Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Comparative Study of Learning Outcomes Between the Application of the Seminar Method and the Preparatory Assignment Method in History Learning

Indonesian Journal of History Education · Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016) · pp. 27–36

DOI
10.15294/ijhe.v1i1.246
ISSN
2549-0354, 2252-6641
Published
2016-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This is a comparative study of two methods of learning: the experimental method and the method of assignment preparation seminar. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning outcomes of students who were taught by both methods, as well as to know the difference between the methods of implementation of tasks and methods of preparation seminar. The approach of this research is to experimentally study the entire population of students in class XI IPS SMA 3 Demak, while the sample taken is class 1 and class XI IPS 3. Study results indicate that a class of students who were taught using seminars obtained better results than the class taught by the method of preparation tasks, although both performed equally well. This study suggests that Learners need to be encouraged to be active participants in learning; seminar methods and preparation task methods can be applied in teaching history to make students active in education.

Collaboration network of the authors

27 authors · 43 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Migas
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Alya SalsabillaAffiliation unknown2
Muh. Nur Hasan SyahAffiliation unknown2
Fitriyani FitriyaniAffiliation unknown1
Warno WarnoAffiliation unknown1
Farida Nur AiniAffiliation unknown1
Muh. SholehAffiliation unknown1
Nanang IndardiAffiliation unknown1
Vacktian Diva GumalaAffiliation unknown1
Fitri Amalia ShintasiwiAffiliation unknown1
Ferani MulianingsihAffiliation unknown1
Shafarina SariAffiliation unknown1
Aprillia FindayaniAffiliation unknown1
Nanda Julian UtamaAffiliation unknown1
Dimas Nur RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Fajar HidayatullahAffiliation unknown1
Elsa Durotul FaridahAffiliation unknown1
Febriarti Setiya Putri FebriAffiliation unknown1
Istianah MahfudAffiliation unknown1
Nazilatul MunafiahAffiliation unknown1
Ruli AndriyantoAffiliation unknown1
Jamaluddin JamaluddinSekolah Tinggi Teknologi Migas1
Ahmad SanusiAffiliation unknown1
Yusuf SomawinataAffiliation unknown1
Arif RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Fathiarica Sharifa PutriAffiliation unknown1
Dadi Hidayat MaskarAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ijhe/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Comparative Study of Learning Outcomes Between the Application of the Seminar Method and the Preparatory Assignment Method in History Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Anwar, Khoirul</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This is a comparative study of two methods of learning: the experimental method and the method of assignment preparation seminar. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning outcomes of students who were taught by both methods, as well as to know the difference between the methods of implementation of tasks and methods of preparation seminar. The approach of this research is to experimentally study the entire population of students in class XI IPS SMA 3 Demak, while the sample taken is class 1 and class XI IPS 3. Study results indicate that a class of students who were taught using seminars obtained better results than the class taught by the method of preparation tasks, although both performed equally well. This study suggests that Learners need to be encouraged to be active participants in learning; seminar methods and preparation task methods can be applied in teaching history to make students active in education.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2016-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ijhe/article/view/246</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijhe.v1i1.246</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Indonesian Journal of History Education; Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Indonesian Journal of History Education; 27-36</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-0354</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6641</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijhe.v1i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ijhe/article/view/246/276</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>