Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

The Comparison of Three Different Methods on Extraction of Cigarette Butt as Natural Insecticide

Jurnal Akta Kimia Indonesia (Indonesia Chimica Acta) · Vol. ume No. 2 (2020) · pp. 55–59

DOI
10.70561/ica.v13i2.11812
ISSN
2655-6049, 2085-014X
Published
2020-12-14
Publisher
Hasanuddin University
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Background: Cigarette butt could be used as an insecticide due to the present of alkaloid compounds in high yield, especially nicotine and eugenol. To maximize the extraction process of cigarette butt, the study related to the effect of extraction method to the effectivity of extraction process should be performed. Objective: The main purpose of this study was to identify the effect of extraction methods on the total yield and the nicotine and eugenol content of the extract of cigarette butt. Methods: In this study, maceration (CB-1), soxletation (CB-2), and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) (CB-3) methods were conducted and compared the yield and the nicotine and eugenol content of the extracts by LC-MS. Results: The results showed that the extract CB-3 has the highest yield (26,77%), which compared to CB-1 and CB-2, which are 11.72% and 14.56%, respectively. Furthermore, the nicotine content of all extracts are 54.15%, 36.43%, and 48.51% for extract CB-1, CB-2, and CB-3, respectively, while eugenol content of CB-1, CB-2, and CB-3 are 5.09%, 6.35%, and 8.41%, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be concluded that MAE method was more effective to extract the cigarette butt compared to maceration and soxletation method. This method was also reduced the time consuming and the volume of the solvent used in the extraction process which follow green chemistry rule. Thus, MAE method is potential to be used in extraction process of cigarette butt in order to produce a biopesticide.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 114 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • IPB University
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • State University of Gorontalo
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
nurjanah nurjanahAffiliation unknown5
NurjanahAffiliation unknown4
Novi LuthfiyanaUniversitas Borneo Tarakan4
Effionora AnwarAffiliation unknown4
Mala NurilmalaAffiliation unknown3
Irawati .Affiliation unknown2
Pipih SuptijahIPB University2
Ruddy SuwandiAffiliation unknown2
Dian AnggraeniAffiliation unknown2
Agoes Mardiono JacoebAffiliation unknown2
Dewita DewitaAffiliation unknown2
Desmelati DesmelatiAffiliation unknown2
Santhy Wisuda SidaurukAffiliation unknown2
Ita FitriatiSTKIP Taman Siswa Bima1
Septya Novena Elwana PutriAffiliation unknown1
Made Davendracana Andarawata MpuhajiAffiliation unknown1
I Made Agus Oka GunawanAffiliation unknown1
Gede IndrawanUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
Abdul Haris SunubiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare1
Ambo DalleAffiliation unknown1
Fitria Riany ErisAffiliation unknown1
Suparmi SuparmiSebelas Maret University1
Reinal PutalanState University of Gorontalo1
Pradeka Brilyan PurwandokoNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Christina LitaayAffiliation unknown1
Ashri IndriatiAffiliation unknown1
Fithria NoviantiAffiliation unknown1
Laela NurainiAffiliation unknown1
Nurhaidar RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Raden Cecep Erwan AndriansyahAffiliation unknown1
Nurhamidar RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Nor AsikinAffiliation unknown1
Mutia KhoirunnisaAffiliation unknown1
Melania SyahdaAffiliation unknown1
RamlanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/ica/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Comparison of Three Different Methods on Extraction of Cigarette Butt as Natural Insecticide</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Firdausiah, Syadza</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Firdaus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hamdayanty</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hidayat, Taufik</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Alfliadhi, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Background: Cigarette butt could be used as an insecticide due to the present of alkaloid compounds in high yield, especially nicotine and eugenol. To maximize the extraction process of cigarette butt, the study related to the effect of extraction method to the effectivity of extraction process should be performed.
Objective: The main purpose of this study was to identify the effect of extraction methods on the total yield and the nicotine and eugenol content of the extract of cigarette butt.
Methods: In this study, maceration (CB-1), soxletation (CB-2), and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) (CB-3) methods were conducted and compared the yield and the nicotine and eugenol content of the extracts by LC-MS.
Results: The results showed that the extract CB-3 has the highest yield (26,77%), which compared to CB-1 and CB-2, which are 11.72% and 14.56%, respectively. Furthermore, the nicotine content of all extracts are 54.15%, 36.43%, and 48.51% for extract CB-1, CB-2, and CB-3, respectively, while eugenol content of CB-1, CB-2, and CB-3 are 5.09%, 6.35%, and 8.41%, respectively.
Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be concluded that MAE method was more effective to extract the cigarette butt compared to maceration and soxletation method. This method was also reduced the time consuming and the volume of the solvent used in the extraction process which follow green chemistry rule. Thus, MAE method is potential to be used in extraction process of cigarette butt in order to produce a biopesticide.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-12-14</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/ica/article/view/11812</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.70561/ica.v13i2.11812</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Akta Kimia Indonesia (Indonesia Chimica Acta); Volume 13, No 2: December 2020; 55-59</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2655-6049</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2085-014X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/ica/article/view/11812/6148</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2020 Syadza Firdausiah, Firdaus, Hamdayanty, Taufik Hidayat, Muhammad Alfliadhi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>