGICAL MISCONCEPTION IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS</dc:title><dc:creator>Kusmaryono, Imam</dc:creator><dc:creator>Basir, Mochamad Abdul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Saputro, Bagus Ardi</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Elementary school teachers in Indonesia are required to master many subjects to be taught to their students. It is undeniable that the teachers’ mastery of knowledge (material) in some subjects inadequate. Therefore, it is worth to argue that there was a misconception in mathematics teaching in elementary schools. This research was designed using a qualitative approach. The participants of this study were 30 elementary school teachers in Semarang city area, Central Java province, Indonesia. The research data were obtained through questionnaires, and interviews. The purpose of the study was to discuss the types and causes of the misconception of mathematics teaching in elementary schools. Alternative solutions were also presented to problem-solving so that misconceptions do not occur anymore in mathematics teaching. The findings show that, teachers evenly experience types of misconceptions: (1) pre-conception, (2) under-generalization, (3) over-generalization, (4) modelling error, (5) prototyping error; and (6) process-object error in teaching mathematics in elementary schools. Some misconceptions have taken root and are difficult to remove, called "ontological misconceptions" because of teachers' years of belief that the knowledge they received was true when in fact it was not quite right.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>IKIP Siliwangi Bandung</dc:publisher><dc:date>2020-01-30</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p15-30</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p15-30</dc:identifier><dc:source>Infinity Journal; Vol 9 No 1 (2020); 15</dc:source><dc:source>2460-9285</dc:source><dc:source>2089-6867</dc:source><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>