Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN, FASILITAS KERJA, DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PERANGKAT DESA DI KECAMATAN MANDIRAJA KABUPATEN BANJARNEGARA

Economic Education Analysis Journal · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015)

ISSN
2502-356X, 2252-6544
Published
2015-08-21
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Kinerja perangkat desa adalah suatu hasil kerja yang dicapai oleh perangkat desa dalam melaksanakan tugas-tugas yang dibebankan kepadanya. Kinerja yang baik tentunya dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, seperti kepemimpinan, fasilitas kerja dan motivasi kerja yang ada di Kantor Desa di Kecamatan Mandiraja Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu Kepala Desa sebagai pemimpin kurang dapat memberikan contoh perilaku yang lebih baik, kurangnya fasilitas kerja yang memadai dan motivasi kerja yang kurang baik dalam hal lebih memilih mengerjakan tugas ketika sudah mendekati akhir waktu penyelesaian daripada menyelesaikan tugas lebih awal dari batas waktu yang ditentukan. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode angket dan dokumentasi. Uji keberartian persamaan regresi dilihat dari uji Fhitung = 100,579 dengan probabilitas sebesar 0,000 < 0,05 sehingga diperoleh analisis regresi linear berganda dengan persamaan Y=8,261+0,409X1+0,118X2+0,177X3. Besarnya pengaruh simultan antaran kepemimpinan, fasilitas kerja dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja yaitu 71,9%. Variabel yang memberikan pengaruh paling besar terhadap kinerja perangkat desa secara parsial adalah kepemimpinan yaitu sebesar 36%, sedangkan untuk fasilitas kerja dan motivasi kerja berpengaruh lebih kecil yaitu masing-masing sebesar 5,29% dan 16,56%.  The village officials’ performance is the performance which was achieved by the village officials’ after doing their jobs. Good performance is influenced by several factors, such as leadership, work facilities and work motivation in the village office at Mandiraja sub-district, Banjarnegara recency. The initial observation showed some performance problems such as; the head of the village as the leader did not give the good performance example, the lack of working equipment facilities and the low work motivation since the village officials’ prefer to do the job later when facing the deadline than finish it earlier before the deadline. The data were colleted by questionnaire and documentation. The significance test of regression was found out from F test = 100,579 with the probability 0,000 < 0,05, therefore the result of multiple linear regression analysis was Y=8,261+0,409X1+0,118X2+0,177X3. The simultaneous influence of Leadership, work facilities and work motivation toward the performance was 71,9%. The most influential variabel toward the performance was leadership which partially influenced up to 36%, whereas; the work facilities and work motivation gave smaller influence for 5,29% and 16,56%.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 51 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • IPB University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hengky PramusintoAffiliation unknown3
Marimin MariminIPB University2
Bestari Dwi HandayaniAffiliation unknown2
Zulfatun Ni'mahAffiliation unknown1
SyarifuddinAffiliation unknown1
SutarAffiliation unknown1
Srigati SrigatiAffiliation unknown1
Sri Muji SusiloAffiliation unknown1
Anggita Gilang PertiwiAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Endah PrasetyoAffiliation unknown1
Eri KhoiriyahAffiliation unknown1
Farih MansurAffiliation unknown1
Ade RustianaAffiliation unknown1
Hidayah LatifahAffiliation unknown1
Harnanik HarnanikAffiliation unknown1
Mulyani SeptiAffiliation unknown1
S.Martono S.MartonoAffiliation unknown1
Ariesa PrihatantiAffiliation unknown1
Gading PuspaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Muhsin MuhsinAffiliation unknown1
Hasni RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Muwartiningsih MuwartiningsihAffiliation unknown1
Lova LoveianaAffiliation unknown1
Moh Lutfi FadilAffiliation unknown1
Siti NurkhalimahAffiliation unknown1
Masasti SuciAffiliation unknown1
Ana Mariska WulansariAffiliation unknown1
Dias RahmasariAffiliation unknown1
Nita RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Zuhdan Kamal AbdillahAffiliation unknown1
Dewi Cahyani PurwaningsihAffiliation unknown1
Eka WidhiyartiAffiliation unknown1
Elmawati ElmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Nur’aini Diah SariAffiliation unknown1
Yulita RahmaniaAffiliation unknown1
Toni PrayogoAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Heny Siska PrianiAffiliation unknown1
Amelia Diah AgustinaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN, FASILITAS KERJA, DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PERANGKAT DESA DI KECAMATAN MANDIRAJA KABUPATEN BANJARNEGARA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Eka, Saptiana Nata</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ismiyati, Ismiyati</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Kinerja perangkat desa adalah suatu hasil kerja yang dicapai oleh perangkat desa dalam melaksanakan tugas-tugas yang dibebankan kepadanya. Kinerja yang baik tentunya dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, seperti kepemimpinan, fasilitas kerja dan motivasi kerja yang ada di Kantor Desa di Kecamatan Mandiraja Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu Kepala Desa sebagai pemimpin kurang dapat memberikan contoh perilaku yang lebih baik, kurangnya fasilitas kerja yang memadai dan motivasi kerja yang kurang baik dalam hal lebih memilih mengerjakan tugas ketika sudah mendekati akhir waktu penyelesaian daripada menyelesaikan tugas lebih awal dari batas waktu yang ditentukan. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode angket dan dokumentasi. Uji keberartian persamaan regresi dilihat dari uji Fhitung = 100,579 dengan probabilitas sebesar 0,000 &amp;lt; 0,05 sehingga diperoleh analisis regresi linear berganda dengan persamaan Y=8,261+0,409X1+0,118X2+0,177X3. Besarnya pengaruh simultan antaran kepemimpinan, fasilitas kerja dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja yaitu 71,9%. Variabel yang memberikan pengaruh paling besar terhadap kinerja perangkat desa secara parsial adalah kepemimpinan yaitu sebesar 36%, sedangkan untuk fasilitas kerja dan motivasi kerja berpengaruh lebih kecil yaitu masing-masing sebesar 5,29% dan 16,56%.   The village officials’ performance is the performance which was achieved by the village officials’ after doing their jobs. Good performance is influenced by several factors, such as leadership, work facilities and work motivation in the village office at Mandiraja sub-district, Banjarnegara recency. The initial observation showed some performance problems such as; the head of the village as the leader did not give the good performance example, the lack of working equipment facilities and the low work motivation since the village officials’ prefer to do the job later when facing the deadline than finish it earlier before the deadline. The data were colleted by questionnaire and documentation. The significance test of regression was found out from F test = 100,579 with the probability 0,000 &amp;lt; 0,05, therefore the result of multiple linear regression analysis was Y=8,261+0,409X1+0,118X2+0,177X3. The simultaneous influence of Leadership, work facilities and work motivation toward the performance was 71,9%. The most influential variabel toward the performance was leadership which partially influenced up to 36%, whereas; the work facilities and work motivation gave smaller influence for 5,29% and 16,56%.  </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2015-08-21</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eeaj/article/view/6785</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Economic Education Analysis Journal; Vol 4 No 2 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-356X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6544</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eeaj/article/view/6785/4863</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>