Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Evaluating the Appropriateness of English Textbook Used for Teaching English for Specific Purposes

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 140–151

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i1.70649
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2023-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

One of the steps in creating a course that delivers validity and relevance for all course design activities is analyzing the needs of the students. Need analysis helps teachers to identify students’ needs in learning English based on their daily needs and future needs. This study intends to evaluate the English textbook appropriateness for students and the school’s needs in ESP in the office administration program at SMK Setiabudhi Semarang. Hutchison and Waters (1987) proposed the theory that was employed in this research. The theory elaborates on the concept of need analysis in ESP that should contribute to the target and learning needs. Target needs are linked to what the students need to accomplish in the target situation, while learning needs refer to what the students need to do to learn effectively. This study applied a descriptive qualitative research approach to analyze the information gained via student surveys, teacher interviews, and document observations. The study's findings demonstrate that the English textbook used was deemed appropriate for meeting both the students and the school’s needs. The degree of appropriateness revealed that, on average, the textbook satisfied 77% of school needs and 87% of student needs. The result is expected to give a contribution to both teachers and students to evaluate their English materials in the textbook used in learning ESP.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 110 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown7
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown5
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown5
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Dinda Rahmadhani PutriAffiliation unknown1
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAffiliation unknown1
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown1
Banggala Puja SenaAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Prima PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1
Maria Fifi HermawatiAffiliation unknown1
Warsono -Affiliation unknown1
Atiya Mahmud HanaAffiliation unknown1
Evi FebrianaAffiliation unknown1
Ulya RosyitaAffiliation unknown1
Riski SafitriAffiliation unknown1
Siti MujahadahAffiliation unknown1
Ivvon Septina BellaAffiliation unknown1
sigit sulistiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Nur Via PahlawanitaAffiliation unknown1
Ari Putri HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Nurma AiniAffiliation unknown1
Firdausi Wimad SaritwaAffiliation unknown1
Sri Wuli FitrianiAffiliation unknown1
Oscar Yustino CarascalaoAffiliation unknown1
Yusanti Nenci FaotAffiliation unknown1
Maria Fridolin NabenAffiliation unknown1
Lisa Binti HarunAffiliation unknown1
Okta Maya FitriAffiliation unknown1
Nesti Noor HayatiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Evaluating the Appropriateness of English Textbook Used for Teaching English for Specific Purposes</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurhidayah, Siti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Shakiyya, Zulfa</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">One of the steps in creating a course that delivers validity and relevance for all course design activities is analyzing the needs of the students. Need analysis helps teachers to identify students’ needs in learning English based on their daily needs and future needs. This study intends to evaluate the English textbook appropriateness for students and the school’s needs in ESP in the office administration program at SMK Setiabudhi Semarang. Hutchison and Waters (1987) proposed the theory that was employed in this research. The theory elaborates on the concept of need analysis in ESP that should contribute to the target and learning needs. Target needs are linked to what the students need to accomplish in the target situation, while learning needs refer to what the students need to do to learn effectively. This study applied a descriptive qualitative research approach to analyze the information gained via student surveys, teacher interviews, and document observations. The study's findings demonstrate that the English textbook used was deemed appropriate for meeting both the students and the school’s needs. The degree of appropriateness revealed that, on average, the textbook satisfied 77% of school needs and 87% of student needs. The result is expected to give a contribution to both teachers and students to evaluate their English materials in the textbook used in learning ESP.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/70649</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i1.70649</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 1 (2023): March 2023; 140-151</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/70649/25141</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>