Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Questioning the Promise of Dialogic Feedback: Engagement Challenges Across Proficiency Levels in EFL Writing

Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 437–463

DOI
10.24903/sj.v11i2.2477
ISSN
2502-6623, 2477-1880
Published
2026-08-19
Publisher
Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda University
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Background: Although dialogic feedback has received increasing attention in EFL writing research, little is known about whether students with different proficiency levels experience similar engagement challenges during dialogic feedback. This study aims to explore the engagement challenges experienced by low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency EFL students. Methodology: This study employed a qualitative multiple-case study design involving six undergraduate EFL students at an Indonesian public university. Participants were purposively selected based on their proficiency levels from an in-house essay diagnostic test assessed using the IELTS Writing Task 2 band scale (1–9). Students scoring below Band 3 were classified as A1 (low proficiency), while those scoring Band 4–5 were classified as B1 (intermediate proficiency). Three students from each group were selected to form two contrasting cases. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically using within-case and cross-case comparisons. Findings: The findings revealed both shared and proficiency-specific engagement challenges among the six participants. Both low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency students experienced unclear feedback, revisions limited to lecturer corrections, and low self-confidence. However, low-proficiency students also faced dependence on lecturer authority, difficulty transferring feedback to future writing tasks, limited clarification-seeking, inadequate preparation, and greater fear and anxiety during feedback interactions. In contrast, intermediate-proficiency students mainly experienced inconsistent clarification-seeking, anxiety related to extensive revisions, and sensitivity to lecturers’ attitudes and appreciation. Conclusion: The findings suggest that engagement challenges during dialogic feedback vary across proficiency levels. Common challenges were evident in both groups, whereas proficiency-specific challenges reflected differences in students’ experiences and support needs. Therefore, dialogic feedback should be adapted to accommodate these differences in order to promote more effective student engagement. Originality: This study contributes to the dialogic feedback literature by providing insights into engagement challenges during dialogic feedback interactions among low- and intermediate-proficiency EFL students in an Indonesian higher education context. It extends previous proficiency-based research by highlighting how students at different proficiency levels experience and navigate challenges in dialogic feedback.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 79 co-authorship links · 8 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Makassar
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene
  • University of Bengkulu
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sakaria SakariaHasanuddin University2
Fauzan Hari Sudding SallyAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad BasriAffiliation unknown2
Fitriyanti Jumaetri SamiAffiliation unknown1
N NursamsiarAffiliation unknown1
Dayan El-Roy MatitawaerAffiliation unknown1
L LukmanAffiliation unknown1
Yusnita RifaiAffiliation unknown1
Nurmahida PagamaAffiliation unknown1
Lisa ChristineAffiliation unknown1
Nursamsiar NursamsiarAffiliation unknown1
Besse HardiantiAffiliation unknown1
Ariny Aggreni MulyaniAffiliation unknown1
Budiman YasirAffiliation unknown1
Subehan Ambo LalloAffiliation unknown1
Sukardi WedaState University of Makassar1
Andi Elsa Fadhilah SaktiHasanuddin University1
Abdullah AbdullahState University of Makassar1
Nurlinda NurlindaState University of Makassar1
Mega SyafitriState University of Makassar1
Munir MunirState University of Makassar1
Sugurawati AbubakarState University of Makassar1
Baso JabuState University of Makassar1
Anwar SewangAffiliation unknown1
Marzul HidayatAffiliation unknown1
Fortunasari FortunasariAffiliation unknown1
Dairabi KamilAffiliation unknown1
Nur WakhidahAffiliation unknown1
Mujamil QomarAffiliation unknown1
Muh. Arief BudimanAffiliation unknown1
Abdul MajidAffiliation unknown1
Safnil ArsyadUniversity of Bengkulu1
Syarifuddin DollahState University of Makassar1
Jamaluddin AhmadAffiliation unknown1
Maemuna MuhayyangAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/Script/oai, first harvested 10 Nov 2026, last seen 10 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Questioning the Promise of Dialogic Feedback: Engagement Challenges Across Proficiency Levels in EFL Writing</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurchalis, Nur Fadillah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Noni, Nurdin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sakkir, Geminastiti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ariyani, Amra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Aswad, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Challenges</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Dialogic Feedback</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">EFL Writing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Proficiency</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Students’ Engagement</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Background: 
Although dialogic feedback has received increasing attention in EFL writing research, little is known about whether students with different proficiency levels experience similar engagement challenges during dialogic feedback. This study aims to explore the engagement challenges experienced by low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency EFL students.
Methodology: 
This study employed a qualitative multiple-case study design involving six undergraduate EFL students at an Indonesian public university. Participants were purposively selected based on their proficiency levels from an in-house essay diagnostic test assessed using the IELTS Writing Task 2 band scale (1–9). Students scoring below Band 3 were classified as A1 (low proficiency), while those scoring Band 4–5 were classified as B1 (intermediate proficiency). Three students from each group were selected to form two contrasting cases. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically using within-case and cross-case comparisons.
Findings: 
The findings revealed both shared and proficiency-specific engagement challenges among the six participants. Both low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency students experienced unclear feedback, revisions limited to lecturer corrections, and low self-confidence. However, low-proficiency students also faced dependence on lecturer authority, difficulty transferring feedback to future writing tasks, limited clarification-seeking, inadequate preparation, and greater fear and anxiety during feedback interactions. In contrast, intermediate-proficiency students mainly experienced inconsistent clarification-seeking, anxiety related to extensive revisions, and sensitivity to lecturers’ attitudes and appreciation.
Conclusion: 
The findings suggest that engagement challenges during dialogic feedback vary across proficiency levels. Common challenges were evident in both groups, whereas proficiency-specific challenges reflected differences in students’ experiences and support needs. Therefore, dialogic feedback should be adapted to accommodate these differences in order to promote more effective student engagement.
Originality: 
This study contributes to the dialogic feedback literature by providing insights into engagement challenges during dialogic feedback interactions among low- and intermediate-proficiency EFL students in an Indonesian higher education context. It extends previous proficiency-based research by highlighting how students at different proficiency levels experience and navigate challenges in dialogic feedback.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/Script/article/view/2477</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24903/sj.v11i2.2477</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): August ; 437-463</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-6623</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-1880</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24903/sj.v11i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/Script/article/view/2477/1224</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Fadillah Nurchalis, Nurdin Noni, Geminastiti Sakkir, Amra Ariyani, Muhammad Aswad</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>