Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Realizing Apology Speech Acts in EFL: A Case Study of English Department Students at Universitas Negeri Semarang

Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature · Vol. 20 No. 3 (2025) · pp. 152–166

DOI
10.15294/lc.v19i2s.26830
ISSN
2460-853X, 1858-0157
Published
2025-08-22
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aimed to find out how English Department students at Universitas Negeri Semarang realize the speech act of apology in English and how certain social variables influence their realization. The study is grounded in Olshtain and Cohen’s (1983) taxonomy of apology strategies and Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory, which addresses the roles of power, social distance, and rank of imposition. Using a qualitative case study design, this study employed a written Discourse Completion Task (DCT) with ten situations involving differences in power, social distance, and offense severity. The subjects of this study were 20 students from the second semester. The collected data were analyzed using a categorization framework based on the five apology strategies by Olshtain and Cohen and contextual factors by Brown and Levinson. The findings showed that explicit expression of apology was the most frequently used strategy and promise for forbearance was the least frequently used strategy. Students were more likely to combine several strategies in their realization of apology speech act rather than using a single strategy. It also revealed that students adjust their apologies according to context, demonstrating awareness of social roles and communication appropriateness. The study concluded that the students can realize their apology speech act based on contextual factors such as power, social distance, and offense severity by their appropriateness in selecting and combining the strategies.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 123 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown8
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown5
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown5
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown4
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown2
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Zaid MuttaqinAffiliation unknown1
Alief Noor FaridaAffiliation unknown1
Pasca KalisaAffiliation unknown1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAffiliation unknown1
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown1
Putri AnggraeniAffiliation unknown1
Annisa Nur AtikahAffiliation unknown1
SetiowatiAffiliation unknown1
Abdrurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown1
Mokhammad Pradana AjiasaAffiliation unknown1
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown1
Banggala Puja SenaAffiliation unknown1
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown1
Gracendy Aluz Clarita BudionoAffiliation unknown1
Afief FakhruddinAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown1
Ismi KusumaningroemAffiliation unknown1
Dwi HastutiAffiliation unknown1
Rizky YolandaAffiliation unknown1
Agus RohmahwatiAffiliation unknown1
Oki SavyanandaruAffiliation unknown1
Firman WicaksonoAffiliation unknown1
Iif nur afifahAffiliation unknown1
Yayang Gita Permatasari GunawanAffiliation unknown1
Iis Siti AisyahAffiliation unknown1
Hanifah Nur Najibah KomanAffiliation unknown1
Alrina Raras TacazelyAffiliation unknown1
Irfan Zahid PrasetyaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/LC/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Realizing Apology Speech Acts in EFL: A Case Study of English Department Students at Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Irhami, Moh. Akhdan Aufarizal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yuliasri, Issy </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">speech act</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">realization</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">apology</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">pragmatic competence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">EFL learners</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aimed to find out how English Department students at Universitas Negeri Semarang realize the speech act of apology in English and how certain social variables influence their realization. The study is grounded in Olshtain and Cohen’s (1983) taxonomy of apology strategies and Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory, which addresses the roles of power, social distance, and rank of imposition. Using a qualitative case study design, this study employed a written Discourse Completion Task (DCT) with ten situations involving differences in power, social distance, and offense severity. The subjects of this study were 20 students from the second semester. The collected data were analyzed using a categorization framework based on the five apology strategies by Olshtain and Cohen and contextual factors by Brown and Levinson. The findings showed that explicit expression of apology was the most frequently used strategy and promise for forbearance was the least frequently used strategy. Students were more likely to combine several strategies in their realization of apology speech act rather than using a single strategy. It also revealed that students adjust their apologies according to context, demonstrating awareness of social roles and communication appropriateness. The study concluded that the students can realize their apology speech act based on contextual factors such as power, social distance, and offense severity by their appropriateness in selecting and combining the strategies.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-08-22</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/LC/article/view/26830</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lc.v19i2s.26830</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2025): August 2025 Special Issue; 152 - 166</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-853X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1858-0157</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lc.v19i2s</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/LC/article/view/26830/6016</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>