Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal SINTA 1

Chronic Disease of State Corporatism in Indonesian Village Government

Sriwijaya Law Review · Vol. ume (2022) · pp. 304–318

DOI
10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.403.pp304-318
ISSN
2541-6464, 2541-5298
Published
2022-07-30
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
Language
eng

Abstract

The institutional regulation of the Indonesian village government from the Dutch colonial era (1906) until the Reform Era has practically shown controversy of pros and cons. Through correct regulation, the village should be able to prosper. However, the applied regulation as a tool of social engineering during the inter-period has failed to bring the village to prosper. The legal gaps are whether the applied state-corporatism norms on Indonesia village regulation have met the principles of good local governance. This study aims to provide corrections to the heresy of legal construction of the village regulations. This legal method of study was a nomological type with a statute approach. The technical analysis used was content analysis. The results showed that the legality of the village government status, which is state-corporatism containing in norms of the provision of Number 1, Number 2, Number 7, Article 6 paragraph (1), Article 6 paragraph (1) of the Law 6/2014 is not synchronous vertically to the 1945 Constitution. The results of the legitimacy study also revealed that Articles 12, 19, 19 (b)(c)(d), 69 of Law 6/2014 concerning the Authority and Changes of the Status of Urban Villages (Gesellschaft) into Common-Village (gemeinschaft) implies horizontal disharmony to the Law 30/2014 concerning Government Administration. Therefore Law 6/2014 needs to be revoked and replaced with an organic law derived from Articles 18, 18A and 18B of the 1945 Indonesia Constitution.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

38 authors · 94 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sudarsono SudarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Rina Elsa RizkianaAffiliation unknown2
Prija DjatmikaAffiliation unknown2
Samsudi SamsudiAffiliation unknown1
Cahyo Budi UtomoAffiliation unknown1
Dedik BudiantaAffiliation unknown1
Wiwik HardaningsihAffiliation unknown1
As'ad SyaziliAffiliation unknown1
AisyahAffiliation unknown1
Hanif HardiantoAffiliation unknown1
Hanif NurcholisAffiliation unknown1
Salawati Mat BasirAffiliation unknown1
Ramalinggam RajamanickamAffiliation unknown1
Wahbi RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Airin LiemantoAffiliation unknown1
Nur ChanifahAffiliation unknown1
Fines FatimahAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Iman SantosoUniversity of Duisburg-Essen1
Meilani MeilaniInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Yus Rama DennyAffiliation unknown1
Sulaeman Deni RamdaniAffiliation unknown1
Rafa JafarAffiliation unknown1
Setyo WidagdoAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad Fattah RiphatAffiliation unknown1
Alief RisyawanAffiliation unknown1
Slamet WahyudiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad BayanullahAffiliation unknown1
Moh. KhusainiAffiliation unknown1
Mariyam JameelahAffiliation unknown1
Tuti NurainiAffiliation unknown1
Dewi IrawatyAffiliation unknown1
Purwaningdyah Murti WahyuniAffiliation unknown1
Henny YuningsihAffiliation unknown1
Ni Made Jaya SenastriAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/oai, first harvested 10 Nov 2026, last seen 10 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Chronic Disease of State Corporatism in Indonesian Village Government</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kridasakti, Sri Wahyu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fadli, Mohamad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Madjid, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nurcholis, Chanif</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Indonesian Village Government</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Legitima-cy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">State Corporatism</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">the 1945 Constitution.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The institutional regulation of the Indonesian village government from the Dutch colonial era (1906) until the Reform Era has practically shown controversy of pros and cons. Through correct regulation, the village should be able to prosper. However, the applied regulation as a tool of social engineering during the inter-period has failed to bring the village to prosper. The legal gaps are whether the applied state-corporatism norms on Indonesia village regulation have met the principles of good local governance. This study aims to provide corrections to the heresy of legal construction of the village regulations. This legal method of study was a nomological type with a statute approach. The technical analysis used was content analysis. The results showed that the legality of the village government status, which is state-corporatism containing in norms of the provision of Number 1, Number 2, Number 7, Article 6 paragraph (1), Article 6 paragraph (1) of the Law 6/2014 is not synchronous vertically to the 1945 Constitution. The results of the legitimacy study also revealed that Articles 12, 19, 19 (b)(c)(d), 69 of Law 6/2014 concerning the Authority and Changes of the Status of Urban Villages (Gesellschaft) into Common-Village (gemeinschaft) implies horizontal disharmony to the Law 30/2014 concerning Government Administration. Therefore Law 6/2014 needs to be revoked and replaced with an organic law derived from Articles 18, 18A and 18B of the 1945 Indonesia Constitution.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-07-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/403</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.403.pp304-318</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Sriwijaya Law Review; Volume 6 Issue 2, July 2022; 304-318</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-6464</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-5298</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/403/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/403/912</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Sriwijaya Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>