Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Harmonization of Personal Data Protection Principles With Electronic Justice Systems In Indonesia

Yuridika · Vol. 40 No. 3 (2025) · pp. 343–368

DOI
10.20473/ydk.v40i3.74179
ISSN
2528-3103, 0215-840X
Published
2025-09-30
Publisher
Universitas Airlangga
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Modern digital-based justice is the answer to the challenges of the development of the times. Although modern justice reflects an adaptive judicial body, it must still be equipped with established regulations. This study aims to examine the harmonization of personal data protection principles between the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 concerning electronic case administration and trials and Law No. 27/2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). In this case, the researcher uses a normative juridical method, with a statutory regulatory and comparative combined approach. This study highlights the norms gap in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022, particularly in the aspect of protecting the personal data of the parties input into the electronic justice administration system. The main findings exhibited are that the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 does not regulate the basic principles of data protection as mandated by the PDP Law, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and privacy right violations. The fact that the principle of personal data protection in the Supreme Court regulation has not been absorbed is due to the PDP Law, which only came into effect in 2024, even though both were enacted in the same year in 2022. This is seen as weakening the legitimacy of electronic justice in Indonesia. This study is expected to provide a positive contribution in the form of regulatory reform through the revision of the Supreme Court regulations, the establishment of data protection units in the judicial environment, and strengthening institutional coordination. The results of the comparative analysis of common law systems such as England show the importance of integrating data protection principles into the legal infrastructure and institutions of electronic justice to be aware of the protection of privacy rights that intersect with the guarantee of the human rights of justice seekers.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

23 authors · 54 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sukarmi SukarmiAffiliation unknown4
Elisabeth Septin PuspoayuAffiliation unknown2
Setyo WidagdoAffiliation unknown2
Rika KurniatyAffiliation unknown2
Dhiana PuspitawatiAffiliation unknown1
Lukman Yudho PrakosoAffiliation unknown1
Nuddin HarahabAffiliation unknown1
Nurjannah NurjannahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Moh. FadliAffiliation unknown1
M. Rifqinizamy KarsayudaAffiliation unknown1
Indah Dwi QurbaniAffiliation unknown1
Syaifudin ZuchriAffiliation unknown1
Pan Moh. FaizAffiliation unknown1
Amelia Sri Kusuma DewiAffiliation unknown1
Theta MurtyAffiliation unknown1
Faizin SulistioAffiliation unknown1
Tata WijayantaAffiliation unknown1
Bambang SugiriAffiliation unknown1
YonatanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/oai, first harvested 10 Nov 2026, last seen 10 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Harmonization of Personal Data Protection Principles With Electronic Justice Systems In Indonesia </dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mardyansyah, Dody Novizar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sukarmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Adi Kusumaningrum</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yenny Eta Widyanti</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Regulatory reform</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Electronic justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Personal data protection</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Perma 7/2022</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">PDP Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Modern digital-based justice is the answer to the challenges of the development of the times. Although modern justice reflects an adaptive judicial body, it must still be equipped with established regulations. This study aims to examine the harmonization of personal data protection principles between the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 concerning electronic case administration and trials and Law No. 27/2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). In this case, the researcher uses a normative juridical method, with a statutory regulatory and comparative combined approach. This study highlights the norms gap in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022, particularly in the aspect of protecting the personal data of the parties input into the electronic justice administration system. The main findings exhibited are that the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 does not regulate the basic principles of data protection as mandated by the PDP Law, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and privacy right violations. The fact that the principle of personal data protection in the Supreme Court regulation has not been absorbed is due to the PDP Law, which only came into effect in 2024, even though both were enacted in the same year in 2022. This is seen as weakening the legitimacy of electronic justice in Indonesia. This study is expected to provide a positive contribution in the form of regulatory reform through the revision of the Supreme Court regulations, the establishment of data protection units in the judicial environment, and strengthening institutional coordination. The results of the comparative analysis of common law systems such as England show the importance of integrating data protection principles into the legal infrastructure and institutions of electronic justice to be aware of the protection of privacy rights that intersect with the guarantee of the human rights of justice seekers.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/74179</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/ydk.v40i3.74179</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol. 40 No. 3 (2025): Volume 40 No 3 September 2025; 343-368</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-3103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-840X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/74179/34375</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/74179/35056</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Dody Novizar Mardyansyah, Sukarmi, Yenny Eta Widyanti</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>