Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

PENGARUH FAKTOR-FAKTOR FRAUD DIAMOND DAN GONE THEORY TERHADAP KECURANGAN AKADEMIK

Economic Education Analysis Journal · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 120–139

ISSN
2502-356X, 2252-6544
Published
2018-04-19
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada pengaruh simultan dan parsial antara tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, kemampuan, keserakahan, kebutuhan dan pengungkapan terhadap kecurangan akademik pada siswa kompetensi keahlian akuntansi SMK Negeri 1 Kendal. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kompetensi keahlian akuntansi SMK Negeri 1 Kendal sejumlah 319 siswa. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah sampel jenuh. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan angket dan dokumentasi. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif dan analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan secara simultan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 59,4%, terdapat pengaruf positif dan signifikan tekanan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 2,4%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan kesempatan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 1,46%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan rasionalisasi terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 1,54%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan kemampuan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 4,28%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan keserakahan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 2,96%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan kebutuhan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 1,59% dan terdapat pengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 11,8%. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini adalah bahwa tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, kemampuan, keserakahan, kebutuhan dan pengungkapan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kecurangan akademik. Saran untuk peneliti selanjutnya diharapkan menggunakan alat analisis selain SPSS. This research aims to determine whether there is a simultaneous and partial influence between the pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, greed, need and exposure of academic fraud on students competency accounting expertise SMK Negeri 1 Kendal. Population in this research are students ofaccounting expertise skill SMK Negeri 1 Kendal a number of 319 students. Sampling technique in this research is saturated sample. Data collection methods using questionnaires and documentation. The method of analysis used is descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that there was a positive and significant influence simultaneously to academik farud of 59.4%, there is a positive and significant influence pressure on academic fraud by 2.4%, there is a positive and significant influence opportunity on academic fraud by 1.46%, there is a positif and significant influence rationalization on academik fraud by 1.54%, there is a positie and significant influence capability on academic fraud by 4.28%, there is a positive and significant influence greed on academic fraud by 2.96%, there is a positive and significant influence need on academic fraud by 1.59%, and there is a negative and siignificant exposure on academic fraud by -11,8%. The conclusion in this research is that pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, greed, need and exposure have positive and significant influence to academik fraud. Suggestions for futher researchers are expected to use analytical tools other than SPSS.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 75 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hasan MukhibadAffiliation unknown6
Muhsin MuhsinAffiliation unknown4
S MartonoAffiliation unknown4
Abdul RohmanAffiliation unknown3
Kusumantoro KusumantoroAffiliation unknown3
Khasan SetiajiAffiliation unknown2
KusumantoroAffiliation unknown2
Iwan Hardi SaputroAffiliation unknown2
Algifari AlgifariAffiliation unknown2
Fachrurrozie FachrurrozieAffiliation unknown2
FachrurrozieAffiliation unknown2
Satsya Yoga BaswaraAffiliation unknown2
Tri Jatmiko Wahyu PrabowoAffiliation unknown1
Fadli Arif SetiawanAffiliation unknown1
Puji LestariAffiliation unknown1
Ngabiyanto NgabiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Yozi Aulia RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad Syahrul FauziAffiliation unknown1
Dadi HartantoAffiliation unknown1
Raka Rizky AditamaAffiliation unknown1
Sri RokhaniAffiliation unknown1
Pertiwi Mega WeningAffiliation unknown1
Ayu ApriyantiAffiliation unknown1
Destiya Laelatul AzizahAffiliation unknown1
Sintaria RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Selawati SeptianingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Subkhan SubkhanAffiliation unknown1
Narendra Utama WAffiliation unknown1
Ilma AnisaturizqiAffiliation unknown1
Sifa FaridaAffiliation unknown1
Bangkit Candra BiramaAffiliation unknown1
Risnaeni RisnaeniAffiliation unknown1
Siti NurdiantiAffiliation unknown1
Shahtaz Twanneke Henga PutriAffiliation unknown1
Winda Nurul MaulidaAffiliation unknown1
Setiawati SetiawatiAffiliation unknown1
Afri SubarkahAffiliation unknown1
Duwi SeptianaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PENGARUH FAKTOR-FAKTOR FRAUD DIAMOND DAN GONE THEORY TERHADAP KECURANGAN AKADEMIK</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Munirah, Anisatul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nurkhin, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada pengaruh simultan dan parsial antara tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, kemampuan, keserakahan, kebutuhan dan pengungkapan terhadap kecurangan akademik pada siswa kompetensi keahlian akuntansi SMK Negeri 1 Kendal. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kompetensi keahlian akuntansi SMK Negeri 1 Kendal sejumlah 319 siswa. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah sampel jenuh. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan angket dan dokumentasi. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif dan analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan secara simultan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 59,4%, terdapat pengaruf positif dan signifikan tekanan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 2,4%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan kesempatan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 1,46%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan rasionalisasi terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 1,54%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan kemampuan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 4,28%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan keserakahan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 2,96%, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan kebutuhan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 1,59% dan terdapat pengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecurangan akademik sebesar 11,8%. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini adalah bahwa tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, kemampuan, keserakahan, kebutuhan dan pengungkapan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kecurangan akademik. Saran untuk peneliti selanjutnya diharapkan menggunakan alat analisis selain SPSS.
&amp;nbsp;
This research aims to determine whether there is a simultaneous and partial influence between the pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, greed, need and exposure of academic fraud on students competency accounting expertise SMK Negeri 1 Kendal. Population in this research are students ofaccounting expertise skill SMK Negeri 1 Kendal a number of 319 students. Sampling technique in this research is saturated sample. Data collection methods using questionnaires and documentation. The method of analysis used is descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that there was a positive and significant influence simultaneously to academik farud of 59.4%, there is a positive and significant influence pressure on academic fraud by 2.4%, there is a positive and significant influence opportunity on academic fraud by 1.46%, there is a positif and significant influence rationalization on academik fraud by 1.54%, there is a positie and significant influence capability on academic fraud by 4.28%, there is a positive and significant influence greed on academic fraud by 2.96%, there is a positive and significant influence need on academic fraud by 1.59%, and there is a negative and siignificant exposure on academic fraud by -11,8%. The conclusion in this research is that pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, greed, need and exposure have positive and significant influence to academik fraud. Suggestions for futher researchers are expected to use analytical tools other than SPSS.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-04-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eeaj/article/view/22862</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Economic Education Analysis Journal; Vol 7 No 1 (2018): Economic Education Analysis Journal; 120-139</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-356X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6544</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eeaj/article/view/22862/10783</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Economic Education Analysis Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>