Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Analysis of Economic Development GAP Between Regencies in Central Java Provinces

Economics Development Analysis Journal · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018) · pp. 194–199

DOI
10.15294/edaj.v5i2.22032
ISSN
2252-6560
Published
2018-03-08
Publisher
Economics Development Department, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Language
eng

Abstract

The purpose of this study were (1) to know how the development level of inequality of economic development in Central Java Province according to Williamson Index; (2) determine the extent of the influence of the labor force to the level of economic development of Central Java Province; and (3) know how to influence the allocation of development aid districts / cities to the economic development of Central Java province. This research is a quantitative research used panel data, time series data (years 2002-2011) and cross section (35 districts / cities in Central Java province). The data used in this research is secondary data obtained from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS). The analytical method used is the method of multiple linear regression analysis of panel data with FEM methods used tools Eviews 7 software. Results of the study is to show (1) the economic development gaps between regions in Central Java province which is calculated using Williamson index during the period 2008-2011 showed a widening inequality; (2) the allocation of development aid from the central government uneven and areas that receive aid are too large can increase the level of inequality between regions. This is due to the construction of concentrated to areas that are already developed than areas that are still lagging behind, because the area is developed better facilities from areas not yet developed; and (3) R2 value of 0.9949 means variable variation inequality of economic development in Central Java province can be explained by variables of the labor force and the allocation of regional development funds amounting to 95.5% while the remaining 0.05% is explained by other factors outside the model

Collaboration network of the authors

31 authors · 58 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Tarumanagara University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Rusdarti RusdartiAffiliation unknown3
Andryan SetyadharmaAffiliation unknown2
Awinda lutfina RatnasariAffiliation unknown1
Susanti Lasmaria PurbaAffiliation unknown1
Ayu Cahyaning KesumaAffiliation unknown1
Nurjannah Rahayu KistantiAffiliation unknown1
Rani Wahlian Aru MunjayanahAffiliation unknown1
Sarwito Asmoro JatiAffiliation unknown1
Khalwatul UlyaAffiliation unknown1
Chintia Ariani PutriAffiliation unknown1
Daffa Arkan PrameswaraAffiliation unknown1
Diyah Ayu WulansariAffiliation unknown1
Dyah Maya NihayahAffiliation unknown1
Dwi RahmayaniAffiliation unknown1
Avi Budi SetiawanAffiliation unknown1
Joko WidodoAffiliation unknown1
Maman RachmanAffiliation unknown1
Lilik LestariAffiliation unknown1
KardoyoAffiliation unknown1
Fugiyar SuhermanAffiliation unknown1
Etty SoesilowatiAffiliation unknown1
Noffik ErmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Deo Leko PudakaAffiliation unknown1
Agnes Pradina SimanjuntakAffiliation unknown1
Hendra PurwantoAffiliation unknown1
Partono ThomasAffiliation unknown1
Oki AnggraeniAffiliation unknown1
Wasino WasinoTarumanagara University1
Umi DarojahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edaj/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Analysis of Economic Development GAP Between Regencies in Central Java Provinces</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Irawan Yogyadipratama, Panji</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Prasetyo, P. Eko</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study were (1) to know how the development level of inequality of economic development in Central Java Province according to Williamson Index; (2) determine the extent of the influence of the labor force to the level of economic development of Central Java Province; and (3) know how to influence the allocation of development aid districts / cities to the economic development of Central Java province. This research is a quantitative research used panel data, time series data (years 2002-2011) and cross section (35 districts / cities in Central Java province). The data used in this research is secondary data obtained from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS). The analytical method used is the method of multiple linear regression analysis of panel data with FEM methods used tools Eviews 7 software. Results of the study is to show (1) the economic development gaps between regions in Central Java province which is calculated using Williamson index during the period 2008-2011 showed a widening inequality; (2) the allocation of development aid from the central government uneven and areas that receive aid are too large can increase the level of inequality between regions. This is due to the construction of concentrated to areas that are already developed than areas that are still lagging behind, because the area is developed better facilities from areas not yet developed; and (3) R2 value of 0.9949 means variable variation inequality of economic development in Central Java province can be explained by variables of the labor force and the allocation of regional development funds amounting to 95.5% while the remaining 0.05% is explained by other factors outside the model</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Economics Development Department, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-03-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/edaj/article/view/22032</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/edaj.v5i2.22032</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Economics Development Analysis Journal; Vol 5 No 2 (2016): Economics Development Analysis Journal; 194-199</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6560</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/edaj/article/view/22032/10463</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Economics Development Analysis Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>