Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal SINTA 1

Analysis of the online microteaching practice of undergraduate physical education students

Cakrawala Pendidikan · Vol. 44 No. 1 (2025) · pp. 63–71

DOI
10.21831/cp.v44i1.61743
ISSN
2442-8620, 0216-1370
Published
2025-01-31
Publisher
LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Language
eng

Abstract

Microteaching aims to ensure that students, as prospective educators, deserve to experience real teaching-learning situations. However, in light of recent advancements in educational technology and the increasing integration of online learning, it has been carried out online. This study aims to analyze students' competence in the online microteaching practice. This is classroom action research with three determined indicators as the basis for constructing a Likert scale questionnaire. 132/150 students are participating in this study. A descriptive statistical test was used to analyze the data, and students' opinions were also recorded to strengthen the results. Almost all students (98.4%) pretty much understand the microteaching practice, and quite well (97.7%) understand how to use the online application for online microteaching practice. Also, they are satisfied (99.9%) with the quality of online microteaching practices. In simple real-life learning practices, of the 132 respondents, only 68.1% mastered the characteristics of their students, 60.6% applied learning tools, and 60.6% implemented periodic assessments. We concluded that students' competence towards online microteaching practice is good, and they know the advantages and disadvantages of conducting an online class. However, the skills demonstrated by students in online situations were different and inconsistent with those exhibited in offline settings.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 291 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Setya RahayuAffiliation unknown16
Heny SetyawatiAffiliation unknown15
Mugiyo HartonoAffiliation unknown14
Sugiharto SugihartoAffiliation unknown8
Ipang SetiawanAffiliation unknown8
Martin SudarmonoAffiliation unknown8
Harry PramonoAffiliation unknown8
Dwi Gansar Santi WijayantiAffiliation unknown8
Soegiyanto SoegiyantoAffiliation unknown7
Agung WahyudiAffiliation unknown7
Cahyo YuwonoAffiliation unknown7
Agus PujiantoAffiliation unknown7
Mohammad Arif AliAffiliation unknown6
RuminiAffiliation unknown6
Moch Fahmi AbdulazizAffiliation unknown6
Soegiyanto KSAffiliation unknown5
Roas IrsyadaAffiliation unknown5
Adi SAffiliation unknown5
Tri RustiadiAffiliation unknown5
Dwi Tiga PutriAffiliation unknown4
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang4
Agus DarmawanAffiliation unknown4
Endang Sri HananiAffiliation unknown4
Gustiana Mega AnggitaAffiliation unknown4
Hari SetijonoAffiliation unknown3
Nasuka NasukaAffiliation unknown3
SupriyonoAffiliation unknown3
SulaimanAffiliation unknown3
SoedjatmikoAffiliation unknown3
Oktia Woro Kasmini HandayaniAffiliation unknown3
Rumini RuminiAffiliation unknown3
Fery DarmantoAffiliation unknown3

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/oai, first harvested 8 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analysis of the online microteaching practice of undergraduate physical education students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Raharjo, Hermawan Pamot</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kusuma, Donny Wira Yudha</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mohamed, Ani Mazlina Dewi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rahayu, Tandiyo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Annas, Mohamad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Putra, Ranu Baskora Aji</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suripto, Agus Widodo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kurniawan, Wahyu Ragil</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">online classes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">affective domain</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">teaching-learning activities</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Microteaching aims to ensure that students, as prospective educators, deserve to experience real teaching-learning situations. However, in light of recent advancements in educational technology and the increasing integration of online learning, it has been carried out online. This study aims to analyze students' competence in the online microteaching practice. This is classroom action research with three determined indicators as the basis for constructing a Likert scale questionnaire. 132/150 students are participating in this study. A descriptive statistical test was used to analyze the data, and students' opinions were also recorded to strengthen the results. Almost all students (98.4%) pretty much understand the microteaching practice, and quite well (97.7%) understand how to use the online application for online microteaching practice. Also, they are satisfied (99.9%) with the quality of online microteaching practices. In simple real-life learning practices, of the 132 respondents, only 68.1% mastered the characteristics of their students, 60.6% applied learning tools, and 60.6% implemented periodic assessments. We concluded that students' competence towards online microteaching practice is good, and they know the advantages and disadvantages of conducting an online class. However, the skills demonstrated by students in online situations were different and inconsistent with those exhibited in offline settings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-01-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/61743</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/cp.v44i1.61743</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2025): Cakrawala Pendidikan (February 2025); 63-71</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-8620</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0216-1370</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/61743/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Hermawan Pamot Raharjo, Mohammad Arif Ali, Tandiyo Rahayu, Ani Mazlina Dewi Mohamed, Leo Nacion Santillana, Donny Wira Yudha Kusuma, Mohamad Annas, Ranu Baskora Aji Putra, Agus Widodo Suripto, Wahyu Ragil Kurniawan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>