Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Creative reality counseling model: Acceptability and effectiveness at improving self-regulated learning

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023) · pp. 1290–1298

DOI
10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24755
ISSN
2620-5440, 2252-8822
Published
2023-09-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Counselors use the reality counselling model to help counselees overcome their problems, including the problem of self-regulated learning. As professionals, it is necessary for them to identify the elements that can improve the success rate of this model. One of the elements is creative art, and its use in integration with the aforementioned model will form what is termed creative reality counseling model. The aim of this article was to identify the acceptability and effectiveness of the creative reality counseling model to improve self-regulated learning. Borg and Gall’s research and development design was a preferred design for this research, with the involvement of a total of five stages, namely: i) Problem identification;ii) Planning; iii) Product hypothesis drafting; iv) Expert and practitioner judgments; and v) Effectiveness testing. The acceptability of the product was analyzed using the interrater reliability Cohen’s kappa, while the effectiveness was identified using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The research results showed that the creative reality counseling model was acceptable and effective at improving students’ self-regulated learning. These results may offer alternative counseling good practices for counselors to develop students’ self-regulated learning.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

32 authors · 95 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Prima Suci RohmadhenyAffiliation unknown3
Nur HidayahPoliteknik Negeri Ujung Pandang2
Agus SupriyantoAffiliation unknown2
Trikinasih HandayaniAffiliation unknown2
Waharjani WaharjaniAffiliation unknown2
Farah HariyadiAffiliation unknown1
Imam ThohariAffiliation unknown1
Nurhidayati NurhidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Sri Hertanti WulanAffiliation unknown1
Avi MeilawatiAffiliation unknown1
Venny Indria EkowatiAffiliation unknown1
Doni Dwi HartantoAffiliation unknown1
Galang PrastowoAffiliation unknown1
Ghis Nggar DwiadmojoAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad RamliUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Adi AtmokoAffiliation unknown1
Farid SuryantoAffiliation unknown1
Agungbudiprabowo AgungbudiprabowoAffiliation unknown1
Salleh AmatAffiliation unknown1
Arif Budi PrasetyaAffiliation unknown1
Yuliyanti Indriani RahayuAffiliation unknown1
Moh. Irma SukarelawanUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan1
Dian Artha KusumaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Syahriandi AdhantoroAffiliation unknown1
Dewi Afra KhairunnisaAffiliation unknown1
Endang NurhayatiAffiliation unknown1
Yusuf Nur KholiqAffiliation unknown1
Mustikasari MustikasariAffiliation unknown1
Achir Yani S. HamidAffiliation unknown1
Ria Utami PanjaitanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/oai, first harvested 8 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Creative reality counseling model: Acceptability and effectiveness at improving self-regulated learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Purwadi, Purwadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Saputra, Wahyu Nanda Eka</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Creative art; Reality counseling; Self-regulated learning</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Counselors use the reality counselling model to help counselees overcome their problems, including the problem of self-regulated learning. As professionals, it is necessary for them to identify the elements that can improve the success rate of this model. One of the elements is creative art, and its use in integration with the aforementioned model will form what is termed creative reality counseling model. The aim of this article was to identify the acceptability and effectiveness of the creative reality counseling model to improve self-regulated learning. Borg and Gall’s research and development design was a preferred design for this research, with the involvement of a total of five stages, namely: i) Problem identification;ii) Planning; iii) Product hypothesis drafting; iv) Expert and practitioner judgments; and v) Effectiveness testing. The acceptability of the product was analyzed using the interrater reliability Cohen’s kappa, while the effectiveness was identified using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The research results showed that the creative reality counseling model was acceptable and effective at improving students’ self-regulated learning. These results may offer alternative counseling good practices for counselors to develop students’ self-regulated learning.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2023-09-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/24755</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24755</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE); Vol 12, No 3: September 2023; 1290-1298</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-5440</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8822</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijere.v12i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/24755/13630</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>