Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Learner’s Perceptions on Vocabulary Learning Strategies: A Qualitative Single-Case Study

Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan · Vol. 42 No. 2 (2025) · pp. 115–123

DOI
10.15294/jpp.v42i2.28169
ISSN
2580-4154, 2503-1260
Published
2025-10-31
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This qualitative single-case study investigates an Indonesian EFL learner’s perceptions of vocabulary learning strategies, an important but often overlooked aspect of language learning. Despite vocabulary being the core of mastering a foreign language, learners' perceptions remain underexplored, particularly in qualitative research. This study aims to address that gap by examining a single participant’s use of and perceptions of vocabulary learning strategies. Data were collected through a 32-item Likert-scale questionnaire based on Schmitt’s (1997) taxonomy and semi-structured interviews guided by the Cognitive-Affective-Conative (CAC) perception model by Schiffman & Kanuk (2004). The findings revealed a contradictory perception: although the participant acknowledged the effectiveness and practicality of vocabulary learning strategies, she also expressed a belief that exposure to language is more critical than strategic vocabulary learning. The participant showed a clear preference for social strategies and incidental learning, which she found more enjoyable and versatile than memory strategies. Her cognitive, affective, and conative responses suggest that motivation in vocabulary learning are deeply influenced by strategy flexibility and learner autonomy. The study concludes that EFL learners should be introduced to various vocabulary learning strategies early in their education, and educators should design instruction that respects learners’ preferences. This research highlights the importance of the learner’s perspective as an input to the growing literature in the EFL learning context and recommends broader, multi-participant qualitative studies in the future.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 150 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Evi WidowatiAffiliation unknown5
Anik Setyo WahyuningsihState University of Semarang3
Lutfi MuzaqiAffiliation unknown2
Risa Anggita PutriAffiliation unknown2
Fitra Aulia RahmaAffiliation unknown2
Yuliati YuliatiAffiliation unknown2
Febryantika KustyandariAffiliation unknown1
Hanif Satria FebrianandaAffiliation unknown1
Magdalena Ayu Sri PramestiAffiliation unknown1
Dea Putri RahmadewiAffiliation unknown1
Naufal Arik MustofaAffiliation unknown1
Nasha ShafiraAffiliation unknown1
Shabrina MatildaAffiliation unknown1
Zuhriatul AiniAffiliation unknown1
Farid Akhbar FardillahAffiliation unknown1
Aulia FebriantiAffiliation unknown1
Luvi Lia NursucilowatiAffiliation unknown1
Elma Nurul AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Ardheta Heru MahartikoAffiliation unknown1
Berliana Noor TianisaAffiliation unknown1
M. Ditra RizallihadiAffiliation unknown1
Firda Aliya SabriyantiAffiliation unknown1
Delyanti Pare SandaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Fakrul NizamAffiliation unknown1
Almira Irwaniyanti UtamiAffiliation unknown1
Aditya Rangga Putra CahayaAffiliation unknown1
Nira AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Cahyo YuwonoAffiliation unknown1
Adi SAffiliation unknown1
Dicky Budhi SetyawanAffiliation unknown1
JumantoAffiliation unknown1
Sugianto Parulian SimanjuntakAffiliation unknown1
Erika AfrianaAffiliation unknown1
Karina Permata AndhiniAffiliation unknown1
Aza Putri AnisaAffiliation unknown1
Ayu Fadilah WahidAffiliation unknown1
Ratna Dewi KusumaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Ipung Totok AndriawanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPP/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Learner’s Perceptions on Vocabulary Learning Strategies: A Qualitative Single-Case Study</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amalia, Faridanisa Zulfa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sulistyani, Ummi Nur Laila</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">vocabulary learning strategies</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">learner perceptions</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">EFL</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">qualitative case study</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">language acquisition</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This qualitative single-case study investigates an Indonesian EFL learner’s perceptions of vocabulary learning strategies, an important but often overlooked aspect of language learning. Despite vocabulary being the core of mastering a foreign language, learners' perceptions remain underexplored, particularly in qualitative research. This study aims to address that gap by examining a single participant’s use of and perceptions of vocabulary learning strategies. Data were collected through a 32-item Likert-scale questionnaire based on Schmitt’s (1997) taxonomy and semi-structured interviews guided by the Cognitive-Affective-Conative (CAC) perception model by Schiffman &amp;amp; Kanuk (2004). The findings revealed a contradictory perception: although the participant acknowledged the effectiveness and practicality of vocabulary learning strategies, she also expressed a belief that exposure to language is more critical than strategic vocabulary learning. The participant showed a clear preference for social strategies and incidental learning, which she found more enjoyable and versatile than memory strategies. Her cognitive, affective, and conative responses suggest that motivation in vocabulary learning are deeply influenced by strategy flexibility and learner autonomy. The study concludes that EFL learners should be introduced to various vocabulary learning strategies early in their education, and educators should design instruction that respects learners’ preferences. This research highlights the importance of the learner’s perspective as an input to the growing literature in the EFL learning context and recommends broader, multi-participant qualitative studies in the future.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPP/article/view/28169</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpp.v42i2.28169</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan; Vol. 42 No. 2 (2025): October 2025; 115-123</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-4154</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1260</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpp.v42i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPP/article/view/28169/4557</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>