Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HYBRID LSTM MODELS FOR MULTIVARIATE WATER QUALITY PREDICTION

Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi · Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026) · pp. 2739–2758

DOI
10.22437/jiituj.v10i5.56036
ISSN
2580-2259, 2580-2240
Published
2026-10-31
Publisher
LPPM Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Accurate multivariate water-quality forecasting is essential for environmental monitoring and early-warning systems. However, the comparative performance of different Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based architectures across water-quality parameters with different temporal characteristics remains insufficiently established. This study quantitatively compares five deep-learning architectures: standard LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), LSTM-GRU, CNN-LSTM, and Attention-based LSTM (AT-LSTM). The analysis uses 30,894 observations of seven water-quality parameters—chlorophyll, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, specific conductance, and turbidity—recorded at 30-minute intervals in the Brisbane River, Australia, from 4 August 2023 to 27 June 2024. We preprocessed the time-series data through missing-value imputation, Min–Max normalization, and sliding-window sequence construction. We divided the dataset into training and testing subsets using an 80:20 split, and trained the models using the Adam optimizer, mean squared error loss, and early stopping. We evaluated predictive performance using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). The results indicate that AT-LSTM achieved the best overall performance for six of the seven parameters, including temperature (R² = 0.998) and turbidity (R² = 0.636), while Bi-LSTM performed best for specific conductance (R² = 0.967). Chlorophyll and turbidity remained challenging because of their irregular fluctuations and extreme events. These findings demonstrate that model performance varies across water-quality parameters and that attention mechanisms can improve forecasting accuracy under the evaluated experimental conditions.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

13 authors · 34 co-authorship links · 7 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • STMIK Bina Patria
  • King Abdulaziz University
  • Universitas Trisakti
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Riza Ari RohmanAffiliation unknown2
Azmi AsraAffiliation unknown2
Donata Nariswari Wahyu WardaniAffiliation unknown2
Arif Rahman SalehAffiliation unknown2
Fatkhurrochman FatkhurrochmanAffiliation unknown2
Farida YunitaAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad FaridAffiliation unknown2
Wiwit SuryantoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/JIITUJ/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HYBRID LSTM MODELS FOR MULTIVARIATE WATER QUALITY PREDICTION</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Febriani, Yeza</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amukti, Rian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Apriniyadi, Mohammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Akhlak, Muhammad  Lutfi Mahasinul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wiratama, Satriya Yudha</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Attention Mechanism</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Deep Learning</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Long Short-Term Memory</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Water Quality Prediction</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Accurate multivariate water-quality forecasting is essential for environmental monitoring and early-warning systems. However, the comparative performance of different Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based architectures across water-quality parameters with different temporal characteristics remains insufficiently established. This study quantitatively compares five deep-learning architectures: standard LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), LSTM-GRU, CNN-LSTM, and Attention-based LSTM (AT-LSTM). The analysis uses 30,894 observations of seven water-quality parameters—chlorophyll, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, specific conductance, and turbidity—recorded at 30-minute intervals in the Brisbane River, Australia, from 4 August 2023 to 27 June 2024. We preprocessed the time-series data through missing-value imputation, Min–Max normalization, and sliding-window sequence construction. We divided the dataset into training and testing subsets using an 80:20 split, and trained the models using the Adam optimizer, mean squared error loss, and early stopping. We evaluated predictive performance using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). The results indicate that AT-LSTM achieved the best overall performance for six of the seven parameters, including temperature (R² = 0.998) and turbidity (R² = 0.636), while Bi-LSTM performed best for specific conductance (R² = 0.967). Chlorophyll and turbidity remained challenging because of their irregular fluctuations and extreme events. These findings demonstrate that model performance varies across water-quality parameters and that attention mechanisms can improve forecasting accuracy under the evaluated experimental conditions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">LPPM Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/56036</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/jiituj.v10i5.56036</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi; Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026): Volume 10, Nomor 5, October 2026; 2739-2758</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2259</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2240</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/jiituj.v10i5</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/56036/26002</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Yeza Febriani, Rian Amukti, Mohammad Apriniyadi, Muhammad  Lutfi Mahasinul Akhlak, Satriya Yudha Wiratama</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>