Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Assessment of kinematic concepts comprehension: A systematic review

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023) · pp. 1449–1459

DOI
10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24546
ISSN
2620-5440, 2252-8822
Published
2023-09-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

A systematic study on the development of the assessment instrument of the concept of kinematics which is one of the basic concepts of physics has not yet been conducted. This systematic study reported the characteristics, quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the instrument assessment regarding the concept of kinematics. This systematic review method has used a systematic approach based on the practical guidelines of systematic reviews by Petticrew and Roberts and has used PRISMA diagrams for the process of searching and selecting articles, who reviewed 12 articles published between 1985 and 2021. The research findings show that the instrument of concept mastery of kinematics using multiple-choice formats, while others combine the true-false and multiple-choice formats. Almost all instruments of mastery of the concept of widely used kinematics have reported validity assessment (content validity, construct validity) and internal consistency reliability. However, predictive validity, discriminatory validity, and temporal stability reliability have not been reported. Other results indicate that the development of further assessments must pay attention to five important aspects: the validity and reliability of instruments, the scopes and specificity of the concept of kinematics, the conformity with the intellectual level of students, the effectiveness and efficiency of instrument assessment, and the fulfillment of research gaps. This study can help educators and researchers choose and develop an appropriate instrument assessment to reveal students’ understanding of the concept of kinematics.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 97 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Malang
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hena Dian AyuAffiliation unknown2
Sri Rahayu LestariAffiliation unknown2
Dewi Sekar MiasihAffiliation unknown2
Tsania Nur DiyanaState University of Malang2
Indah RahmawatiState University of Malang1
Siti ZulaikahState University of Malang1
Anisa Matinu SaifullahState University of Malang1
Hari WisodoState University of Malang1
Munzil MunzilState University of Malang1
F. X. BerekAffiliation unknown1
Edy KurniantoAffiliation unknown1
Dela Ayu LestariAffiliation unknown1
Asep SetiajiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Iqbal SamanAffiliation unknown1
Supriyono Koes-HAffiliation unknown1
Nuril MunfaridahAffiliation unknown1
Putri Risky HarditaAffiliation unknown1
Oliviana Monik BoiAffiliation unknown1
Nurul AinAffiliation unknown1
Hestiningtyas Yuli PratiwiAffiliation unknown1
Paskalina JayaAffiliation unknown1
Fathiah AlatasAffiliation unknown1
Tutut KumalasariAffiliation unknown1
Astrini Dewi KusumawatiAffiliation unknown1
Agus BudiyonoAffiliation unknown1
Hendra SusantoNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University1
Rony IrawantoNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Muhammad Sasmito DjatiAffiliation unknown1
Hidajah RachmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Alif Rosyidah El BarorohAffiliation unknown1
Yuslinda AnnisaAffiliation unknown1
Adrianto AdriantoAffiliation unknown1
Zuher SyihabAffiliation unknown1
Taufan MarhaendrajanaAffiliation unknown1
Suntoro SuntoroAffiliation unknown1
Slamet MinardiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/oai, first harvested 8 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Assessment of kinematic concepts comprehension: A systematic review</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Jufriadi, Akhmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sutopo, Sutopo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kusairi, Sentot</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sunaryono, Sunaryono</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Instrument assessment; Kinematics comprehension; Kinematics concept; Next assessment; Student’s understanding</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">A systematic study on the development of the assessment instrument of the concept of kinematics which is one of the basic concepts of physics has not yet been conducted. This systematic study reported the characteristics, quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the instrument assessment regarding the concept of kinematics. This systematic review method has used a systematic approach based on the practical guidelines of systematic reviews by Petticrew and Roberts and has used PRISMA diagrams for the process of searching and selecting articles, who reviewed 12 articles published between 1985 and 2021. The research findings show that the instrument of concept mastery of kinematics using multiple-choice formats, while others combine the true-false and multiple-choice formats. Almost all instruments of mastery of the concept of widely used kinematics have reported validity assessment (content validity, construct validity) and internal consistency reliability. However, predictive validity, discriminatory validity, and temporal stability reliability have not been reported. Other results indicate that the development of further assessments must pay attention to five important aspects: the validity and reliability of instruments, the scopes and specificity of the concept of kinematics, the conformity with the intellectual level of students, the effectiveness and efficiency of instrument assessment, and the fulfillment of research gaps. This study can help educators and researchers choose and develop an appropriate instrument assessment to reveal students’ understanding of the concept of kinematics.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2023-09-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/24546</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24546</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE); Vol 12, No 3: September 2023; 1449-1459</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-5440</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8822</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijere.v12i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/24546/13645</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>