Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Violation of Leech’s Politeness Maxims and Interlocutor’s Responses in Enola Holmes 2020 Movie

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023) · pp. 191–208

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i2.71435
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2023-06-20
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The present study aimed at investigating the violation of politeness maxims of Leech (2014) and the interlocutor’s responses in the movie of Enola Holmes 2020. This study focuses on discussing violations of decency according to Leech and illocutionary acts where there is an action in acting an utterance and a response to what is done. The source of the data was taken from the utterances or dialogue spoken by the characters in this film, the method used is the documentation method by observing the film and then making a transcript of the conversation according to the required data then watching the video and reading the script repeatedly. A qualitative descriptive research design was used in this study. In line with that, Leech's theory of politeness maxims (2014) and illocutionary acts (1993) were used to analyze the research data. Based on the analysis, it was found 7 types of maxims, namely generosity maxim, tact maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim, obligation O to S maxim, agreement maxim, and sympathy maxim. Then, the interlocutor’s responses also found 4 types in this movie were Competitive, Convivial, Collaborative and Conflictive, the most appears of violation politeness maxim was Collaborative functions (33,3%), while the most least was Convivial functions (5,5%). There were lots of interlocutor’s reactions by the characters of the movie such as angry, smiling, offended, etc.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 92 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Widya AmaliaAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown3
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Katharina RustipaAffiliation unknown2
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Indah NurhidayahAffiliation unknown1
Rahmiwati RahmiwatiAffiliation unknown1
Januarius MujiiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Annisa Nur AtikahAffiliation unknown1
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown1
Prahda Alifa FegasantiAffiliation unknown1
Fahmi MusthafaAffiliation unknown1
Urfatul MakhsunahAffiliation unknown1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAffiliation unknown1
Yesi Novita SariAffiliation unknown1
Syifa Fellashufa FadillahAffiliation unknown1
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Regita Widya MurtiAffiliation unknown1
Faiz MaulidaAffiliation unknown1
Egi RaputriAffiliation unknown1
Yan MujiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Etri WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Luluatul Musyafa'ahAffiliation unknown1
Etik Khusnul KhotimahAffiliation unknown1
Djanuarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Tomy WidiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Ayu Dewi FatimahAffiliation unknown1
Heru PriyatnaAffiliation unknown1
umniyyatul makmurohAffiliation unknown1
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Zaiim MuhtadiAffiliation unknown1
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown1
Ummi Ashim AzzahraAffiliation unknown1
Ema Sri RahayuAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Violation of Leech’s Politeness Maxims and Interlocutor’s Responses in Enola Holmes 2020 Movie</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Fitriana, Shofi Anis</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pratama, Hendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The present study aimed at investigating the violation of politeness maxims of Leech (2014) and the interlocutor’s responses in the movie of Enola Holmes 2020. This study focuses on discussing violations of decency according to Leech and illocutionary acts where there is an action in acting an utterance and a response to what is done. The source of the data was taken from the utterances or dialogue spoken by the characters in this film, the method used is the documentation method by observing the film and then making a transcript of the conversation according to the required data then watching the video and reading the script repeatedly. A qualitative descriptive research design was used in this study. In line with that, Leech's theory of politeness maxims (2014) and illocutionary acts (1993) were used to analyze the research data. Based on the analysis, it was found 7 types of maxims, namely generosity maxim, tact maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim, obligation O to S maxim, agreement maxim, and sympathy maxim. Then, the interlocutor’s responses also found 4 types in this movie were Competitive, Convivial, Collaborative and Conflictive, the most appears of violation politeness maxim was Collaborative functions (33,3%), while the most least was Convivial functions (5,5%). There were lots of interlocutor’s reactions by the characters of the movie such as angry, smiling, offended, etc.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/71435</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i2.71435</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 2 (2023): June 2023; 191-208</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/71435/25398</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>