Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

INVESTIGATION OF STUDENTS' BEHAVIOR IN MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING

Infinity Journal · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021)

DOI
10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p235-258
ISSN
2460-9285, 2089-6867
Published
2021-07-28
Publisher
IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This study is a qualitative research by using the descriptive method that aims to examine the behaviour of eighteen students in Bandung, Indonesia. Six issues related to geometry were given to eighteen of second-grade junior high school students with heterogeneous abilities. The problems given to the students contained all of the problem-solving strategies such as guessing and checking, make a picture, make a list, make a table, working backwards, looking patterns, and using a logical reason, solving simple problems and making questions. Data collection was conducted through mathematical problem-solving tests, recording students’ presentations, and interviewing among researchers and students after doing the problems. The result of recording was a video during the presentation process, and the interview would explore their understanding of the given problems to see the behaviour used by subjects of the research. The data in this research showed that many students’ behaviour identified; in the relevant literature, there are terms of the behaviour of problem-solving naive, routine, and sophisticated. However, the category "naïve," "routine," and "sophisticated" did not fully draw various behaviours observed, it was obtained additional category termed behavioural problem solver "naïve," "routine," "semi-sophisticated" and "sophisticated". It was due to the category of regular students can be divided into two, some students can be directed, and some of them cannot be directed to sophisticated behaviour. Thus, the routine category can be classified into two categories: routine and semi-sophisticated.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 105 co-authorship links · 48 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Tadulako University
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hamdani SyaputraUniversitas Negeri Padang8
Euis Eti RohaetiIKIP Siliwangi5
Rully Charitas Indra PrahmanaUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan5
Ahmad FauzanUniversitas Negeri Padang4
Hafizatunnisa HafizatunnisaUniversitas Negeri Padang4
Surya Amami PramudityaUniversitas Swadaya Gunung Jati4
Heris HendrianaIKIP Siliwangi3
Fitrani DwinaUniversitas Negeri Padang3
Wahyudin WahyudinTadulako University3
Fridgo TasmanUniversitas Negeri Padang2
Aqilul AsraUniversitas Negeri Padang2
Mazlini AdnanSultan Idris Education University2
Wahyu HartonoUniversitas Swadaya Gunung Jati2
Mohammad Dadan SundawanUniversitas Swadaya Gunung Jati2
Yudrick Maulana FiqriUniversitas Swadaya Gunung Jati2
Tommy Tanu WijayaBeijing Normal University2
Masta HutajuluIKIP Siliwangi2
Mohd Hasril AmiruddinTun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia2
Usman AripinIKIP Siliwangi2
Suherman SuhermanUniversitas Negeri Padang2
Adi NurjamanIndonesia University of Education1
Dadang JuandiIndonesia University of Education1
Edi SupriyadiIndonesia University of Education1
Darhim DarhimIndonesia University of Education1
Sufyani PrabawantoIndonesia University of Education1
Jarnawi Afgani DahlanIndonesia University of Education1
Nanang PriatnaIndonesia University of Education1
Delsi KarimanUniversitas PGRI Sumatera Barat1
Anny SoviaUniversitas PGRI Sumatera Barat1
Ratu Ilma Indra PutriSriwijaya University1
Agie GinanjarAffiliation unknown1
ArmiatiAffiliation unknown1
Febrina Sya’baniUniversitas Prima Nusantara Bukittinggi1
Brian R. EvansPace University1
Toyo WiyatnoUniversitas Jenderal Achmad Yani1
Edwin MusdiUniversitas Negeri Padang1
ArnellisAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2460-9285/works, first harvested 28 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>INVESTIGATION OF STUDENTS' BEHAVIOR IN MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING</dc:title><dc:creator>Harisman, Yulyanti</dc:creator><dc:creator>Noto, Muchamad Subali</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hidayat, Wahyu</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study is a qualitative research by using the descriptive method that aims to examine the behaviour of eighteen students in Bandung, Indonesia. Six issues related to geometry were given to eighteen of second-grade junior high school students with heterogeneous abilities. The problems given to the students contained all of the problem-solving strategies such as guessing and checking, make a picture, make a list, make a table, working backwards, looking patterns, and using a logical reason, solving simple problems and making questions. Data collection was conducted through mathematical problem-solving tests, recording students’ presentations, and interviewing among researchers and students after doing the problems. The result of recording was a video during the presentation process, and the interview would explore their understanding of the given problems to see the behaviour used by subjects of the research. The data in this research showed that many students’ behaviour identified; in the relevant literature, there are terms of the behaviour of problem-solving naive, routine, and sophisticated. However, the category "naïve," "routine," and "sophisticated" did not fully draw various behaviours observed, it was obtained additional category termed behavioural problem solver "naïve," "routine," "semi-sophisticated" and "sophisticated". It was due to the category of regular students can be divided into two, some students can be directed, and some of them cannot be directed to sophisticated behaviour. Thus, the routine category can be classified into two categories: routine and semi-sophisticated.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>IKIP Siliwangi Bandung</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021-07-28</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p235-258</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p235-258</dc:identifier><dc:source>Infinity Journal; Vol 10 No 2 (2021); 235</dc:source><dc:source>2460-9285</dc:source><dc:source>2089-6867</dc:source><dc:relation>http://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/viewFile/2519/1234</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>