Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Effectiveness Of Student Team Achievement Division Cooperative Learning And Direct Instruction In Teaching Reading Comprehension To Students With Different Learning Motivation

English Education Journal · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017) · pp. 113–121

DOI
10.15294/eej.v7i2.15733
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2017-07-27
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the effects of Student Team Achievement Division Cooperative Learning (STAD CL) and Direct Instruction (DI) on improving students' reading comprehension with high or low learning motivation at eleventh grade students of Senior High School 1 Kudus and finding solutions and strategies to make teachers have the preference to use of STAD CL and DI in delivering the subject matter while teaching. This study was experimental research named two-way (two-by-two) factorial design. The population of this study was the eleventh year students of State Islamic Senior High School 1 Kudus in the Academic Year 2015/2016. There were five classes from XI-A to XI -E. Each class had 35 students, therefore, the total population was 175 students. Meanwhile the samples of this study were eighty students from four classes selected based on the historical factors and pre-existing ability. 80 students were chosen to be a sample, 40 as STAD CL group and 40 as DI group. Both groups were given the pre-test to measure students' reading skill and after several times of treatments, both groups were given the post-test. The results of this study showed that STAD CL as teaching strategy for teaching reading to those who had high and low learning motivation compared to DI was more effective than DI because most students stated that STAD CL contributed to increase the reading performance in the classroom. Further study may also be conducted to determine whether teachers’ use of STAD CL or DI appears to reduce student anxiety and stress in the classroom to improve students’ reading or even other skills, retention, and student-teacher relationships.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 114 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown10
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown5
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown4
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown4
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown4
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown3
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown2
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown2
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAffiliation unknown1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAffiliation unknown1
Siti NurohmahAffiliation unknown1
Saeful BahriAffiliation unknown1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
Katharina RustipaAffiliation unknown1
Anik HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Indah NurhidayahAffiliation unknown1
Lilis SulistiantiAffiliation unknown1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAffiliation unknown1
Atika PurwaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Mar’atul JannahAffiliation unknown1
M. Ubaidillah Karomi SafariAffiliation unknown1
Alim SukrisnoAffiliation unknown1
Ali MufizAffiliation unknown1
I Made SuwartamaAffiliation unknown1
Wanda GiovaniAffiliation unknown1
Inayatul MaulaAffiliation unknown1
yulia shinta kusumaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Nurma AiniAffiliation unknown1
Rifqi Hazmi MamduhanAffiliation unknown1
Yayang Gita Permatasari GunawanAffiliation unknown1
Andi Tenry Lawangen Aspat ColleAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Effectiveness Of Student Team Achievement Division Cooperative Learning And Direct Instruction In Teaching  Reading Comprehension To Students With Different Learning Motivation</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Oktaviana, Tyas</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed at investigating the effects of Student Team Achievement Division Cooperative Learning (STAD CL) and Direct Instruction (DI)&amp;nbsp; on improving students' reading comprehension with high or low learning motivation at eleventh grade students of Senior High School 1 Kudus and finding solutions and strategies to make teachers have the preference to use of STAD CL and DI in delivering the subject matter while teaching. This study was experimental research named two-way (two-by-two) factorial design. The population of this study was the eleventh year students of State Islamic Senior High School 1 Kudus in the Academic Year 2015/2016. There were five classes from XI-A to XI -E. Each class had 35 students, therefore, the total population was 175 students. Meanwhile the samples of this study were eighty students from four classes selected based on the historical factors and pre-existing ability. 80 students were chosen to be a sample, 40 as STAD CL group and 40 as DI group. Both groups were given the pre-test to measure students' reading skill and after several times of treatments, both groups were given the post-test. The results of this study showed that STAD CL as teaching strategy for teaching reading to those who had high and low learning motivation compared to DI was more effective than DI because most students stated that STAD CL contributed to increase the reading performance in the classroom. Further study may also be conducted to determine whether teachers’ use of STAD CL or DI appears to reduce student anxiety and stress in the classroom to improve students’ reading or even other skills, retention, and student-teacher relationships.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-07-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/15733</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v7i2.15733</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 7 No 2 (2017); 113-121</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/15733/8344</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>