Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Students’ Synthesis Problems in Writing Their Literature Reviews at The English Education Department of Halu Oleo University

Journal of Teaching of English · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021) · pp. 121–127

ISSN
2548-6810
Published
2021-07-04
Publisher
Universitas Halu Oleo
Language
eng

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) students‘ synthesis problems in writing their literature reviews at the English Education Department of Halu Oleo University; (2) factors that affect students‘ synthesis problems; (3) solutions to overcome those problems. This research used qualitative research design and employed content analysis method, since the undergraduated students‘ theses were qualitatively analyzed to find out their synthesis problems in writing their literature reviews. The researcher used 6 of the undergraduated students‘ theses, which each both of them came from different research areas, such as teaching, linguistic and literature, and the interview result as the data sources. The instruments of this research were a rubric and an interview guideline. In collecting and analyzing the data, the researcher used a rubric that consisted of 1 to 4 range score and 3 measuring criterias, such as source variety, language focus, and organization, to measure students‘ level of synthesis and to know in which criteria did students mostly had problem with in synthesizing literature reviews of their theses, and also interview guideline to explore respondents‘ perspectives on synthesis information. The results of this research revealed that:(1) 5 out of 6 theses got low level of synthesis, whereas, 1 thesis got moderate level of synthesis, and all of those theses got the same problem in source variety criteria; (2) there were several factors that hindered students‘ ability to write a literature review, especially in synthesizing information; (3) therefore, the researcher offered solution related to how to write a good literature review. To conclude, it was clear that synthesis information should gain more attention in order to produce a good literature review in thesis writing.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 88 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Amir JayaUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Amirudin RahimAffiliation unknown2
Nurindah NurindahUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Hanna HannaUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Nurnia NurniaAffiliation unknown2
Aris BadaraUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Lisa IndrajayaAffiliation unknown1
Deddy AmrandAffiliation unknown1
La Ode Muhammad Nur RahimAffiliation unknown1
Amri TanduklangiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Sarwo Zulfahmi MDAffiliation unknown1
Nurfitriani ArifinAffiliation unknown1
Sahlan SahlanAffiliation unknown1
Zalili SailanUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Annisa RezkiAffiliation unknown1
Baso SulhamAffiliation unknown1
Rusnayanti RusnayantiAffiliation unknown1
Wisdar AristaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad JabirUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare1
Sitti AgustinaAffiliation unknown1
Nurhikmah Dwi AstutiAffiliation unknown1
Young Ervina OcktaviaAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad MusadiqAffiliation unknown1
Kamaluddin KamaluddinAffiliation unknown1
Endang Tri Novianty SamirinAffiliation unknown1
Siam SiamAffiliation unknown1
Muh. Khusnun MuhsinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Chici Faradillah HasanahAffiliation unknown1
Sisca Tiara HananditaAffiliation unknown1
Putu ArimbawaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Weka Gusmiarty AbdullahUniversitas Halu Oleo1
La Ode Santiaji BandeUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Indriyani NurUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muhammad ArbaAffiliation unknown1
Lelly SuhartiniUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Arwa ArwaAffiliation unknown1
Ria WulandariAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/oai, first harvested 31 Oct 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Students’ Synthesis Problems in Writing Their Literature Reviews at  The English Education Department of Halu Oleo University</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hartina, Rini Darianti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mursalim, Mursalim</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Muhsin, Muhammad Khusnun</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) students‘ synthesis problems in writing their literature reviews at the English Education Department of Halu Oleo University; (2) factors that affect students‘ synthesis problems; (3) solutions to overcome those problems. This research used qualitative research design and employed content analysis method, since the undergraduated students‘ theses were qualitatively analyzed to find out their synthesis problems in writing their literature reviews. The researcher used 6 of the undergraduated students‘ theses, which each both of them came from different research areas, such as teaching, linguistic and literature, and the interview result as the data sources. The instruments of this research were a rubric and an interview guideline. In collecting and analyzing the data, the researcher used a rubric that consisted of 1 to 4 range score and 3 measuring criterias, such as source variety, language focus, and organization, to measure students‘ level of synthesis and to know in which criteria did students mostly had problem with in synthesizing literature reviews of their theses, and also interview guideline to explore respondents‘ perspectives on synthesis information. The results of this research revealed that:(1) 5 out of 6 theses got low level of synthesis, whereas, 1 thesis got moderate level of synthesis, and all of those theses got the same problem in source variety criteria; (2) there were several factors that hindered students‘ ability to write a literature review, especially in synthesizing information; (3) therefore, the researcher offered solution related to how to write a good literature review. To conclude, it was clear that synthesis information should gain more attention in order to produce a good literature review in thesis writing.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Halu Oleo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2021-07-04</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/19272</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Teaching of English; Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Journal of Teaching of English; 121-127</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-6810</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/19272/12316</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Teaching of English</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>