Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Effect of Implant Diameter on Biomechanical Response of Straight Multi-Unit Abutments in Mandibular All-on-3: A 3D Finite Element Study

Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin · Vol. 26 No. 01 (2026) · pp. 56–66

DOI
10.15294/jptm.v26i01.30115
ISSN
2503-1759, 2503-1759
Published
2026-08-10
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study evaluates the biomechanical performance of varying implant fixture diameters in mandibular edentulous rehabilitation using the All-on-3 concept with straight multi-unit abutments. A three-dimensional finite element model of a mandible segment was constructed and subjected to static occlusal loading conditions derived from clinical bite force data. Three Brånemark-type implants with diameters of 3.75 mm, 4.0 mm, and 5.0 mm were analyzed using ANSYS Workbench to assess von Mises stress, equivalent strain, and factor of safety (FOS) in abutment and screw components. The results revealed that increasing the fixture diameter to 5.0 mm reduced von Mises stress by 12.8- 15.0% in abutments and 17-44.3% in screws across anterior and posterior positions. Similarly, strain decreased by up to 11.1% in abutments and 45.0% in screws. The highest FOS (37.48 for abutment, 25.09 for screw) was recorded at the 5.0 mm diameter, confirming enhanced safety margins. However, posterior implants experienced stress transfer from abutment to screw components as diameter increased, particularly due to local stiffness mismatch and cantilever effects. While all configurations remained below Ti-6Al-4V yield strength, the posterior 3.75 mm setup yielded the lowest FOS (1.45), suggesting a higher mechanical risk. These findings emphasize the need for careful diameter selection in posterior All-on-3 designs.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 156 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
JamariAffiliation unknown8
Khoirul HudaAffiliation unknown7
DhiaulhaqueAffiliation unknown6
Ruben Bayu KristiawanAffiliation unknown5
Septian Eko CahyantoAffiliation unknown5
Beni Aji SubektiAffiliation unknown5
Mohd Syahmi JamaludinAffiliation unknown4
Fadhil Putra RamadhanAffiliation unknown4
Kaleb PriyantoAffiliation unknown4
Rachael AndikaAffiliation unknown4
Andrean Rachman RizaldyAffiliation unknown4
Muhammad KhumaediAffiliation unknown3
Wirawan SumbodoAffiliation unknown3
Rizki SetiadiAffiliation unknown3
Heri YudionoAffiliation unknown2
gunagung syahrul nizam sulkanAffiliation unknown2
Fatkhu AmanullohAffiliation unknown2
Dzikra Adi PratamaAffiliation unknown2
Dennis Andhara PutraAffiliation unknown2
Sudibtia Titio KoinAffiliation unknown1
Akhmad NurdinAffiliation unknown1
Khoirudin FathoniState University of Semarang1
AbdurrahmanAffiliation unknown1
MUHAMMAD NUR FAIZINAffiliation unknown1
Atta Putra HarjantoAffiliation unknown1
R. Imanu Danar HerunandiAffiliation unknown1
R. Ambar Kuntoro Mursit GendroyonoAffiliation unknown1
Nugroho Fajar SusantoAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Wifaqurrokhman AbdissalamAffiliation unknown1
Ari Dwi Nur Indriawan MusyonoAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Reza Wahyu PrasetyoAffiliation unknown1
Tegar Oki PrasdikaAffiliation unknown1
Imam Fitrah HadiAffiliation unknown1
Prastiyo prasAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPTM/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Effect of Implant Diameter on Biomechanical Response of Straight Multi-Unit Abutments in Mandibular All-on-3: A 3D Finite Element Study</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Muhammad Iqbal Ramadhani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kriswanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Febri Budi Darsono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rahmat Doni Widodo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">J. Jamari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Athanasius Priharyoto Bayuseno</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Finite element analysis, All-on-3, mandibular edentulous, full-arch prosthesis, implant diameter, biomechanical.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study evaluates the biomechanical performance of varying implant fixture diameters in mandibular edentulous rehabilitation using the All-on-3 concept with straight multi-unit abutments. A three-dimensional finite element model of a mandible segment was constructed and subjected to static occlusal loading conditions derived from clinical bite force data. Three Brånemark-type implants with diameters of 3.75 mm, 4.0 mm, and 5.0 mm were analyzed using ANSYS Workbench to assess von Mises stress, equivalent strain, and factor of safety (FOS) in abutment and screw components. The results revealed that increasing the fixture diameter to 5.0 mm reduced von Mises stress by 12.8- 15.0% in abutments and 17-44.3% in screws across anterior and posterior positions. Similarly, strain decreased by up to 11.1% in abutments and 45.0% in screws. The highest FOS (37.48 for abutment, 25.09 for screw) was recorded at the 5.0 mm diameter, confirming enhanced safety margins. However, posterior implants experienced stress transfer from abutment to screw components as diameter increased, particularly due to local stiffness mismatch and cantilever effects. While all configurations remained below Ti-6Al-4V yield strength, the posterior 3.75 mm setup yielded the lowest FOS (1.45), suggesting a higher mechanical risk. These findings emphasize the need for careful diameter selection in posterior All-on-3 designs.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-10</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPTM/article/view/30115</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jptm.v26i01.30115</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin; Vol. 26 No. 01 (2026): June 2026 "Special issues for finite element analysis"; 56 - 66</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1759</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1759</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jptm.v26i01</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/JPTM/article/view/30115/11032</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>