Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

An Analysis of English Summative Test Used at Grade Eleven of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Bina Cendekia Tampo

Journal of Teaching of English · Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021) · pp. 258–266

ISSN
2548-6810
Published
2021-10-10
Publisher
Universitas Halu Oleo
Language
eng

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the quality of English summative test at grade eleven of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Bina Cendekia Tampo. The design of this research was descriptive quantitative research. In analyzing the data, the researcher used quantitative analysisusing the SPSS 25.0 program and Microsoft Excel to operate data in terms of item validity, the level of difficulty, discrimination power,item of distractors and reliability of the test. The result of the research shows that: (1) In term of validity, there are 12 items (30%) considered valid and 28 items (70%) are considered invalid; (2) In term of level of difficulty, there are 15 items of the test (37,5%) categorized as too difficult, 13 items of the test (32,5%) are categorized as moderate and 12 items (30%) are categorized as too easy; (3) In term of discrimination power, there are 3 items (7,5%) categorized as excellent, 10 items (25%) are categorized as good, 8 items (20%) are categorized as satisfactory, 17 items (42,5%) are categorized as poor and 2 items (5%) are categorized as very poor; (4) In term of item of distractor, there are 27 items (67,5%) categorized as effective and 13 items (32,5%) are categorized ineffective; (5) In term of reliability aspect, the test has high reliability with r11 of the test is 0,775; (6) Based on the overall analysis, there are 3 items of the test categorized as excellent, 10 items of the test are categorized as good, 9 items of the test are categorized assatisfactory, 13 items of the test are categorized as poor and 5 items of the test are categorized as very poor. In conclusion, most of the items in English summative of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Bina Cendekia Tampo do not fulfill the quality of a good test.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 83 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Aderlaepe AderlaepeUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Lelly SuhartiniUniversitas Halu Oleo4
La MilihaUniversitas Halu Oleo3
La Ode NggawuUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Siam SiamUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Tambunan TambunanAffiliation unknown2
Alimin AliminUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muh. Khusnun MuhsinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Anugrah Puspita Ayu MUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Madina MadinaAffiliation unknown1
Wahyudin MadilAffiliation unknown1
Alimin AliminAffiliation unknown1
Melly AstriyaniUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Tambunan TambunanUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Eca NurfarsilUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Akbar Ibnu ZenAffiliation unknown1
La Ode Muhammad Nur RahimAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode IsmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Siam SiamAffiliation unknown1
Nirmala NirmalaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Nur Ayuni Sari DewiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Melly AndaniUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Dwi Rezky SyamsuddinAffiliation unknown1
Demaulid DemaulidUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Firdaus SaleUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Iin IbrahimUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Wawan CahyadinAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Cici Malimua ShalihiAffiliation unknown1
Asrun LioAffiliation unknown1
Nirma Selastiana RasyidAffiliation unknown1
Wa EraAffiliation unknown1
Emisrawati EmisrawatiAffiliation unknown1
Amelia Amanda NusiAffiliation unknown1
La Ode NggawuAffiliation unknown1
Amir JayaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Purna PurnaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Irda Juni WardaningsihAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/oai, first harvested 31 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">An Analysis of English Summative Test Used at Grade Eleven of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Bina Cendekia Tampo</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Moneterisqi, Hiqma</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rohmana, Rohmana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fatmawati, Wa Ode</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research aims to investigate the quality of English summative test at grade eleven of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Bina Cendekia Tampo. The design of this research was descriptive quantitative research. In analyzing the data, the researcher used quantitative analysisusing the SPSS 25.0 program and Microsoft Excel to operate data in terms of item validity, the level of difficulty, discrimination power,item of distractors and reliability of the test. The result of the research shows that : (1) In term of validity, there are 12 items (30%) considered valid and 28 items (70%) are considered invalid; (2) In term of level of difficulty, there are 15 items of the test (37,5%) categorized as too difficult, 13 items of the test (32,5%) are categorized as moderate and 12 items (30%) are categorized as too easy; (3) In term of discrimination power, there are 3 items (7,5%) categorized as excellent, 10 items (25%) are categorized as good, 8 items (20%) are categorized as satisfactory, 17 items (42,5%) are categorized as poor and 2 items (5%) are categorized as very poor; (4) In term of item of distractor, there are 27 items (67,5%) categorized as effective and 13 items (32,5%) are categorized ineffective; (5) In term of reliability aspect, the test has high reliability with r11 of the test is 0,775; (6) Based on the overall analysis, there are 3 items of the test categorized as excellent, 10 items of the test are categorized as good, 9 items of the test are categorized assatisfactory, 13 items of the test are categorized as poor and 5 items of the test are categorized as very poor. In conclusion, most of the items in English summative of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Bina Cendekia Tampo do not fulfill the quality of a good test.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Halu Oleo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2021-10-10</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/21066</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Teaching of English; Vol 6, No 3 (2021): Journal of Teaching of English; 258-266</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-6810</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/21066/13046</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Teaching of English</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>