Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The effectiveness of socrative and kahoot to teach grammar to students with different interest

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2020) · pp. 366–373

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.36696
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2020-09-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aimed at examining the effectiveness of socrative and kahootto teach grammar to students with different interest. The objectives of the study are, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of socrative, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of kahoot, to analyze the significant difference between the students with high interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze the significant difference between the students with low interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze how the interaction is among teaching, students’ interest and grammar. It was an experimental research with 2x2 factorial design. I used questionnaire, observation and test. The data from questionnaire and grammar test is analyzed quantitatively using T-test and ANOVA.The results of this research showed that socrative to students with high and low interest (79.17 and 57.50) and kahoot to students with high and low interest (85.50 and 62.86) are effective. Mean score of kahoot multimedia was higher than socrative in teaching grammar. There was no significant interaction among multimedia, interest and students’ grammar achievement..

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 132 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown6
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown5
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown4
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown3
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa ShakiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAffiliation unknown1
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown1
Banggala Puja SenaAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Prima PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1
Maria Fifi HermawatiAffiliation unknown1
Daniela Elivas HastunarAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown1
Daning Desy ArtyaniAffiliation unknown1
Atikah WatiAffiliation unknown1
Warsono -Affiliation unknown1
Atiya Mahmud HanaAffiliation unknown1
Evi FebrianaAffiliation unknown1
Ulya RosyitaAffiliation unknown1
Riski SafitriAffiliation unknown1
Nova Rifqi FaristaAffiliation unknown1
Siti MujahadahAffiliation unknown1
Windhariyati Dyah KusumawantiAffiliation unknown1
Ivvon Septina BellaAffiliation unknown1
abdulhakim faraj alowalidAffiliation unknown1
sigit sulistiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Nur Via PahlawanitaAffiliation unknown1
Ari Putri HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Nurma AiniAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The effectiveness of socrative and kahoot to teach grammar to students with different interest</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Maesaroh, Maesaroh</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Anggani Linggar Bharati, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed at examining the effectiveness of socrative and kahootto teach grammar to students with different interest. The objectives of the study are, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of socrative, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of kahoot, to analyze the significant difference between the students with high interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze the significant difference between the students with low interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze how the interaction is among teaching, students’ interest and grammar. It was an experimental research with 2x2 factorial design. I used questionnaire, observation and test. The data from questionnaire and grammar test is analyzed quantitatively using T-test and ANOVA.The results of this research showed that socrative to students with high and low interest (79.17 and 57.50) and kahoot to students with high and low interest (85.50 and 62.86) are effective. Mean score of kahoot multimedia was higher than socrative in teaching grammar. There was no significant interaction among multimedia, interest and students’ grammar achievement..</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/36696</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.36696</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 3 (2020): September 2020; 366-373</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/36696/15228</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>