Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

MENINGKATKAN KEAKTIFAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN MEMAHAMI PRINSIP-PRINSIP PENYELENGGARAAN ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN PROBING PROMPTING DI KELAS X AP 1 SMK HIDAYAH SEMARANG

Economic Education Analysis Journal · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2015)

ISSN
2502-356X, 2252-6544
Published
2015-03-11
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Hasil observasi awal menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata keaktifan siswa kelas X AP 1 tergolong rendah yaitu hanya sebesar 52 %. Siswa di kelas tersebut cenderung pasif hanya beberapa siswa yang bertanya dan mengemukakan pendapat pada saat pembelajaran berlangsung. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas, maka rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X Administrasi Perkantoran 1 SMK Hidayah Semarang yang terdiri dari 18 siswa. Hasil penelitian pada siklus I menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar 62,4% dalam kategori cukup aktif, rata-rata hasil belajar siswa sebesar 74,20 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 67%. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus II menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar 72% dalam kategori tinggi, rata-rata hasil belajar sebesar 79,62 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 72%. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus III menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar 78,88% dalam kategori tinggi, rata-rata hasil belajar sebesar 84,375 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 78%.Based on the initial observation, the data showed that the average students’ activeness of 10th grade students of Office Administration1 was less active, it was only 52%. Students were passive on the learning process because only several students who gave question and delivered arguments during the teaching learning proccess. Based on the background above, the questions of research were; 1) Did the implementations of Probing Prompting learning model improve students’ activeness? 2) The subject of this research was10th grade students of Office Administration I in SMK Hidayah Semarang, they were 18 students.. The data were collected by observation, documentation, and examination. The data were analyzed by classroom action research analysis and linear regression analysis.The result of cycle I showed that the average of students’ activeness was 62.4% which categorized on active enough, the average scor eof study result was 74.20 with classical completeness was 67%. The result of cycle II showed that the average of students’ activeness was 72% which categorized on highly active, the average score of learning result was 79,62 with classical completeness was 72%. The cycle III as the last cycle showed that the average of students’ activeness was 78.88% which categorized on highly active, the average of study result was 84.37 with classical completeness was 78%.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 72 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • IPB University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember4
Ahmad NurkhinAffiliation unknown4
Hengky PramusintoAffiliation unknown3
S MartonoAffiliation unknown3
Indrawati - IndrawatiAffiliation unknown2
Marimin MariminIPB University2
Bestari Dwi HandayaniAffiliation unknown2
Kusumantoro KusumantoroAffiliation unknown2
Hasan MukhibadAffiliation unknown2
Kardoyo KardoyoAffiliation unknown2
Agus WahyudinAffiliation unknown2
Heri YantoAffiliation unknown2
Agusrinal AgusrinalAffiliation unknown1
L.O.A Parman RudiaAffiliation unknown1
Nur InsaniAffiliation unknown1
Sitti Wirdhana Ahmad BakkarengAffiliation unknown1
Achmad Akbar BafaddalAffiliation unknown1
Jamili JamiliAffiliation unknown1
Nafilah NafilahAffiliation unknown1
Analuddin AnaluddinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Izal IzalAffiliation unknown1
Sitti Wirdhana Ahmad BakkaraengAffiliation unknown1
Putra PrabowoAffiliation unknown1
Sitti Wirdhana AhmadAffiliation unknown1
Rati CahyatiAffiliation unknown1
N. T. DewiAffiliation unknown1
A. KaryaAffiliation unknown1
Zulfatun Ni'mahAffiliation unknown1
SyarifuddinAffiliation unknown1
SutarAffiliation unknown1
Siti ZulekhaAffiliation unknown1
Srigati SrigatiAffiliation unknown1
Sri Muji SusiloAffiliation unknown1
Anggita Gilang PertiwiAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Endah PrasetyoAffiliation unknown1
Eri KhoiriyahAffiliation unknown1
Fanry Julius SopacuaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">MENINGKATKAN KEAKTIFAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN MEMAHAMI PRINSIP-PRINSIP PENYELENGGARAAN ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN PROBING PROMPTING DI KELAS X AP 1  SMK HIDAYAH SEMARANG</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rahmawati, Hasni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Muhsin, Muhsin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ismiyati, Ismiyati</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Hasil observasi awal menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata keaktifan siswa kelas X AP 1 tergolong rendah yaitu hanya sebesar 52 %. Siswa di kelas tersebut cenderung pasif hanya beberapa siswa yang bertanya dan mengemukakan pendapat pada saat pembelajaran berlangsung. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas, maka rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X Administrasi Perkantoran 1 SMK Hidayah Semarang yang terdiri dari 18 siswa. Hasil penelitian pada siklus I menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar  62,4% dalam kategori cukup aktif, rata-rata hasil belajar siswa sebesar 74,20 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 67%. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus II menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar 72% dalam kategori tinggi, rata-rata hasil belajar sebesar 79,62 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 72%. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus III menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar 78,88% dalam kategori tinggi, rata-rata hasil belajar sebesar 84,375 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 78%.Based on the initial observation, the data showed that the average students’ activeness of 10th grade students of Office Administration1 was less active, it was only 52%. Students were passive on the learning process because only several students who gave question and delivered arguments during the teaching learning proccess. Based on the background above, the questions of research were; 1) Did the implementations of Probing Prompting learning model improve students’ activeness? 2) The subject of this research was10th grade students of Office Administration I in SMK Hidayah Semarang, they were 18 students.. The data were collected by observation, documentation, and examination. The data were analyzed by classroom action research analysis and linear regression analysis.The result of cycle I showed that the average of students’ activeness was 62.4% which categorized on active enough, the average scor eof study result was 74.20 with classical completeness was 67%. The result of cycle II showed that the average of students’ activeness was 72% which categorized on highly active, the average score of learning result was 79,62 with classical completeness was 72%. The cycle III as the last cycle showed that the average of students’ activeness was 78.88% which categorized on highly active, the average of study result was 84.37 with classical completeness was 78%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2015-03-11</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eeaj/article/view/4680</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Economic Education Analysis Journal; Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-356X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6544</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eeaj/article/view/4680/4316</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>