Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

THE COHERENCE BETWEEN THE TEACHING PLOT WRITTEN IN LESSON PLAN WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION IN THE CLASSROOM OF JAPANESE SUBJECT

Chi e Journal of Japanese Learning and Teaching · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2015)

DOI
10.15294/chie.v4i1.8438
ISSN
2252-6250
Published
2015-11-04
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

To achieve a learning goal, in the teaching learning activity there is a component that must interact one another. Those components are lesson material, teaching learning activity, media and evaluation. Therefore, the teacher must plan a teaching plot in the lesson plan. There are many things causing the learning goal was not achieved. One of them is the teaching plot that is not coherence with the implementation in the classroom. As what happen in the Japanese subject in SMA N 14 Semarang. According to the researcher’s observation which is conducted during PPL there are 3 of 38 students that were able to confirm or able to use the sentence pattern that was taught. In the introductory study, the teaching plot written in lesson plan was coherence with the teaching goal. Based on the problems above the researcher conducted a study in the coherence between the teaching plot written in the lesson plan and in the implementation in a classroom. This study was aimed to know the coherence between the teaching plot written in the lesson plan and in the implemetation in the classroom for Japanese subject in SMA N 14 Semarang. This study was a descriptive qualitative study. The technique of data collection was using documentation and observation. The observation was conducted by observing and equipped with the observation sheet in a form of checklist. The observation was done in three meetings in class XI IS 2. However, in the implementation it can be seen from the analysis result of this study about the coherence of the teaching plot consisted of three categories which is coherence, coherence with the note, and incoherence. The coheerence step is step which explained the learning goal, basic training, closing. The activity which is coherence with the note step is the greeting, drill, conclusion. The activity which is incoherence is the activity in the step of giving motivation, games, training application, and reflecting of the activity.

Collaboration network of the authors

33 authors · 78 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
dyah prasetianiAffiliation unknown4
Chevy Kusumah WardhanaAffiliation unknown3
Rina SupriatnaningsihAffiliation unknown3
Ai Sumirah SetiawatiAffiliation unknown2
Lispridona DinerAffiliation unknown2
Dany Buyung Yudha PrasetyaAffiliation unknown1
hasyyati elianAffiliation unknown1
mega silvia jelitaAffiliation unknown1
Renita Candra DewiAffiliation unknown1
Annisaa Al KhoirunaAffiliation unknown1
Rina AlaviahAffiliation unknown1
Faidatus TsalisAffiliation unknown1
Nova Ayu LisandyAffiliation unknown1
silvia nurhayatiAffiliation unknown1
Aditya Hendra CahyaAffiliation unknown1
Eva Meitha PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Ita YulianaAffiliation unknown1
Luthfia PratidinaAffiliation unknown1
M Afhiyan ArismanAffiliation unknown1
Hanif Nur FauziAffiliation unknown1
Lathiifah Triana DewiAffiliation unknown1
Tika IsnaviaAffiliation unknown1
Lisda NurjalekaAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Reza RustamAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Bangkit SanjayaAffiliation unknown1
Naufal Arya PambajengAffiliation unknown1
Dwi PuspitosariAffiliation unknown1
Yanuar LutfiAffiliation unknown1
Reigan Dwanu BratanandaAffiliation unknown1
Nidaa Nur AfifaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/chie/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE COHERENCE BETWEEN THE TEACHING PLOT WRITTEN IN LESSON PLAN WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION IN THE CLASSROOM OF JAPANESE SUBJECT</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Putri, Musdalifah Yuliati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rosliyah, Yuyun</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Oesman, Andy Moorad</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">To achieve a learning goal, in the teaching learning activity there is a component that must interact one another. Those components are lesson material, teaching learning activity, media and evaluation. Therefore, the teacher must plan a teaching plot in the lesson plan. There are many things causing the learning goal was not achieved. One of them is the teaching plot that is not coherence with the implementation in the classroom. As what happen in the Japanese subject in SMA N 14 Semarang. According to the researcher’s observation which is conducted during PPL there are 3 of 38 students that were able to confirm or able to use the sentence pattern that was taught. In the introductory study, the teaching plot written in lesson plan was coherence with the teaching goal. Based on the problems above the researcher conducted a study in the coherence between the teaching plot written in the lesson plan and in the implementation in a classroom. This study was aimed to know the coherence between the teaching plot written in the lesson plan and in the implemetation in the classroom for Japanese subject in SMA N 14 Semarang. This study was a descriptive qualitative study. The technique of data collection was using documentation and observation. The observation was conducted by observing and equipped with the observation sheet in a form of checklist. The observation was done in three meetings in class XI IS 2. However, in the implementation it can be seen from the analysis result of this study about the coherence of the teaching plot consisted of three categories which is coherence, coherence with the note, and incoherence. The coheerence step is step which explained the learning goal, basic training, closing. The activity which is coherence with the note step is the greeting, drill, conclusion. The activity which is incoherence is the activity in the step of giving motivation, games, training application, and reflecting of the activity.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2015-11-04</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/chie/article/view/8438</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/chie.v4i1.8438</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Chi'e: Journal of Japanese Learning and Teaching; Vol 4 No 1 (2015)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6250</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/chie.v4i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/chie/article/view/8438/5649</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>