Open access
Journal
SINTA 1
The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission)
Konsep dan Perlindungan Hukum atas Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan Berupa Tidak Melakukan Perbuatan Konkret (Omission)
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
ISSN 2477-815X, 2303-3827
Published 2025-12-24
Publisher Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram
Language eng
Abstract
After the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (Government Administration Law or abbreviated as UU AP in Indonesian) and Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 of 2019, the authority of the Administrative Judiciary has expanded. The Administrative Judiciary adjudicates disputes related to administrative decisions and handles disputes related to government administrative actions (Factual Conduct). Actions that can be sued include active (performing concrete/Factual Conduct - commission) and passive (not performing concrete/Factual Conduct-omission) actions. Although Government Administration Law and Supreme Court Regulation do not provide detailed explanations regarding the meaning and criteria of passive government actions, based on studies, several criteria can be used to assess whether passive government actions can be considered unlawful. These criteria include the existence of a legal obligation that must be performed by an administrative official. The action is within the scope of their authority, the official intentionally does not fulfill the obligation, the action violates legislation and legal obligations, or the plaintiff’s subjective rights, and the existence of a permissible claim for actual damages. In terms of legal protection, citizens can file a lawsuit in the Administrative Court against the failure of a government body or official to perform a concrete action. However, in practice, various problems still arise, such as the time limit for filing lawsuits, the obligation to pursue administrative remedies first, and issues related to the tacit authorization concept.
Collaboration network of the authors
8 authors ·
14 co-authorship links
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/oai, first harvested 9 Nov 2026, last seen 9 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission)</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="id-ID">Konsep dan Perlindungan Hukum atas Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan Berupa Tidak Melakukan Perbuatan Konkret (Omission)</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Asimah, Dewi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Erliyana, Anna</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Concrete Actions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Government Administrative Actions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Factual Conduct</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Passive Actions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Perbuatan Konkret</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Tindakan Faktual</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Tindakan Pasif</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Perlindungan Hukum</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">After the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (Government Administration Law or abbreviated as UU AP in Indonesian) and Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 of 2019, the authority of the Administrative Judiciary has expanded. The Administrative Judiciary adjudicates disputes related to administrative decisions and handles disputes related to government administrative actions (Factual Conduct). Actions that can be sued include active (performing concrete/Factual Conduct - commission) and passive (not performing concrete/Factual Conduct-omission) actions. Although Government Administration Law and Supreme Court Regulation do not provide detailed explanations regarding the meaning and criteria of passive government actions, based on studies, several criteria can be used to assess whether passive government actions can be considered unlawful. These criteria include the existence of a legal obligation that must be performed by an administrative official. The action is within the scope of their authority, the official intentionally does not fulfill the obligation, the action violates legislation and legal obligations, or the plaintiff’s subjective rights, and the existence of a permissible claim for actual damages. In terms of legal protection, citizens can file a lawsuit in the Administrative Court against the failure of a government body or official to perform a concrete action. However, in practice, various problems still arise, such as the time limit for filing lawsuits, the obligation to pursue administrative remedies first, and issues related to the tacit authorization concept.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2025-12-24</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-Reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1520</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.29303/ius.v13i3.1520</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; 708-733</dc:source>
<dc:source>2477-815X</dc:source>
<dc:source>2303-3827</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.29303/ius.v13i3</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1520/689</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Dewi Asimah, Anna Erliyana</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Not checked
Crossref
Not checked
Cite this article
APA 7
Asimah, D., & Erliyana, A. (2025). The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission). Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan), 13(3), 708–733. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i3.1520
Copy
IEEE
D. Asimah and A. Erliyana, “The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission),” Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 708–733, 2025, doi: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1520.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.