Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal SINTA 1

WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE, A MIND MAP OR A CONCEPT MAP LEARNING STRATEGY?

Cakrawala Pendidikan · Vol. 40 No. 2 (2021) · pp. 520–531

DOI
10.21831/cp.v40i2.33031
ISSN
2442-8620, 0216-1370
Published
2021-06-17
Publisher
LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Language
eng

Abstract

A mind map and a concept map learning strategy are two learning strategies that are often used to improve students' learning achievement. This study aimed to describe the differences in learning achievement between students who studied with a mind map learning strategy and those who used the concept map learning strategy, as well as the students' responses toward the learning strategy applied. This type of study was a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest control group design. The methods used in this study were a test and a questionnaire. Data of students' learning achievement were analyzed using inferential statistics of covariance analysis, while data of students' responses were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The results of the study indicated that there were significant differences in the learning achievement between students who used the mind map learning strategy and those who studied with the concept map learning strategy. Those who used the mind map learning strategy had better achievements than those using the concept map learning strategy. In addition, the students' responses were more positive toward the mind map learning strategy than to the concept map learning strategy.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 101 co-authorship links · 25 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Yıldız Technical University
  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • State University of Jakarta
  • National Taiwan Normal University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Andi SuhandiIndonesia University of Education5
Nuzulira Janeusse FratiwiIndonesia University of Education3
Agus SetiawanIndonesia University of Education2
B. CostuYıldız Technical University2
Ida Bagus Nyoman SudriaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha2
Lilik HasanahIndonesia University of Education2
Winny LiliawatiIndonesia University of Education2
Duden SaepuzamanAffiliation unknown2
Judhistira Aria UtamaAffiliation unknown2
Bayram CostuAffiliation unknown2
Nur KholifahAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad NurtantoAffiliation unknown2
Ida KaniawatiIndonesia University of Education2
Endi SuhendiAffiliation unknown2
Ari WidodoIndonesia University of Education2
Putu SudiraAffiliation unknown2
WahyudiAffiliation unknown1
Yusri KaminUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Eka MurdaniIndonesia University of Education1
M. MuslimIndonesia University of Education1
Irwanto IrwantoState University of Jakarta1
Bevo WahonoNational Taiwan Normal University1
I Wayan SujaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
I Nyoman SuardanaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
Sri HaryaniState University of Semarang1
I. HidayatAffiliation unknown1
L. M. MertaAffiliation unknown1
Mohd Zaidi Bin AmiruddinIndonesia University of Education1
Nila ApriliyantiAffiliation unknown1
Bayram ÇoştuYıldız Technical University1
Erwina OktaviantyTanjungpura University1
Almas SafanahIndonesia University of Education1
Lina AviyantiIndonesia University of Education1
Tika NurmalatikaAffiliation unknown1
Ilham Novian PratamaAffiliation unknown1
Bagus Dwi CahynoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/oai, first harvested 8 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE, A MIND MAP OR A CONCEPT MAP LEARNING STRATEGY?</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Redhana, I Wayan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widiastari, Kadek</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Samsudin, Achmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Irwanto, Irwanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">concept maps</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">learning achievement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">learning strategy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">mind maps.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">A mind map and a concept map learning strategy are two learning strategies that are often used to improve students' learning achievement. This study aimed to describe the differences in learning achievement between students who studied with a mind map learning strategy and those who used the concept map learning strategy, as well as the students' responses toward the learning strategy applied. This type of study was a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest control group design. The methods used in this study were a test and a questionnaire. Data of students' learning achievement were analyzed using inferential statistics of covariance analysis, while data of students' responses were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The results of the study indicated that there were significant differences in the learning achievement between students who used the mind map learning strategy and those who studied with the concept map learning strategy. Those who used the mind map learning strategy had better achievements than those using the concept map learning strategy. In addition, the students' responses were more positive toward the mind map learning strategy than to the concept map learning strategy.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-06-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/33031</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/cp.v40i2.33031</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan; Vol. 40 No. 2 (2021): Cakrawala Pendidikan (June 2021); 520-531</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-8620</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0216-1370</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/33031/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>