Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Students’ Speaking Assessment Used by English Teachers Based on the 2013 Curriculum

English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 3 (2018) · pp. 359–369

DOI
10.15294/eej.v8i3.24823
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2018-08-16
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The present study was focused on the speaking assessment used by some English teachers in Margasari sub-district. The objectives of this study are to explain; 1) the Implementation of Speaking Assessment based on 2013 Curriculum, 2) the types of speaking assessment used by English teachers, 3) teachers’ perception on speaking assessment based on 2013 curriculum, and 4) teachers’ perception of speaking assessment based on 2013 compared to school based curriculum. This research was qualitative. The data were collected by implementing interview and questionnaires, observation, and document analysis. The samples of this study were eight English teachers who taught seventh grade in some schools in Margasari sub-district by using purposive sampling technique. The data of this study were classified and analyzed qualitatively. The result of the study showed that; 1) the English teachers of some Junior High Schools in Margasari sub-district have implemented the speaking assessment, yet it was not properly conducted and did not fulfil the standard 2) the usage of performance based assessment was used in assessing the students’ speaking skill with role play as its most frequently implemented assessing activity, 3) the teachers’ perception towards the speaking assessment was very good, considered the problems that could be addressed and the solutions to overcome them, and 4) most of teachers’ perceived that speaking assessment based on 2013 curriculum and school based curriculum is different from several points of view yet the same on the activity of speaking test.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 129 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Cenderawasih University
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown7
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown5
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown4
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown4
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown3
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown3
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown3
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown3
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown2
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Nyayu Yayu SuryaniAffiliation unknown1
Nesia OktaniaAffiliation unknown1
Novi Rahmania AquarizaAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAffiliation unknown1
Yuliana YulianaCenderawasih University1
Eka FatmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown1
wilis nurlelaAffiliation unknown1
Andini Lusiana SariAffiliation unknown1
Widya AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hamidah Ary RuchanaAffiliation unknown1
Endah PurwantiUniversitas Airlangga1
Kathrina RustipaAffiliation unknown1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Abdul Malik Al HakimAffiliation unknown1
Syarifa ManullangAffiliation unknown1
Rochyani LestiyanawatiAffiliation unknown1
Abdul MuhibAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Anggani L.B.Affiliation unknown1
Agus Rofi’iAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown1
Atikah WatiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Students’ Speaking Assessment Used by English Teachers Based on the 2013 Curriculum</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Jannah, Waritsatul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Rudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The present study was focused on the speaking assessment used by some English teachers in Margasari sub-district. The objectives of this study are to explain; 1) the Implementation of Speaking Assessment based on 2013 Curriculum, 2) the types of speaking assessment used by English teachers, 3) teachers’ perception on speaking assessment based on 2013 curriculum, and 4) teachers’ perception of speaking assessment based on 2013 compared to school based curriculum. This research was qualitative. The data were collected by implementing interview and questionnaires, observation, and document analysis. The samples of this study were eight English teachers who taught seventh grade in some schools in Margasari sub-district by using purposive sampling technique. The data of this study were classified and analyzed qualitatively. The result of the study showed that; 1) the English teachers of some Junior High Schools in Margasari sub-district have implemented the speaking assessment, yet it was not properly conducted and did not fulfil the standard 2) the usage of performance based assessment was used in assessing the students’ speaking skill with role play as its most frequently implemented assessing activity, 3) the teachers’ perception towards the speaking assessment was very good, considered the problems that could be addressed and the solutions to overcome them, and 4) most of teachers’ perceived that speaking assessment based on 2013 curriculum and school based curriculum is different from several points of view yet the same on the activity of speaking test.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-08-16</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/24823</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v8i3.24823</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 8 No 3 (2018): September 2018; 359-369</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v8i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/24823/11280</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>