Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal SINTA 1

Authorities of Preparation and Hospitality of Applications for Post-Conditions Post-Decision of Constitutional Court

Yuridika · Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019) · pp. 75–92

DOI
10.20473/ydk.v35i1.7551
ISSN
2528-3103, 0215-840X
Published
2019-10-21
Publisher
Universitas Airlangga
Language
eng

Abstract

The objective of Pre-Trial is basically to provide justice rights protection from abuse of power and the arbitrary actions of law enforcement officers. Pre-Trial is as the guard for the realization of due process of law. Hence, its authority is not limited to Article 77 of the Criminal Law Procedural Code and the decision of Constitutional Court No.21/PUU-XII/2014. The dismissal of Pre-Trial appeal as provided for in article 82 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph d of the Criminal Law Procedural Code and the decision of the Constitutional Court No.102/PUU-XII/2015 do not have a sufficient rational basis. Pre-Trial and principal case examination should not terminate each other. Conversely, the result of Pre-Trial will be used as a reference to analyze whether evidence used in the principal case examination is conducted properly or not. Thus, when a Pre-Trial examination is underway, the chief of a judge of the district court must adjourn the principal review of his case.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

16 authors · 56 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
MaradonaAffiliation unknown2
Eny SuastutiAffiliation unknown1
Akhmad Farid Mawardi SufyanAffiliation unknown1
Gatoet PoernomoAffiliation unknown1
Siswanto SiswantoHasanuddin University1
Ahmad MunirAffiliation unknown1
Rr. Herini Siti AisyahAffiliation unknown1
Sudarsono SudarsonoAffiliation unknown1
Heru IriantoAffiliation unknown1
Raissa Virgy RiandaAffiliation unknown1
Rama Azalix RiandaAffiliation unknown1
M. Hadi ShubhanAffiliation unknown1
Siswandi HendartaAffiliation unknown1
Dwiarso Budi SantiartoAffiliation unknown1
Ali FikriAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/oai, first harvested 10 Nov 2026, last seen 10 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Authorities of Preparation and Hospitality of Applications for Post-Conditions Post-Decision of Constitutional Court</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Minarno, Nur Basuki</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Pre-Trial</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Due Process of Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Constitutional Court.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The objective of Pre-Trial is basically to provide justice rights protection from abuse of power and the arbitrary actions of law enforcement officers. Pre-Trial is as the guard for the realization of due process of law. Hence, its authority is not limited to Article 77 of the Criminal Law Procedural Code and the decision of Constitutional Court No.21/PUU-XII/2014. The dismissal of Pre-Trial appeal as provided for in article 82 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph d of the Criminal Law Procedural Code and the decision of the Constitutional Court No.102/PUU-XII/2015 do not have a sufficient rational basis. Pre-Trial and principal case examination should not terminate each other. Conversely, the result of Pre-Trial will be used as a reference to analyze whether evidence used in the principal case examination is conducted properly or not. Thus, when a Pre-Trial examination is underway, the chief of a judge of the district court must adjourn the principal review of his case.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-10-21</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/7551</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/ydk.v35i1.7551</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): Volume 35 No 1 January 2020; 75-92</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-3103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-840X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/7551/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Yuridika</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>