Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Digital Constitutionalism: A Pancasila Framework in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Indonesian Journal of Pancasila & Global Constitutionalism · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 76–115

DOI
10.15294/ijpgc.v5i1.48383
ISSN
2830-0610, 2830-0629
Published
2026-06-28
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has fundamentally shifted the locus of power from sovereign states to opaque private algorithms, precipitating a critical need for robust digital constitutionalism. However, contemporary global AI governance is overwhelmingly dominated by Western paradigms—namely, the European rights-and-risk-based model and the US market-driven approach. While historically significant, these Eurocentric frameworks operate on hyper-individualistic epistemologies that prove structurally inadequate when transplanted to the Global South. They frequently fail to mitigate collective vulnerabilities, structural algorithmic bias, and the monopolistic extraction of data inherent in platform capitalism. Employing doctrinal legal research with conceptual and comparative constitutional methodologies, this article decolonizes the AI governance discourse by proposing Pancasila—Indonesia’s state philosophy—as a Communitarian-Religious Constitutional Framework. The study demonstrates that Pancasila transcends the limitations of secular-liberal models by synthesizing transcendental ethics, relational human dignity, democratic cohesion, and distributive justice. Specifically, the paper operationalizes the Indonesian Constitution to articulate a dual-pronged legal response: enforcing the Second Principle to combat structural algorithmic discrimination through substantive equality, and the Fifth Principle to dismantle Big Tech oligarchies via a constitutional economy. Ultimately, this research conceptualizes "Algorithmic Welfare Constitutionalism." It offers not merely a localized ideological critique, but a transformative normative grammar for post-colonial and developing nations, ensuring that algorithmic power remains unequivocally subservient to human dignity, collective solidarity, and equitable digital sovereignty.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

23 authors · 67 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Muhammad Azil MaskurAffiliation unknown4
Wildan Azkal FikriAffiliation unknown3
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang2
Dheni Anugerah PrasetyaAffiliation unknown2
Yustina Dhian NovitaAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Helmi Md SaidAffiliation unknown1
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown1
R Benny RiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Nurul FibriantiAffiliation unknown1
Karsinah KarsinahAffiliation unknown1
Bintang Rafli AnantaAffiliation unknown1
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAffiliation unknown1
Galih Niken Anggoto SulaksmiAffiliation unknown1
Aisyah Nur RafidahAffiliation unknown1
Venessa HuwaeAffiliation unknown1
Sudrajat TediAffiliation unknown1
Tri Lisiani PrihatinahAffiliation unknown1
Duhita PandyaAffiliation unknown1
Ali Masyhar MursyidAffiliation unknown1
Safira Embun InsanidyaAffiliation unknown1
Kayla Achri SalsabilaAffiliation unknown1
Nafa Isma Nur FattihAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijpgc/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Digital Constitutionalism: A Pancasila Framework in the Era of Artificial Intelligence</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Indraswara, Dede</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Constitutionalism</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pancasila</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Algorithmic Bias</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Big Tech Monopoly</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has fundamentally shifted the locus of power from sovereign states to opaque private algorithms, precipitating a critical need for robust digital constitutionalism. However, contemporary global AI governance is overwhelmingly dominated by Western paradigms—namely, the European rights-and-risk-based model and the US market-driven approach. While historically significant, these Eurocentric frameworks operate on hyper-individualistic epistemologies that prove structurally inadequate when transplanted to the Global South. They frequently fail to mitigate collective vulnerabilities, structural algorithmic bias, and the monopolistic extraction of data inherent in platform capitalism. Employing doctrinal legal research with conceptual and comparative constitutional methodologies, this article decolonizes the AI governance discourse by proposing Pancasila—Indonesia’s state philosophy—as a Communitarian-Religious Constitutional Framework. The study demonstrates that Pancasila transcends the limitations of secular-liberal models by synthesizing transcendental ethics, relational human dignity, democratic cohesion, and distributive justice. Specifically, the paper operationalizes the Indonesian Constitution to articulate a dual-pronged legal response: enforcing the Second Principle to combat structural algorithmic discrimination through substantive equality, and the Fifth Principle to dismantle Big Tech oligarchies via a constitutional economy. Ultimately, this research conceptualizes "Algorithmic Welfare Constitutionalism." It offers not merely a localized ideological critique, but a transformative normative grammar for post-colonial and developing nations, ensuring that algorithmic power remains unequivocally subservient to human dignity, collective solidarity, and equitable digital sovereignty.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijpgc/article/view/48383</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijpgc.v5i1.48383</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Journal of Pancasila &amp; Global Constitutionalism; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026; 76-115</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2830-0610</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2830-0629</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijpgc.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijpgc/article/view/48383/10330</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Dede Indraswara (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>