Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal SINTA 1

Evaluation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculum on Production and Nutrient Content of Pennisetum purpureum

Tropical Animal Science Journal · Vol. 41 No. 2 (2018) · pp. 114–120

DOI
10.5398/tasj.2018.41.2.114
ISSN
2615-790X, 2615-787X
Published
2018-07-31
Publisher
Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University
Language
eng

Abstract

Land for forage planting is mainly on marginal land such as acid soil. However, the constraint is the low levels of phosphorus (P) that can inhibit forage production. Arbuscula mycorrhizal fungi has been known as a biological fertilizer because the fungi can help the absorption of phosphorus (P) on the root so that can improve the forage production and quality of nutrients. This study was aimed to utilize and evaluate the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum in forage production and nutritive value of Pennisetum purpureum. The experiment used a completely randomized design with two factors (2 x 4) and 4 replications. The first factor was type of AMF inoculum (A and B) and the second factor was doses of AMF (D1= 0.5 kg/planting hole, D2= 1 kg/planting hole, D3= 1.5 kg/planting hole, and D4= 2 kg/planting hole). Control treatment was carried out separately. The result showed that the highest shoot dry weight production was on AD2 and significantly different (P<0.05) from BD1 and control. There was no interaction between type and dose of inoculum on shoot dry weight production and nutrition value. The inoculum A significantly increased (P<0.05) shoot dry weight production (34.04%), crude protein content (10.21%), phosphorus uptake (40%), N content (10.53%), N uptake (38.10%), and protein production (40.15%) of P. purpureum, compared to inoculum B. It can be concluded that AMF inoculum type A was the best inoculum for forage production.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

33 authors · 103 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
L. AbdullahUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka8
A. ErnawatiAffiliation unknown2
D. WirnasAffiliation unknown2
B. PutraAffiliation unknown2
R. A. GoparAffiliation unknown2
N HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Iwan HerdiawanAffiliation unknown1
D SopandieAffiliation unknown1
I. AnasAffiliation unknown1
P. S. HutapeaAffiliation unknown1
K. G. WiryawanAffiliation unknown1
I.W.T. WibawanAffiliation unknown1
M. SobriAffiliation unknown1
Y. WidiawatiAffiliation unknown1
D EvvyernieAffiliation unknown1
H. HarminiAffiliation unknown1
Supriyanto .Affiliation unknown1
D.A. AstutiAffiliation unknown1
R. SriagtulaAffiliation unknown1
ZurmiatiAffiliation unknown1
I. G. PermanaAffiliation unknown1
M. RidlaAffiliation unknown1
F. A. RatnaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
N. R. KumalasariAffiliation unknown1
D. DiapariAffiliation unknown1
S. HumanAffiliation unknown1
T. RostiniAffiliation unknown1
A. KuswoyoAffiliation unknown1
E. E. MulyonoAffiliation unknown1
E. WawanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/oai, first harvested 10 Nov 2026, last seen 10 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculum on Production and Nutrient Content of Pennisetum purpureum</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Karti, P. D. M. H.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Prihantoro, I.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Setiana, M. A.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">latosolic soil</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pennisetum purpureum</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">forage production</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Land for forage planting is mainly on marginal land such as acid soil. However, the constraint is the low levels of phosphorus (P) that can inhibit forage production. Arbuscula mycorrhizal fungi has been known as a biological fertilizer because the fungi can help the absorption of phosphorus (P) on the root so that can improve the forage production and quality of nutrients. This study was aimed to utilize and evaluate the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum in forage production and nutritive value of Pennisetum purpureum. The experiment used a completely randomized design with two factors (2 x 4) and 4 replications. The first factor was type of AMF inoculum (A and B) and the second factor was doses of AMF (D1= 0.5 kg/planting hole, D2= 1 kg/planting hole, D3= 1.5 kg/planting hole, and D4= 2 kg/planting hole). Control treatment was carried out separately. The result showed that the highest shoot dry weight production was on AD2 and significantly different (P&amp;lt;0.05) from BD1 and control. There was no interaction between type and dose of inoculum on shoot dry weight production and nutrition value. The inoculum A significantly increased (P&amp;lt;0.05) shoot dry weight production (34.04%), crude protein content (10.21%), phosphorus uptake (40%), N content (10.53%), N uptake (38.10%), and protein production (40.15%) of P. purpureum, compared to inoculum B. It can be concluded that AMF inoculum type A was the best inoculum for forage production.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-07-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/22434</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.5398/tasj.2018.41.2.114</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Tropical Animal Science Journal; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2018): Tropical Animal Science Journal; 114-120</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-790X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-787X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/22434/14893</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2018 Tropical Animal Science Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>