Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Comparison algorithms with optimization for clustering multi-criteria

IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · Vol. 15 No. 4 (2026) · pp. 3476–3491

DOI
10.11591/ijai.v15.i4.pp3476-3491
ISSN
2252-8938, 2089-4872
Published
2026-08-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

In higher education, forecasting student graduation is crucial for early intervention development, policy formulation, and class planning. This categorizes the factors that affect student graduation according to both academic and non-academic traits. To compare various clustering techniques, such as K-means, fuzzy C-means (FCM), K-medoids, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), spectral clustering, Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and deep learning (DL), as well as particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) optimization for K-means and FCM, this article applies the hybrid elbow + silhouette optimization prior to the clustering process. Two clusters were found in the pre-cluster optimization research results. K-means, FCM, GMM, and DL clustering all demonstrated more distinct centroid separation; K-means and GMM were the most visually stable and comprehensible. Inter-cluster separation is the main goal of post-cluster optimization, and the K-means + PSO method is the best option. The cross-dataset validation findings indicate that the clustering model exhibits moderate consistency on the new dataset, with an adjusted Rand index (ARI) of 0.478 and a normalized mutual information (NMI) of 0.433.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 87 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sri RahmiAffiliation unknown2
Juminten SaiminAffiliation unknown1
Asmarani AsmaraniAffiliation unknown1
Satrio WicaksonoAffiliation unknown1
Nanang EndriatnoUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Budiman SudiaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Mulyati MulyatiAffiliation unknown1
Padeli PadeliAffiliation unknown1
Siska DeboraAffiliation unknown1
Meutia NurfahasdiAffiliation unknown1
Silda Adi RahayuAffiliation unknown1
Derry Wiliyanda NasutionAffiliation unknown1
Dally Raj SinghAffiliation unknown1
Agnes Yofita ZegaAffiliation unknown1
Agree Manganju Evannels SilalahiAffiliation unknown1
Robi Arianta SembiringAffiliation unknown1
Lailatussaadah LailatussaadahAffiliation unknown1
Afra NadilaAffiliation unknown1
Baihaqi BaihaqiAffiliation unknown1
Mirza Adia NovaAffiliation unknown1
Reni KumalasariAffiliation unknown1
Siti AisyahAffiliation unknown1
Muthmainnah IsmailAffiliation unknown1
Heliati FajriahAffiliation unknown1
Lina AmeliaAffiliation unknown1
Zahratul FitriAffiliation unknown1
Eka UtaminingsihAffiliation unknown1
Ichwana RamliAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad KalbadriAffiliation unknown1
Ressa Fitra AdindaAffiliation unknown1
Fauzi Muhammad DjunedAffiliation unknown1
Mariana MarianaAffiliation unknown1
Endy SetiawanAffiliation unknown1
Cut Meurah RosnellyAffiliation unknown1
Rafi MariskaAffiliation unknown1
Erisna MirdaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Ernanda TaufiqAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/oai, first harvested 8 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Comparison algorithms with optimization for clustering multi-criteria</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mulyadi, Ida</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Abdul Rahman, Titik Khawa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faisal, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US"></dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Elbow; Fuzzy C-means; K-means; Optimization; Silhouette</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In higher education, forecasting student graduation is crucial for early intervention development, policy formulation, and class planning. This categorizes the factors that affect student graduation according to both academic and non-academic traits. To compare various clustering techniques, such as K-means, fuzzy C-means (FCM), K-medoids, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), spectral clustering, Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and deep learning (DL), as well as particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) optimization for K-means and FCM, this article applies the hybrid elbow + silhouette optimization prior to the clustering process. Two clusters were found in the pre-cluster optimization research results. K-means, FCM, GMM, and DL clustering all demonstrated more distinct centroid separation; K-means and GMM were the most visually stable and comprehensible. Inter-cluster separation is the main goal of post-cluster optimization, and the K-means + PSO method is the best option. The cross-dataset validation findings indicate that the clustering model exhibits moderate consistency on the new dataset, with an adjusted Rand index (ARI) of 0.478 and a normalized mutual information (NMI) of 0.433.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar</dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2026-08-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/article/view/30202</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijai.v15.i4.pp3476-3491</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI); Vol 15, No 4: August 2026; 3476-3491</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8938</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4872</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijai.v15.i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/article/view/30202/15313</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Ida Mulyadi, Titik Khawa Abdul Rahman, Muhammad Faisal</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>