Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Enhancing breast cancer diagnosis: a comparative analysis of feature selection techniques

IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024) · pp. 4312–4322

DOI
10.11591/ijai.v13.i4.pp4312-4322
ISSN
2252-8938, 2089-4872
Published
2024-12-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Breast cancer is a significant contributor to female mortality, emphasizing the importance of early detection. Predicting breast cancer accurately remains a complex challenge within medical data analysis. Machine learning (ML) algorithms offer valuable assistance in decision-making and diagnosis using medical data. Numerous research studies highlight the effectiveness of ML techniques in improving breast cancer prediction. Feature selection plays a pivotal role in data preprocessing, eliminating irrelevant and redundant features to minimize feature count and improve classification accuracy. This study focuses on optimizing breast cancer diagnostics through feature selection methods, specifically genetic algorithms (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The research involves a comparative analysis of these methods and the application of a diverse set of ML classification techniques, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and ensemble methods like random forest (RF), AdaBoost, and gradient boosting (GB), using a breast cancer dataset. The models' performance is subsequently evaluated using various performance metrics. The experimental findings illustrate that PSO achieved the highest average accuracy, reaching 99.6% when applied to AdaBoost, while GA attained an accuracy rate of 99.5% when employed with both AdaBoost and RF.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

31 authors · 81 co-authorship links · 9 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Hassan II Casablanca
  • Mohammed V University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Mohammed AmraouyMohammed V University3
Ihsane HaloumUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca3
Mostafa JebbarUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca3
Bouchaib AylajAffiliation unknown2
El Mehdi BellfkihAffiliation unknown2
Mohammed El AssadAffiliation unknown2
Imrane Chemseddine IdrissiAffiliation unknown2
Jamal Eddine RafiqUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca2
Abdellah BennaneMohammed V University2
Abdelaziz MarzakUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca2
Issam Abderrahman JoundanUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Mohamed AzouaziUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Abdelwahed NamirUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Seddiq El Kasmi AlaouiUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Zouhair ChibaUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Hamza FahamUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Mohammed El AssadUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Mostafa BelkasmiMohammed V University1
Imrane Chemseddine IdrissiAffiliation unknown1
Seddiq El Kasmi AlaouiAffiliation unknown1
Mohamed AzzouaziAffiliation unknown1
Khalid LouartitiAffiliation unknown1
Jamal MoulineAffiliation unknown1
Assia NajmAffiliation unknown1
Mustapha HainUniversity of Hassan II Casablanca1
Ali IdriMohammed V University1
Jamal Eddine RafiqAffiliation unknown1
Zakrani AbdelaliAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/oai, first harvested 8 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Enhancing breast cancer diagnosis: a comparative analysis of feature selection techniques</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Benghazouani, Salsabila</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nouh, Said</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Zakrani, Abdelali</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">machine learning</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Breast cancer; Classification; Feature selection; Genetic algorithm; Particle swarm optimization</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Breast cancer is a significant contributor to female mortality, emphasizing the importance of early detection. Predicting breast cancer accurately remains a complex challenge within medical data analysis. Machine learning (ML) algorithms offer valuable assistance in decision-making and diagnosis using medical data. Numerous research studies highlight the effectiveness of ML techniques in improving breast cancer prediction. Feature selection plays a pivotal role in data preprocessing, eliminating irrelevant and redundant features to minimize feature count and improve classification accuracy. This study focuses on optimizing breast cancer diagnostics through feature selection methods, specifically genetic algorithms (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The research involves a comparative analysis of these methods and the application of a diverse set of ML classification techniques, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and ensemble methods like random forest (RF), AdaBoost, and gradient boosting (GB), using a breast cancer dataset. The models' performance is subsequently evaluated using various performance metrics. The experimental findings illustrate that PSO achieved the highest average accuracy, reaching 99.6% when applied to AdaBoost, while GA attained an accuracy rate of 99.5% when employed with both AdaBoost and RF.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2024-12-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/article/view/24792</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijai.v13.i4.pp4312-4322</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI); Vol 13, No 4: December 2024; 4312-4322</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8938</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4872</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijai.v13.i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/article/view/24792/14323</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>