Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Rechterlijk Pardon Concept for Elderly Criminal Offenders: Konsep Rechterlijk Pardon Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Lansia

Annual Review of Legal Studies · Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)

DOI
10.15294/arls.vol1i3.10883
ISSN
3047-7875, 3047-7581
Published
2024-11-03
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The concept of rechterlijk pardon is a reform in the Criminal Code that can ease the burden on elderly people who are perpetrators of criminal acts. Efforts to avoid being sentenced to prison remind the author of restorative justice which prioritizes restoration or returning to the original situation for both the victim and the perpetrator. In this research, there are 2 (two) problem formulations, namely whether the rechterlijk pardon concept can be applied to elderly criminal offenders and how the rechterlijk pardon concept can be applied to elderly criminal offenders to realize restorative justice. This research uses a qualitative research approach and normative juridical research. The research focuses on juridical review in the concept of rechterlijk pardon in the Criminal Code. Research comes from primary legal materials such as the Criminal Code and relevant legal instruments, then secondary legal materials, such as books and literature in the form of legal journals, and various dictionaries as tertiary legal materials. Triangulation techniques are used to validate data with sources, theories and previous research. Based on this research, according to the concept of rechterlijk pardon in the Criminal Code, judge forgiveness can be applied to criminal offenders aged 75 years and over. However, based on research regarding the physical and psychological condition of the elderly, elderly people under 75 years also require special attention in sentencing. Apart from that, the concept of rechterlijk pardon would be better if it worked in accordance with restorative justice which provides a win-win solution for both the victim and the perpetrator.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 136 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown6
Wildan Azkal FikriAffiliation unknown5
Dede IndraswaraAffiliation unknown4
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown4
Anis WidyawatiAffiliation unknown3
Ratih DamayantiAffiliation unknown3
Irma CahyaningtyasAffiliation unknown3
Nadhira Madania DimartiAffiliation unknown2
Rasdi RasdiAffiliation unknown2
Adrian HadiputraAffiliation unknown2
Ikram AmrullahAffiliation unknown2
Hibatullah MaajidAffiliation unknown2
Rodiyah RodiyahAffiliation unknown2
Putri Balqis Nuril HakimAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Gelora MahardikaAffiliation unknown2
PujiyonoAffiliation unknown2
Diandra Preludio RamadaAffiliation unknown2
Firsta Rahadatul 'AisyAffiliation unknown2
Mulyo WidodoAffiliation unknown2
Siti MursidahAffiliation unknown2
‪Eram Tunggul Pawenang‬State University of Semarang1
Muhammad AzamAffiliation unknown1
Yustina Dhian NovitaAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Helmi Md SaidAffiliation unknown1
Sonny Saptoajie WicaksonoAffiliation unknown1
Indung WijayantoState University of Semarang1
Calvin CameronAffiliation unknown1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Aisyah Nur RafidahAffiliation unknown1
Kukuh Satria WiratamaAffiliation unknown1
Shofriya Qanitatin AbidahAffiliation unknown1
Quinny Azalia PutriAffiliation unknown1
Heri PurwantoAffiliation unknown1
Didik PurnomoAffiliation unknown1
Bhanu Prakash NunnaAffiliation unknown1
Bagus Hendradi KusumaAffiliation unknown1
Indah Sri UtariAffiliation unknown1
Benny SumardianaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Rechterlijk Pardon Concept for Elderly Criminal Offenders: Konsep Rechterlijk Pardon Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Lansia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Angga, Angga</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Maskur, Muhammad Azil</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The concept of rechterlijk pardon is a reform in the Criminal Code that can ease the burden on elderly people who are perpetrators of criminal acts. Efforts to avoid being sentenced to prison remind the author of restorative justice which prioritizes restoration or returning to the original situation for both the victim and the perpetrator. In this research, there are 2 (two) problem formulations, namely whether the rechterlijk pardon concept can be applied to elderly criminal offenders and how the rechterlijk pardon concept can be applied to elderly criminal offenders to realize restorative justice. This research uses a qualitative research approach and normative juridical research. The research focuses on juridical review in the concept of rechterlijk pardon in the Criminal Code. Research comes from primary legal materials such as the Criminal Code and relevant legal instruments, then secondary legal materials, such as books and literature in the form of legal journals, and various dictionaries as tertiary legal materials. Triangulation techniques are used to validate data with sources, theories and previous research. Based on this research, according to the concept of rechterlijk pardon in the Criminal Code, judge forgiveness can be applied to criminal offenders aged 75 years and over. However, based on research regarding the physical and psychological condition of the elderly, elderly people under 75 years also require special attention in sentencing. Apart from that, the concept of rechterlijk pardon would be better if it worked in accordance with restorative justice which provides a win-win solution for both the victim and the perpetrator.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-11-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/article/view/10883</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/arls.vol1i3.10883</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Annual Review of Legal Studies; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3047-7875</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3047-7581</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/arls.vol1i3.%a</dc:source>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Angga Angga (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>