Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Infusing Argumentation Activity on The Anticipation Guides Strategy to Improve The Reading Literacy: A Study on The Topic of Heat and Temperature

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia · Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 17–28

DOI
10.15294/jpfi.v22i1.38425
ISSN
2355-3812, 1693-1246
Published
2026-06-24
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Reading literacy is a basic ability to master conceptual understanding and high-order thinking skills. The latest PISA results show that Indonesians are at a low level of reading literacy achievement. This research was conducted to test the effectiveness of implementing the anticipation guides strategy, which is integrated with argumentation activities in improving students' reading literacy (literal, inferential, and critical indicators). A non-equivalent pre-test post-test control group was carried out. In the experimental class, the anticipation guide is implemented by inserting argumentation activities. The traditional reading strategy used in the control class was where students were asked to read the textbook directly. The findings show that reading literacy was increased significantly in the experimental class. Students who learned through Anticipation Guides integrated with argumentation activities demonstrated a greater improvement in reading literacy compared to those who experienced traditional reading activities. The integration of argumentation activities in Anticipation Guides proved to be effective in stimulating the activation of prior knowledge, strengthening inferential abilities, and fostering critical evaluation of reading texts. This research is useful in providing both practical and theoretical contributions in the development of science learning that trains students' reading literacy by inserting an argumentation activity on reading.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 138 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang9
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang8
Ian YuliantiAffiliation unknown7
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang6
Tri Joko RaharjoAffiliation unknown5
Anisa KalondengAffiliation unknown4
Sri Astuti ThamrinAffiliation unknown3
Listiyanto ListiyantoAffiliation unknown3
Pratiwi DwijanantiAffiliation unknown3
Imam SumponoAffiliation unknown3
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang3
Sarwi SarwiAffiliation unknown3
Alvian AlvianAffiliation unknown3
Susilo SusiloAffiliation unknown3
Sitti SahrimanAffiliation unknown2
Andi Isna YunitaAffiliation unknown2
Andi M Alfin BasoAffiliation unknown2
M. Zaky Hisyam GozhiAffiliation unknown2
Vika Yugi KurniawanAffiliation unknown2
Nurtiti SunusiAffiliation unknown2
Ade Safira SeptianyAffiliation unknown2
Raupong RaupongAffiliation unknown2
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang2
Fitri NurdianaAffiliation unknown2
Diah Nur FitriasariAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu PangestutiAffiliation unknown2
Harianingsih HarianingsihAffiliation unknown2
Fianti FiantiAffiliation unknown2
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang2
Nurul Heni AstutiAffiliation unknown2
Suharto LinuwihAffiliation unknown2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Supriyadi SupriyadiAffiliation unknown2
Bunaya Hanif WintribrataAffiliation unknown2
Fakhruddin FakhruddinAffiliation unknown2

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPFI/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Infusing Argumentation Activity on The Anticipation Guides Strategy to Improve The Reading Literacy: A Study on The Topic of Heat and Temperature</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Siswanto, Siswanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Dewantari, Nuryunita </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Subali, Bambang </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">R, Muhammad Daniel Fahmi </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Surya Gumilar</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">reading literacy, anticipation guides, argumentation activity, reading on science learning</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Reading literacy is a basic ability to master conceptual understanding and high-order thinking skills. The latest PISA results show that Indonesians are at a low level of reading literacy achievement. This research was conducted to test the effectiveness of implementing the anticipation guides strategy, which is integrated with argumentation activities in improving students' reading literacy (literal, inferential, and critical indicators). A non-equivalent pre-test post-test control group was carried out. In the experimental class, the anticipation guide is implemented by inserting argumentation activities. The traditional reading strategy used in the control class was where students were asked to read the textbook directly. The findings show that reading literacy was increased significantly in the experimental class. Students who learned through Anticipation Guides integrated with argumentation activities demonstrated a greater improvement in reading literacy compared to those who experienced traditional reading activities. The integration of argumentation activities in Anticipation Guides proved to be effective in stimulating the activation of prior knowledge, strengthening inferential abilities, and fostering critical evaluation of reading texts. This research is useful in providing both practical and theoretical contributions in the development of science learning that trains students' reading literacy by inserting an argumentation activity on reading.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPFI/article/view/38425</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpfi.v22i1.38425</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026); 17-28</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2355-3812</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1693-1246</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpfi.v22i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPFI/article/view/38425/10218</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>