Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATERI BATERAI ANTARA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF (JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER) DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN EKSPOSITORI

Automotive Science and Education Journal · Vol. 2 No. 2 (2013)

ISSN
2829-5080, 2252-6595
Published
2013-07-27
Publisher
Jurusan Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

abstrakPenelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui mana yang lebih baik antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dengan NHT serta model ekspositori pada materi baterai. Rancangan penelitian Control Group Pretest Posttest. Populasi penelitian ini siswa kelas X Teknik Kendaraan Ringan (TKR) SMK Muhammadiyah 02 Boja Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Sedangkan sampelnya siswa kelas X TKR 1 sejumlah 36 siswa diberikan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, kelas X TKR 3 berjumlah 36 siswa diberikan model pembelajaran tipe NHT dan kelas X TKR 2 sebanyak 35 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol dengan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Analisis data menggunakan uji-F dan uji-t. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan terdapat perbedaan signifikan pada ketiga kelompok dan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan NHT lebih baik daripada dengan model ekspositori, serta dapat disimpulkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi baterai pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT lebih baik daripada tipe Jigsaw.abstractThis study aims to determine which one is better between cooperative learning model type Jigsaw with NHT and expository on battery material. This type of research is experimental research design post-test group design. This study population is students of class X TKR SMK Muhammadiyah 02 Boja in Academic Year 2012/2013. The samples in this study were students of class X TKR 1 a total of 36 students are given learning model Jigsaw type, class X TKR 3 many as 36 students are NHT and class X TKR 2 as many as 35 students with a control class expository teaching model. Data analysis using F-test and t-test. This study concluded are significant differences in the three groups and the implementation of cooperative learning model type Jigsaw and NHT better than expository model, and the average student learning outcomes in battery material on NHT type is better than the type of Jigsaw.

Collaboration network of the authors

31 authors · 65 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Masugino -Affiliation unknown2
Pramesti DewiAffiliation unknown1
Dewi MustikaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Siti Harnina BintariAffiliation unknown1
Lusi Maswahyu AndriyaniAffiliation unknown1
PangestuAffiliation unknown1
Setiawan HendartoAffiliation unknown1
Widya AryadiAffiliation unknown1
Pramono -Affiliation unknown1
Sudita -Affiliation unknown1
Ade NurdyansyahAffiliation unknown1
Anton Ary WibowoAffiliation unknown1
Achmad SholehAffiliation unknown1
Dony Hidayat Al-JananAffiliation unknown1
Soesanto -Affiliation unknown1
Idris UmarAffiliation unknown1
Ari Agung NugrohoAffiliation unknown1
M.Khumaedi -Affiliation unknown1
Dwi Ardiyanto - EffendyAffiliation unknown1
Wirawan SumbodoAffiliation unknown1
Rizki SetiadiAffiliation unknown1
Arif RahmadhiAffiliation unknown1
Nurul Hadi MustofaAffiliation unknown1
Syahid Tri Kusuma Wijaya Al MuhyiAffiliation unknown1
Andri SetiyawanAffiliation unknown1
Febrian Arif BudimanAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad AnwarAffiliation unknown1
SudiyonoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/asej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATERI BATERAI ANTARA MODEL  PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF (JIGSAW  DAN  NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER)  DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN EKSPOSITORI</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Manshur, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>-, Sunyoto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>-, Sudarman</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">abstrakPenelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui mana yang lebih baik  antara model pembelajaran kooperatif  tipe Jigsaw dengan NHT serta model ekspositori pada materi baterai. Rancangan penelitian  Control Group Pretest Posttest. Populasi penelitian ini siswa kelas X Teknik Kendaraan Ringan (TKR) SMK Muhammadiyah 02 Boja Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Sedangkan sampelnya siswa kelas X TKR 1 sejumlah 36 siswa diberikan model pembelajaran kooperatif  tipe Jigsaw, kelas X TKR 3 berjumlah 36 siswa diberikan model pembelajaran tipe NHT dan kelas X TKR 2 sebanyak 35 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol dengan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Analisis data menggunakan uji-F dan uji-t. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan terdapat perbedaan signifikan pada ketiga kelompok dan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif  tipe Jigsaw dan NHT lebih baik daripada dengan model ekspositori, serta dapat disimpulkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi baterai pada model pembelajaran kooperatif  tipe NHT lebih baik daripada tipe Jigsaw.abstractThis study aims to determine which one is better between cooperative learning model type Jigsaw with NHT and expository on battery material. This type of  research is experimental research design post-test group design. This study population is students of  class X TKR SMK Muhammadiyah 02 Boja in Academic Year 2012/2013. The samples in this study were students of  class X TKR 1 a total of  36 students are given learning model Jigsaw type, class X TKR 3 many as 36 students are NHT and class X TKR 2 as many as 35 students with a control class expository teaching model. Data analysis using F-test and t-test. This study concluded are significant differences in the three groups and the implementation of  cooperative learning model type Jigsaw and NHT better than expository model, and the average student learning outcomes in battery material on NHT type is better than the type of  Jigsaw.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Jurusan Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2013-07-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/asej/article/view/1913</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Automotive Science and Education Journal; Vol 2 No 2 (2013): Automotive Science and Education Journal</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-5080</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6595</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/asej/article/view/1913/1717</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>