Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Identifying Starbucks Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction amid the Boycott Movement on Starbucks

Glocal Society Journal · Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) · pp. 74–83

DOI
10.31947/gs.v1i2.42849
ISSN
3063-5071
Published
2024-12-31
Publisher
Faculty of social and Political sciences, Hasanuddin University
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Starbucks a global coffee company and a giant in the coffee industry, has faced significant challenges impacting its business and trade activities worldwide due to being a target of boycott movements arising from the Israel-Palestine conflict. These boycotts, highly prevalent on social media, have led to a decline in Starbucks' profits globally, particularly in Indonesia. Despite the widespread boycott movements, some consumers continue to patronize Starbucks and choose it as their coffee destination. This study aims to explore how consumers perceive the Starbucks brand and identify the factors influencing their decision to continue choosing Starbucks amid the boycotts. The research employs a mixed-methods research (MMR) approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods, utilizing surveys, observations, in-depth interviews, and secondary data analysis such as documents and supporting information. The selection of respondents and informants was conducted purposefully based on specific criteria. The findings reveal that Starbucks Dprima's consumers are predominantly individuals seeking a comfortable space to complete academic or professional tasks. The factors driving their continued patronage include the comfort and satisfaction they experience, along with the appealing facilities and services provided by Starbucks. The consumers' views on the boycott are generally neutral or opposed, as they believe clearer and more comprehensive information is necessary before accepting boycott-related claims. Additionally, personal consumer perspectives on the boycott issue play a key role in their decision to continue visiting and choosing Starbucks Dprima.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

32 authors · 96 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • University of Auckland
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ahmad IsmailHasanuddin University3
Pawennari HijjangHasanuddin University2
Ahmad IsmailHasanuddin University1
Andi Muhammad YusufUniversitas Islam Negeri Mataram1
Rahmat YasimHasanuddin University1
Safriadi SafriadiAffiliation unknown1
Munsi LampeHasanuddin University1
Andi Rizka AuliahAffiliation unknown1
Andi Nurkintan RamadhaniAffiliation unknown1
Giani Rezkika AmeliaAffiliation unknown1
Riska AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
ShahfikaAffiliation unknown1
Septiara Rizky TrinandaAffiliation unknown1
Tiara Nur QathifahAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad IsmailHasanuddin University1
Muhammad Ilham Nur FurqanAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Aqsa RamadhanAffiliation unknown1
Putri Awaliyah NurAffiliation unknown1
Nurul KhalisahAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad BasirAffiliation unknown1
Hardiyanti MunsiAffiliation unknown1
Ansar ArifinAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad ArsatAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Yasir BasirHasanuddin University1
Ansar ArifinHasanuddin University1
Muhamad ArsatHasanuddin University1
Amril HansHasanuddin University1
Andi Batara Al IsraUniversity of Auckland1
Safriadi SafriadiHasanuddin University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/gs/oai, first harvested 2 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Identifying Starbucks Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction amid the Boycott Movement on Starbucks </dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">arissal, Laden</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ismail, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Munsi, Hardiyanti</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">starbucks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">consumers</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">boycott</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Satisfaction</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Starbucks a global coffee company and a giant in the coffee industry, has faced significant challenges impacting its business and trade activities worldwide due to being a target of boycott movements arising from the Israel-Palestine conflict. These boycotts, highly prevalent on social media, have led to a decline in Starbucks' profits globally, particularly in Indonesia. Despite the widespread boycott movements, some consumers continue to patronize Starbucks and choose it as their coffee destination. This study aims to explore how consumers perceive the Starbucks brand and identify the factors influencing their decision to continue choosing Starbucks amid the boycotts. The research employs a mixed-methods research (MMR) approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods, utilizing surveys, observations, in-depth interviews, and secondary data analysis such as documents and supporting information. The selection of respondents and informants was conducted purposefully based on specific criteria. The findings reveal that Starbucks Dprima's consumers are predominantly individuals seeking a comfortable space to complete academic or professional tasks. The factors driving their continued patronage include the comfort and satisfaction they experience, along with the appealing facilities and services provided by Starbucks. The consumers' views on the boycott are generally neutral or opposed, as they believe clearer and more comprehensive information is necessary before accepting boycott-related claims. Additionally, personal consumer perspectives on the boycott issue play a key role in their decision to continue visiting and choosing Starbucks Dprima.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of social and Political sciences, Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/gs/article/view/42849</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.31947/gs.v1i2.42849</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Glocal Society Journal; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024); 74 - 83</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3063-5071</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.31947/gs.v1i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/gs/article/view/42849/12611</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Glocal Society Journal</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>