Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Analysis of The Effectiveness of KCL Polymer on Reactive Clay Formation in The 26 Section of A Field FA1

Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas · Vol. 49 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 237–247

DOI
10.29017/scog.v49i1.2015
ISSN
2541-0520, 2089-3361
Published
2026-02-27
Publisher
Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

In geothermal well drilling, a primary challenge is clay swelling, particularly in reactive clay formations, where drilling success is largely determined by the type of drilling fluid used. Although gel polymer mud is commonly preferred, adding KCl polymer is often necessary to mitigate swelling in such formations. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of KCl-polymer mud in mitigating clay reactivity in the 26-inch borehole section of the FA1 well in a geothermal field. The methodology began with the methylene blue test to assess clay reactivity, followed by the formulation of gel polymer and various concentrations of KCl polymer muds. A linear swell meter test was subsequently conducted to compare the swelling reduction performance of each mud type. The methylene blue test results indicated a smectite content of 60 meq/100 g, confirming the presence of reactive clay in the 26-inch borehole. LSM test results showed that the Gel Polymer mud exhibited 25.78% swelling over 11 hours, indicating it was ineffective for such formations.In contrast, the 7% KCl Polymer mud significantly reduced swelling to 16.38% over 8 hours. This improvement is attributed to the substitution of Na⁺ ions with K⁺ ions, which neutralizes negative charges on clay surfaces and reduces the clay's water-holding capacity. The findings confirm that KCl Polymer mud is more effective in minimizing clay swelling in reactive geothermal formations.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 157 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Trisakti
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Asri NugrahantiAffiliation unknown4
Ghanima YasmianiarAffiliation unknown3
Venezia Chelsea Reggiana KalaloAffiliation unknown3
R Hari Karyadi OetomoAffiliation unknown3
Andry PrimaAffiliation unknown2
Anif Mukaromah WatiAffiliation unknown1
Hanum MuarifahAffiliation unknown1
Chanifan Ibadi Fajar HerlambangAffiliation unknown1
Heaven Nila Nanda PratamaAffiliation unknown1
Anie Eka KusumastutiAffiliation unknown1
Syauqi Rahman HudaniAffiliation unknown1
Husni MubarrakAffiliation unknown1
Muslem MuslemAffiliation unknown1
Pauhesti PauhestiAffiliation unknown1
Sri Feni MaulindaniAffiliation unknown1
Apriandi Rizkina Rangga WastuAffiliation unknown1
Nadira Cahya SutiknaAffiliation unknown1
Lailatul WastiyahAffiliation unknown1
Ade Kurniawan SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Rini SetiatiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Taufiq FathaddinAffiliation unknown1
Widia YantiAffiliation unknown1
SamsolAffiliation unknown1
Lilian AnggelaAffiliation unknown1
Nandito DavyAffiliation unknown1
Mustamina MaulaniUniversitas Trisakti1
Cahaya RosyidanAffiliation unknown1
Lisa SamuraAffiliation unknown1
Maman DjumantaraAffiliation unknown1
Dina Asmaul ChusniyahAffiliation unknown1
Aqlyna FattahanisaAffiliation unknown1
Bayu SatiyawiraAffiliation unknown1
BrillianiAffiliation unknown1
Asep Kurnia PermadiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/oai, first harvested 10 Nov 2026, last seen 10 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Analysis of The Effectiveness of KCL Polymer on Reactive Clay Formation in The 26 Section of A Field FA1</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wastu, Apriandi Rizkina Rangga</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Husla, Ridha</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ridaliani, Onnie</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Suci, Farah Adiana Eka</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Soekardy, Mentari Gracia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Azizah, Siti</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">KCl polimer</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">gel polymer</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">swelling clay</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">reactive clay</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">linear swelling clay</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In geothermal well drilling, a primary challenge is clay swelling, particularly in reactive clay formations, where drilling success is largely determined by the type of drilling fluid used. Although gel polymer mud is commonly preferred, adding KCl polymer is often necessary to mitigate swelling in such formations. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of KCl-polymer mud in mitigating clay reactivity in the 26-inch borehole section of the FA1 well in a geothermal field. The methodology began with the methylene blue test to assess clay reactivity, followed by the formulation of gel polymer and various concentrations of KCl polymer muds. A linear swell meter test was subsequently conducted to compare the swelling reduction performance of each mud type. The methylene blue test results indicated a smectite content of 60 meq/100 g, confirming the presence of reactive clay in the 26-inch borehole. LSM test results showed that the Gel Polymer mud exhibited 25.78% swelling over 11 hours, indicating it was ineffective for such formations.In contrast, the 7% KCl Polymer mud significantly reduced swelling to 16.38% over 8 hours. This improvement is attributed to the substitution of Na⁺ ions with K⁺ ions, which neutralizes negative charges on clay surfaces and reduces the clay's water-holding capacity. The findings confirm that KCl Polymer mud is more effective in minimizing clay swelling in reactive geothermal formations.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-02-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/2015</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29017/scog.v49i1.2015</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol. 49 No. 1 (2026); 237-247</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol 49 No 1 (2026); 237-247</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-0520</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-3361</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/2015/1650</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 © Copyright by Authors. Published by LEMIGAS</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>