Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Engaging Audiences with Courtesy: Gender Differences in Positive Politeness Strategies within TED Educational Speech videos

English Education Journal · Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024) · pp. 231–240

DOI
10.15294/4hevh483
Published
2024-06-20
Publisher
English Education Journal
Language
eng

Abstract

Improper communication, such as insults or bad language, is a communication problem. It may harm or threaten others in various situations. Positive politeness strategy can be used as the communication strategy to avoid face-threatening acts (FTA) and make the interlocutors feel comfortable. We examined positive politeness strategies used by male and female speakers in educational TED Talks speech videos and explained the differences between male and female speakers on the use of positive politeness. The strategies were analyzed using Brown and Levinson's (1988) politeness theory. This study used discourse analysis with pragmatic approach. Data was obtained from four educational TED Talks speech videos with two male and two female speakers. There were several stages to analyze the data using discourse study, including data identification, data categorization, data interpretation, conclusion drafting and verification. The findings suggest that male speakers often giving or asking for reasons in speeches to explain why they did it. Women often joked in their speeches to relaxed audiences and put them at ease. Also, joking strategy were applied differently by male and female speakers in delivering speeches. The female speaker had to explain the contexts and describe the images, whereas the male speaker was more spontaneous and fun. The findings of this study showed how male and female speakers use the appropriate utterances when delivering their speech in front of the audiences. Positive politeness strategies are used by the speakers to show their interest, build togetherness, and avoid conflict. Besides, the findings of this study can show the speakers’ ability in pragmatic competence by looking at their language use in specific context.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 132 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown8
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown7
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown5
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown5
Widya AmaliaAffiliation unknown4
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown3
Katharina RustipaAffiliation unknown3
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown3
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown3
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown2
Indah NurhidayahAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown2
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAffiliation unknown1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAffiliation unknown1
Siti NurohmahAffiliation unknown1
Saeful BahriAffiliation unknown1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
Anik HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Rahmiwati RahmiwatiAffiliation unknown1
Januarius MujiiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Annisa Nur AtikahAffiliation unknown1
Lilis SulistiantiAffiliation unknown1
Prahda Alifa FegasantiAffiliation unknown1
Fahmi MusthafaAffiliation unknown1
Urfatul MakhsunahAffiliation unknown1
Atika PurwaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Yesi Novita SariAffiliation unknown1
Syifa Fellashufa FadillahAffiliation unknown1
Regita Widya MurtiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Engaging Audiences with Courtesy: Gender Differences in Positive Politeness Strategies within TED Educational Speech videos</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sangaji, Fahmi Arif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hendi Pratama</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sri Wuli Fitriati</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Positive politeness strategies, Speech, Educational TED Talk videos.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Improper communication, such as insults or bad language, is a communication problem. It may harm or threaten others in various situations. Positive politeness strategy can be used as the communication strategy to avoid face-threatening acts (FTA) and make the interlocutors feel comfortable. We examined positive politeness strategies used by male and female speakers in educational TED Talks speech videos and explained the differences between male and female speakers on the use of positive politeness. The  strategies were analyzed using Brown and Levinson's (1988) politeness theory. This study used discourse analysis with pragmatic approach. Data was obtained from four educational TED Talks speech videos with two male and two female speakers. There were several stages to analyze the data using discourse study, including data identification, data categorization, data interpretation, conclusion drafting and verification. The findings suggest that male speakers often giving or asking for reasons in speeches to explain why they did it. Women often joked in their speeches to relaxed audiences and put them at ease. Also, joking strategy were applied differently by male and female speakers in delivering speeches. The female speaker had to explain the contexts and describe the images, whereas the male speaker was more spontaneous and fun. The findings of this study showed how male and female speakers use the appropriate utterances when delivering their speech in front of the audiences. Positive politeness strategies are used by the speakers to show their interest, build togetherness, and avoid conflict. Besides, the findings of this study can show the speakers’ ability in pragmatic competence by looking at their language use in specific context.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">English Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/article/view/11511</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/4hevh483</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">English Education Journal; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): June 2024; 231-240</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/article/view/11511/2210</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>